Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton Only - January 2022 Transfer Rumours (Deadline Day p.97)

1112113115117118

Comments

  • Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Dobson and Clare in particular need extending, their contracts (2 year deals to 2023) seem like outliers when Chuks and Fraser are contracted to 2025

    Gilbey and MacG (and indeed Morgan) are less urgent, they need to earn a contract extension.

    Of the ones expiring this summer, I'm not bothered either way about Matthews, Purrington and Washington. Both will do a job in L1, but both are replaceable. With Pearce, I imagine it depends on how much they see him playing next season, and whether we can afford the squad place for a player/coach
    With Washington IMO it's a case of can you realistically get two strikers better than him? 
    Assuming we'll be in L1 next season, I can see us wanting him for another year as he seems a decent guy to have around the place, but he'll want a longer deal
    I think that’s what it’ll come down to. I’ll be concerned if Washington signs a 3 or 4 year deal. If he stays it’s got to be 1 or 2 at most.
    I don't think 2 years would be a problem for most of them tbh.  If you first team is good enough to get promoted your would think most of them could step up. 

    You will already have to replace any loans and a couple that fall out the bottom, for want of a better expression.

    Even this season the players we retained aren't in all honesty the problem. 
    You wouldn’t want to keep Matthews, Gunter, Watson etc though would you?
    Matthews yes, tother two .. NO

  • Leuth said:
    Anyway, for all that I'm on acid or an idiot or whatever, none of you have provided actual reasons for why Lee's skillset or physical abilities disbar him from being capable of playing a DM role. He's not exactly averse to putting in a challenge, is he? I'm not remotely saying he's as good as Dobson, but would you rather him or Watson in there?
    Because it's nonsense. It's a fantasy. It a drunken pub discussion where the one with the screw loose makes the random suggestion and you all change the subject and get another round in.
    I've no idea whether Elliot Lee would make a good defensive midfielder, but you can bet his coaches and the man himself do.
    Why waste time and resource sticking a player in a role you didn't recruit him for (unless the player had at some point shown an aptitude and desire for the role).
    Christ, it's difficult enough getting the right players in, getting them motivated and working to instruction, without randomly sticking one in an unfamiliar role because their dad did it.
  • edited February 2022
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Dobson and Clare in particular need extending, their contracts (2 year deals to 2023) seem like outliers when Chuks and Fraser are contracted to 2025

    Gilbey and MacG (and indeed Morgan) are less urgent, they need to earn a contract extension.

    Of the ones expiring this summer, I'm not bothered either way about Matthews, Purrington and Washington. Both will do a job in L1, but both are replaceable. With Pearce, I imagine it depends on how much they see him playing next season, and whether we can afford the squad place for a player/coach
    With Washington IMO it's a case of can you realistically get two strikers better than him? 
    Assuming we'll be in L1 next season, I can see us wanting him for another year as he seems a decent guy to have around the place, but he'll want a longer deal
    I think that’s what it’ll come down to. I’ll be concerned if Washington signs a 3 or 4 year deal. If he stays it’s got to be 1 or 2 at most.
    I don't think 2 years would be a problem for most of them tbh.  If you first team is good enough to get promoted your would think most of them could step up. 

    You will already have to replace any loans and a couple that fall out the bottom, for want of a better expression.

    Even this season the players we retained aren't in all honesty the problem. 
    You wouldn’t want to keep Matthews, Gunter, Watson etc though would you?
    Matthews I don't know but would be fine as a squad player. 

    The other 2 of course not but they are not the reason we are 15th.  Gunter played because we didn't get a left back and has hardly played since and Watson only started 6 games partly because Arter wasn't fit for purpose and partly because we only had 3 fit midfielders.  

