Charlton and Sandgaard in particular can't ever win with loads of keyboard worriers on here Yes Chuks fancied his chances at the higher level. Brum took him on at least partly cos he was relatively cheap, they're broke don't forget. Despite Brum's shabby season, Chuks has barely featured, even for a manager that knows him well and used him as much as he could for us. For my 2pworth, using up a squad place on a 28y.o. lump who's never got his fitness up to scratch, even for 3rd division football, looks like a foolishly risky strategy. Against that we have to concede that IF you can get him on the pitch, as a sub, his impact and goalscoring record is worth having. I never saw him put in any sort of performance when starting games, which is a major worry when our chief striker is out indefinitely. Awkward timing when the gaffer is singing Mason Burstow's praises in the press. Wednesday night our only attacking option on the bench was MB, all the while Leko was stinking the place up Jacko's hands were tied. Chuks could have been the man for the moment Wednesday night, but we'd hope those situations only arose once or twice a season. I hope Chuks makes me eat my words by starting 20 games and hitting double figures in goals by May. Breath not held. Oh yeah one more thing WIOTOS
I think a lot of people are just generally fed up mate.
Life is pretty shit for many of us at the moment and at the same time the last few weeks for Charlton have been pretty depressing. The other night was awful and pretty much the nail in our season. Glasses are probably a bit more half empty than normal.
That's certainly perked up my anticipation for the Cheltenham game tomorrow.
I do worry about his endurance, but as a player, he's excellent at this level. 3.5 years is a big commitment too, considering the 2 year deals he previously had with us and at Brum. The security of a longer contract was one of the reasons he, I imagine, took a pay cut to come back.
The limp performance on Wednesday concentrated a few minds at the club I imagine...
I think a lot of people are just generally fed up mate.
Life is pretty shit for many of us at the moment and at the same time the last few weeks for Charlton have been pretty depressing. The other night was awful and pretty much the nail in our season. Glasses are probably a bit more half empty than normal.
Times are tough indeed. The recent performances have been poor that's also true. But it's about building for next season and finishing this one strong.
We need a lot of things to change but Chuks brings many positives and strengths with him so we should be seeing this as a positive. He may not be the silver bullet but he's definitely an improvement to the squad
I think Jacko being the manager also helped his decision. Looking forward to watching him play. Most defenders at this level have no idea how to play against him.
That's certainly perked up my anticipation for the Cheltenham game tomorrow.
I do worry about his endurance, but as a player, he's excellent at this level. 3.5 years is a big commitment too, considering the 2 year deals he previously had with us and at Brum. The security of a longer contract was one of the reasons he, I imagine, took a pay cut to come back.
The limp performance on Wednesday concentrated a few minds at the club I imagine...
That would be interesting to learn i.e. was it happening quietly under the radar anyway or did we up our offer/terms as a consequence?
That's certainly perked up my anticipation for the Cheltenham game tomorrow.
I do worry about his endurance, but as a player, he's excellent at this level. 3.5 years is a big commitment too, considering the 2 year deals he previously had with us and at Brum. The security of a longer contract was one of the reasons he, I imagine, took a pay cut to come back.
The limp performance on Wednesday concentrated a few minds at the club I imagine...
he probably did take a pay cut to come back but probably a pay rise compared to last year. He should have a nice signing on fee from the birmingham move and they could be paying some of his wages still or paid him off as he was under contract (last comment based on football manager so might not be accurate).
Personally i love Chuks, he was probably my favourite player last season so i'm happy to see him back as it strengthens the squad.
On the flip side of that though, i have to say that i think a 3.5 year deal for someone with his fitness issues is mental. However i guess he probably wouldn't have signed without a longer deal on offer.
That's certainly perked up my anticipation for the Cheltenham game tomorrow.
I do worry about his endurance, but as a player, he's excellent at this level. 3.5 years is a big commitment too, considering the 2 year deals he previously had with us and at Brum. The security of a longer contract was one of the reasons he, I imagine, took a pay cut to come back.
The limp performance on Wednesday concentrated a few minds at the club I imagine...
That would be interesting to learn i.e. was it happening quietly under the radar anyway or did we up our offer/terms as a consequence?