    Each mistake we made in the summer was magnified by another one. 
  • Leuth said:
    Anyway, for all that I'm on acid or an idiot or whatever, none of you have provided actual reasons for why Lee's skillset or physical abilities disbar him from being capable of playing a DM role. He's not exactly averse to putting in a challenge, is he? I'm not remotely saying he's as good as Dobson, but would you rather him or Watson in there?
    Because it's nonsense. It's a fantasy. It a drunken pub discussion where the one with the screw loose makes the random suggestion and you all change the subject and get another round in.
    I've no idea whether Elliot Lee would make a good defensive midfielder, but you can bet his coaches and the man himself do.
    Why waste time and resource sticking a player in a role you didn't recruit him for (unless the player had at some point shown an aptitude and desire for the role).
    Christ, it's difficult enough getting the right players in, getting them motivated and working to instruction, without randomly sticking one in an unfamiliar role because their dad did it.
    And so we have impasse. Until Dobson is unavailable, and then we see what Jackson does.
  • Cafc43v3r said:
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Dobson and Clare in particular need extending, their contracts (2 year deals to 2023) seem like outliers when Chuks and Fraser are contracted to 2025

    Gilbey and MacG (and indeed Morgan) are less urgent, they need to earn a contract extension.

    Of the ones expiring this summer, I'm not bothered either way about Matthews, Purrington and Washington. Both will do a job in L1, but both are replaceable. With Pearce, I imagine it depends on how much they see him playing next season, and whether we can afford the squad place for a player/coach
    With Washington IMO it's a case of can you realistically get two strikers better than him? 
    Assuming we'll be in L1 next season, I can see us wanting him for another year as he seems a decent guy to have around the place, but he'll want a longer deal
    I think that’s what it’ll come down to. I’ll be concerned if Washington signs a 3 or 4 year deal. If he stays it’s got to be 1 or 2 at most.
    I don't think 2 years would be a problem for most of them tbh.  If you first team is good enough to get promoted your would think most of them could step up. 

    You will already have to replace any loans and a couple that fall out the bottom, for want of a better expression.

    Even this season the players we retained aren't in all honesty the problem. 
    You wouldn’t want to keep Matthews, Gunter, Watson etc though would you?
    Matthews I don't know but would be fine as a squad player. 

    The other 2 of course not but they are not the reason we are 15th.  Gunter played because we didn't get a left back and has hardly played since and Watson only started 6 games partly because Arter wasn't fit for purpose and partly because we only had 3 fit midfielders.  

    Each mistake we made in the summer was magnified by another one. 
    For me that is a problem - we’re stuck with players the manager doesn’t rate. They’re taking up wages and they aren’t pushing others for a place in the team.

    It’s far from the only problem and all these small issues add up and magnify as you say.
  • Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    Anyway, for all that I'm on acid or an idiot or whatever, none of you have provided actual reasons for why Lee's skillset or physical abilities disbar him from being capable of playing a DM role. He's not exactly averse to putting in a challenge, is he? I'm not remotely saying he's as good as Dobson, but would you rather him or Watson in there?
    Because it's nonsense. It's a fantasy. It a drunken pub discussion where the one with the screw loose makes the random suggestion and you all change the subject and get another round in.
    I've no idea whether Elliot Lee would make a good defensive midfielder, but you can bet his coaches and the man himself do.
    Why waste time and resource sticking a player in a role you didn't recruit him for (unless the player had at some point shown an aptitude and desire for the role).
    Christ, it's difficult enough getting the right players in, getting them motivated and working to instruction, without randomly sticking one in an unfamiliar role because their dad did it.
    And so we have impasse. Until Dobson is unavailable, and then we see what Jackson does.
    Oh, I think it is a safe bet he will select Watson.
    That's a mistake that will hopefully be corrected in the summer.
    It's crying shame that Watson triggered his own extension because I'd wager that otherwise we would have held on to Pratley instead, at least for one more year to understudy Dobson, and he is a natural in that DM role.
    Also a leader and good influence in the dressing room.
    Arter was a punt that backfired.
  • I'm absolutely certain that, if not Lee, Nile John would be preferred to Watson, who is at this point almost entirely and demonstrably useless in any defensive capacity 
  • Leuth said:
    Lee has energy, is combative and has passing range. Who's to say he can't play DM if he retrains for it? 
    In training sessions and matches, players are often asked to play unfamiliar positions.
    One benefit is it can add to the player an exra awareness of those around them and team shape from a different perspective; improve a dimension of their own game, etc.

    That doesn't mean the management team would pick them to play the 1st team in that unfamiliar role - except during injury crisis or other unforeseen situations.

    Although, having said that, we've seen when Jacko took over, he played Clare at CB and the wingers as wingbacks.
    That wouldn't have happened just on whim - he would've seen them try those roles in training first, over a period of time.

    Back to your suggestion: you can bet your life Elliott Lee has aready been made to play DM in training matches. 
    Dobson has been imperious at DM, of course ...... but even in the Pizza Cup, we've never seen Lee take Dobson's place.

    There'll be a reason for that, of course.


  • Sponsored links:


  • Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Dobson and Clare in particular need extending, their contracts (2 year deals to 2023) seem like outliers when Chuks and Fraser are contracted to 2025

    Gilbey and MacG (and indeed Morgan) are less urgent, they need to earn a contract extension.

    Of the ones expiring this summer, I'm not bothered either way about Matthews, Purrington and Washington. Both will do a job in L1, but both are replaceable. With Pearce, I imagine it depends on how much they see him playing next season, and whether we can afford the squad place for a player/coach
    With Washington IMO it's a case of can you realistically get two strikers better than him? 
    Assuming we'll be in L1 next season, I can see us wanting him for another year as he seems a decent guy to have around the place, but he'll want a longer deal
    I think that’s what it’ll come down to. I’ll be concerned if Washington signs a 3 or 4 year deal. If he stays it’s got to be 1 or 2 at most.
    I don't think 2 years would be a problem for most of them tbh.  If you first team is good enough to get promoted your would think most of them could step up. 

    You will already have to replace any loans and a couple that fall out the bottom, for want of a better expression.

    Even this season the players we retained aren't in all honesty the problem. 
    You wouldn’t want to keep Matthews, Gunter, Watson etc though would you?
    Matthews I don't know but would be fine as a squad player. 

    The other 2 of course not but they are not the reason we are 15th.  Gunter played because we didn't get a left back and has hardly played since and Watson only started 6 games partly because Arter wasn't fit for purpose and partly because we only had 3 fit midfielders.  

    Each mistake we made in the summer was magnified by another one. 
    For me that is a problem - we’re stuck with players the manager doesn’t rate. They’re taking up wages and they aren’t pushing others for a place in the team.

    It’s far from the only problem and all these small issues add up and magnify as you say.
    I think of about 26 players we could have coped with two that were under contract anyway.  The ones we resigned haven't really been a major problem either, although I do question some of their characters.

    If the summer recruitment had been better, faster, we wouldn't still be having this conversation.  I think we all agree about that. 
  • Cafc43v3r said:
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Dobson and Clare in particular need extending, their contracts (2 year deals to 2023) seem like outliers when Chuks and Fraser are contracted to 2025

    Gilbey and MacG (and indeed Morgan) are less urgent, they need to earn a contract extension.

    Of the ones expiring this summer, I'm not bothered either way about Matthews, Purrington and Washington. Both will do a job in L1, but both are replaceable. With Pearce, I imagine it depends on how much they see him playing next season, and whether we can afford the squad place for a player/coach
    With Washington IMO it's a case of can you realistically get two strikers better than him? 
    Assuming we'll be in L1 next season, I can see us wanting him for another year as he seems a decent guy to have around the place, but he'll want a longer deal
    I think that’s what it’ll come down to. I’ll be concerned if Washington signs a 3 or 4 year deal. If he stays it’s got to be 1 or 2 at most.
    I don't think 2 years would be a problem for most of them tbh.  If you first team is good enough to get promoted your would think most of them could step up. 

    You will already have to replace any loans and a couple that fall out the bottom, for want of a better expression.

    Even this season the players we retained aren't in all honesty the problem. 
    Not ideal with squad number caps though, and the likes of Gunter and Watson will be earning good wages too.

    Next season the number goes down to 21, so even less scope for "dead wood"

  • Cafc43v3r said:
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Dobson and Clare in particular need extending, their contracts (2 year deals to 2023) seem like outliers when Chuks and Fraser are contracted to 2025

    Gilbey and MacG (and indeed Morgan) are less urgent, they need to earn a contract extension.

    Of the ones expiring this summer, I'm not bothered either way about Matthews, Purrington and Washington. Both will do a job in L1, but both are replaceable. With Pearce, I imagine it depends on how much they see him playing next season, and whether we can afford the squad place for a player/coach
    With Washington IMO it's a case of can you realistically get two strikers better than him? 
    Assuming we'll be in L1 next season, I can see us wanting him for another year as he seems a decent guy to have around the place, but he'll want a longer deal
    I think that’s what it’ll come down to. I’ll be concerned if Washington signs a 3 or 4 year deal. If he stays it’s got to be 1 or 2 at most.
    I don't think 2 years would be a problem for most of them tbh.  If you first team is good enough to get promoted your would think most of them could step up. 

    You will already have to replace any loans and a couple that fall out the bottom, for want of a better expression.

    Even this season the players we retained aren't in all honesty the problem. 
    Not ideal with squad number caps though, and the likes of Gunter and Watson will be earning good wages too.

    Next season the number goes down to 21, so even less scope for "dead wood"

    Makes getting your best academy signed up even more important too.
  • Cafc43v3r said:
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Dobson and Clare in particular need extending, their contracts (2 year deals to 2023) seem like outliers when Chuks and Fraser are contracted to 2025

    Gilbey and MacG (and indeed Morgan) are less urgent, they need to earn a contract extension.

    Of the ones expiring this summer, I'm not bothered either way about Matthews, Purrington and Washington. Both will do a job in L1, but both are replaceable. With Pearce, I imagine it depends on how much they see him playing next season, and whether we can afford the squad place for a player/coach
    With Washington IMO it's a case of can you realistically get two strikers better than him? 
    Assuming we'll be in L1 next season, I can see us wanting him for another year as he seems a decent guy to have around the place, but he'll want a longer deal
    I think that’s what it’ll come down to. I’ll be concerned if Washington signs a 3 or 4 year deal. If he stays it’s got to be 1 or 2 at most.
    I don't think 2 years would be a problem for most of them tbh.  If you first team is good enough to get promoted your would think most of them could step up. 

    You will already have to replace any loans and a couple that fall out the bottom, for want of a better expression.

    Even this season the players we retained aren't in all honesty the problem. 
    Not ideal with squad number caps though, and the likes of Gunter and Watson will be earning good wages too.

    Next season the number goes down to 21, so even less scope for "dead wood"

    Yes and they will both go at the end of the season so it's not a problem is it? 
  • Scoham said:
    For me we need better than Matthews. Ideally we’ll replace him with a first choice RWB with the potential to step up to the Championship. We won’t move forward if we keep players just because they can “do a job”.

    Matthews is perfect for the squad player role, if we're saying bye bye to likes of Matthews, Purrington, Washington because they "do a job" then you're making a massive rebuild, a rebuild that would require 1st and 2nd choices.

    Or alternatively, spunk another 2million+ across 2 windows because there isn't adequate cover/ better 1st choice - Example last summer this Jan.

    Unless of course, we plan on blowing the league away and buying/ paying top 6 players to start and sit on the bench again 😉
  • Leuth said:
    Anyway, for all that I'm on acid or an idiot or whatever, none of you have provided actual reasons for why Lee's skillset or physical abilities disbar him from being capable of playing a DM role. He's not exactly averse to putting in a challenge, is he? I'm not remotely saying he's as good as Dobson, but would you rather him or Watson in there?
    Personally dont think he works hard enough. Happy to get stuck in but he is pretty powder puff and gets knocked off too easily. 

    Could see him like an Andy Reid-esque kind of winger.

    Would prefer Deji in there if that was the case though.
  • edited February 2022
    Uche Ikpeazu has scored eight minutes into his Cardiff debut - a very good goal by all accounts. Not sure if we were ever seriously linked but I thought he would’ve been a good acquisition.

    He came on as a sub for an injured Alfie Doughty. Don’t think Doughty was playing up front, or that Ikpeazu is playing left wing back..!


    Goal: https://streamja.com/0jwq1
  • Scoham said:
    For me we need better than Matthews. Ideally we’ll replace him with a first choice RWB with the potential to step up to the Championship. We won’t move forward if we keep players just because they can “do a job”.

    Matthews is perfect for the squad player role, if we're saying bye bye to likes of Matthews, Purrington, Washington because they "do a job" then you're making a massive rebuild, a rebuild that would require 1st and 2nd choices.

    Or alternatively, spunk another 2million+ across 2 windows because there isn't adequate cover/ better 1st choice - Example last summer this Jan.

    Unless of course, we plan on blowing the league away and buying/ paying top 6 players to start and sit on the bench again 😉
    Not saying we need to get rid of all of that group. I'd probably keep Washington and Purrington, assuming they're happy to be squad players on 1 or 2 year contracts.

    For me Matthews doesn't add enough going forward for that wing back role while Clare and Deji are better suited to being right sided CBs.
  • edited February 2022
    AddickRam said:
    With TS talking about the possibility of bringing in a free agent striker, what do our squad numbers look like now?

    Where would Marcus Browne have sat?
    No one has responded to my question - Could someone please kindly answer the question: Where would Marcus Browne have appeared in our formation?  I want to get a sense of where Gallen JJ and co feel we finished the window light in.

    Edit: Open the previous quote above to see formation.
  • Leuth said:
    Anyway, for all that I'm on acid or an idiot or whatever, none of you have provided actual reasons for why Lee's skillset or physical abilities disbar him from being capable of playing a DM role. He's not exactly averse to putting in a challenge, is he? I'm not remotely saying he's as good as Dobson, but would you rather him or Watson in there?
    Personally dont think he works hard enough. Happy to get stuck in but he is pretty powder puff and gets knocked off too easily. 

    Could see him like an Andy Reid-esque kind of winger.

    Would prefer Deji in there if that was the case though.
    I think it would be tough to reposition him to a DM on the basis that I don’t see him doing the legwork to mop up in the way Dobson does.  You (leuth) yourself, like me didn’t really enjoy watching Pratley or Watson as a DM.  I’m not saying Lee would be anywhere as immobile as those two have been (at the back end of their careers), but I can’t really see him physically covering the pitch, putting the tackles in.  If you want him as a low lying Pirlo type player, then again, I think players have to be very, very good to do that.  Seems to be a bit of a disease in the game where you’ve got average midfielders that have grown up watching Pirlo, Scholes etc spray long passes around the pitch and try to match those ‘Hollywood balls’

    JFC and Morgan both guilty of it.  They’re okay players, but have a misplaced arrogance thinking they can execute those type of balls on a regular basis.  One in every 20 or so come off.  
  • Sponsored links:


  • Elerewe at DM is a good shout actually 
  • Elewere at cdm is a terrible shout - i'm fairly certain that nile john is cover for dobson 
  • DOUCHER said:
    Elewere at cdm is a terrible shout - i'm fairly certain that nile john is cover for dobson 
    Agreed. And failing that, Clare, Gilbey, even Albie would be better than having Lee there.
  • DOUCHER said:
    Elewere at cdm is a terrible shout - i'm fairly certain that nile john is cover for dobson 

    From what I've been told is that John is a very versatile midfielder capable of playing most positions/roles and is capable of using both feet. 

    But his main asset is his pace and drive with a football to exploit space so for him to sit, slide and screen our defence I'm not so sure. 

    Wondering if Jake is going play this season and if he could cover that position. 

    It's definitely one role we need cover for in the summer. 
  • Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Dobson and Clare in particular need extending, their contracts (2 year deals to 2023) seem like outliers when Chuks and Fraser are contracted to 2025

    Gilbey and MacG (and indeed Morgan) are less urgent, they need to earn a contract extension.

    Of the ones expiring this summer, I'm not bothered either way about Matthews, Purrington and Washington. Both will do a job in L1, but both are replaceable. With Pearce, I imagine it depends on how much they see him playing next season, and whether we can afford the squad place for a player/coach
    With Washington IMO it's a case of can you realistically get two strikers better than him? 
    Assuming we'll be in L1 next season, I can see us wanting him for another year as he seems a decent guy to have around the place, but he'll want a longer deal
    I think that’s what it’ll come down to. I’ll be concerned if Washington signs a 3 or 4 year deal. If he stays it’s got to be 1 or 2 at most.
    I don't think 2 years would be a problem for most of them tbh.  If you first team is good enough to get promoted your would think most of them could step up. 

    You will already have to replace any loans and a couple that fall out the bottom, for want of a better expression.

    Even this season the players we retained aren't in all honesty the problem. 
    You wouldn’t want to keep Matthews, Gunter, Watson etc though would you?
    Matthews can be a good player for us. 
    Has been a good player for us in a fair few games, defensively is one of the better players 1v1. Its weather he gets a consistent run of games and can adapt to the wing back role. 
  • AddickRam said:
    With TS talking about the possibility of bringing in a free agent striker, what do our squad numbers look like now?

    Where would Marcus Browne have sat?
    No one has responded to my question - Could someone please kindly answer the question: Where would Marcus Browne have appeared in our formation?  I want to get a sense of where Gallen JJ and co feel we finished the window light in.

    Edit: Open the previous quote above to see formation.
    Browne would have been an option as either one of the front two, or in the Elliott Lee role behind the strikers
  • Scoham said:
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Dobson and Clare in particular need extending, their contracts (2 year deals to 2023) seem like outliers when Chuks and Fraser are contracted to 2025

    Gilbey and MacG (and indeed Morgan) are less urgent, they need to earn a contract extension.

    Of the ones expiring this summer, I'm not bothered either way about Matthews, Purrington and Washington. Both will do a job in L1, but both are replaceable. With Pearce, I imagine it depends on how much they see him playing next season, and whether we can afford the squad place for a player/coach
    With Washington IMO it's a case of can you realistically get two strikers better than him? 
    Assuming we'll be in L1 next season, I can see us wanting him for another year as he seems a decent guy to have around the place, but he'll want a longer deal
    I think that’s what it’ll come down to. I’ll be concerned if Washington signs a 3 or 4 year deal. If he stays it’s got to be 1 or 2 at most.
    I don't think 2 years would be a problem for most of them tbh.  If you first team is good enough to get promoted your would think most of them could step up. 

    You will already have to replace any loans and a couple that fall out the bottom, for want of a better expression.

    Even this season the players we retained aren't in all honesty the problem. 
    You wouldn’t want to keep Matthews, Gunter, Watson etc though would you?
    Matthews can be a good player for us. 
    Can but doesn’t do it often enough. I’d rather bring in a player we can be more certain about, especially as we don’t have a natural right wing back - everyone who plays there is more comfortable as a full back or winger.
    Matthews doesn't give two shits about this club. He only performs as his contract runs down. 

    He's only second to Taylor in recent players I initially liked so much to only despise. He's clearly a good footballer, but puts in little to no effort.
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Scoham said:
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Scoham said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Dobson and Clare in particular need extending, their contracts (2 year deals to 2023) seem like outliers when Chuks and Fraser are contracted to 2025

    Gilbey and MacG (and indeed Morgan) are less urgent, they need to earn a contract extension.

    Of the ones expiring this summer, I'm not bothered either way about Matthews, Purrington and Washington. Both will do a job in L1, but both are replaceable. With Pearce, I imagine it depends on how much they see him playing next season, and whether we can afford the squad place for a player/coach
    With Washington IMO it's a case of can you realistically get two strikers better than him? 
    Assuming we'll be in L1 next season, I can see us wanting him for another year as he seems a decent guy to have around the place, but he'll want a longer deal
    I think that’s what it’ll come down to. I’ll be concerned if Washington signs a 3 or 4 year deal. If he stays it’s got to be 1 or 2 at most.
    I don't think 2 years would be a problem for most of them tbh.  If you first team is good enough to get promoted your would think most of them could step up. 

    You will already have to replace any loans and a couple that fall out the bottom, for want of a better expression.

    Even this season the players we retained aren't in all honesty the problem. 
    You wouldn’t want to keep Matthews, Gunter, Watson etc though would you?
    Matthews can be a good player for us. 
    Can but doesn’t do it often enough. I’d rather bring in a player we can be more certain about, especially as we don’t have a natural right wing back - everyone who plays there is more comfortable as a full back or winger.
    Matthews doesn't give two shits about this club. He only performs as his contract runs down. 

    He's only second to Taylor in recent players I initially liked so much to only despise. He's clearly a good footballer, but puts in little to no effort.
    One of those players that seems to have his fans no matter what he does. Surely his time is up, now. 
  • AddickRam said:
    With TS talking about the possibility of bringing in a free agent striker, what do our squad numbers look like now?

    Where would Marcus Browne have sat?
    No one has responded to my question - Could someone please kindly answer the question: Where would Marcus Browne have appeared in our formation?  I want to get a sense of where Gallen JJ and co feel we finished the window light in.

    Edit: Open the previous quote above to see formation.
    I may (obviously!) be totally misreading the situation, but seems too much of a coincidence that we lost our interest in Browne  at the same time we put in a formal bid on Fraser. My guess is we caught an unexpected sniff Fraser was potentially available and switched focus as he was our #1 target. I expect Browne would've filled the same role. 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!