Personally i love Chuks, he was probably my favourite player last season so i'm happy to see him back as it strengthens the squad.
On the flip side of that though, i have to say that i think a 3.5 year deal for someone with his fitness issues is mental. However i guess he probably wouldn't have signed without a longer deal on offer.
I’m not really focused on the financials as none of us will know the details.
But from a team / squad perspective, if it’s a permanent deal then is Chuks a player that will improve our squad with an eye to delivering a promotion season next year?
Do people think the answer to that is yes?
So I’ve thought a bit about my question above and at this time I think it’s undoubted that he will improve our squad. Bit due to his fitness record theres a nagging question mark if he’s the right man to build a side around thats aiming for promotion.
Overall I’m happy to have him added to the squad. one things for sure, our forthcoming opponents would much rather NOT be playing against him, that I’m sure, and that’s a positive.
That's certainly perked up my anticipation for the Cheltenham game tomorrow.
I do worry about his endurance, but as a player, he's excellent at this level. 3.5 years is a big commitment too, considering the 2 year deals he previously had with us and at Brum. The security of a longer contract was one of the reasons he, I imagine, took a pay cut to come back.
The limp performance on Wednesday concentrated a few minds at the club I imagine...
That would be interesting to learn i.e. was it happening quietly under the radar anyway or did we up our offer/terms as a consequence?
They'd never admit it publicly, but I'd be amazed if they didn't really ramp up efforts to get him (or someone) in before Cheltenham as a result of our defeat, whereas if we had say won 1-0, might not have rushed it through
I think Jacko being the manager also helped his decision. Looking forward to watching him play. Most defenders at this level have no idea how to play against him.
And that is something we don’t have. Our attacking play is so predictable. Even Aneke doesn’t know what he is going to do.
Personally i love Chuks, he was probably my favourite player last season so i'm happy to see him back as it strengthens the squad.
On the flip side of that though, i have to say that i think a 3.5 year deal for someone with his fitness issues is mental. However i guess he probably wouldn't have signed without a longer deal on offer.
my thought exactly ..
echo that.
he's had us over & pulled our pants down into the bargain.
Personally i love Chuks, he was probably my favourite player last season so i'm happy to see him back as it strengthens the squad.
On the flip side of that though, i have to say that i think a 3.5 year deal for someone with his fitness issues is mental. However i guess he probably wouldn't have signed without a longer deal on offer.
Personally i love Chuks, he was probably my favourite player last season so i'm happy to see him back as it strengthens the squad.
On the flip side of that though, i have to say that i think a 3.5 year deal for someone with his fitness issues is mental. However i guess he probably wouldn't have signed without a longer deal on offer.
my thought exactly ..
echo that.
he's had us over & pulled our pants down into the bargain.
Surely the person who offered the contract is the one who has had our pants down (if that proves the case).
Well if his stint at Birmingham is anything to go by it is clear he is not a Championship striker so if promotion is our aim I assume he will be an impact sub if and when we get up during his 3.5 year contract.
I’m not really focused on the financials as none of us will know the details.
But from a team / squad perspective, if it’s a permanent deal then is Chuks a player that will improve our squad with an eye to delivering a promotion season next year?
Do people think the answer to that is yes?
So I’ve thought a bit about my question above and at this time I think it’s undoubted that he will improve our squad. Bit due to his fitness record theres a nagging question mark if he’s the right man to build a side around thats aiming for promotion.
Overall I’m happy to have him added to the squad. one things for sure, our forthcoming opponents would much rather NOT be playing against him, that I’m sure, and that’s a positive.
But assuming we will "build the side around him" seems to be putting the cart before the horses.
I certainly would not want him to be the main striker for a whole season based on his fitness record etc, but a defence that's been roughed up by Stockley and chased Washington for 60-70 minutes or so is not going to want to deal with Aneke being bought on.
I think that this is seen primarily as a squad signing rather than to be the focal point of the squad, so I do agree that he's a benefit overall.
Comments
'The 28-year-old trained with the men’s first team on Friday morning and will be available for Saturday’s trip to Cheltenham.'
Do they sometimes train with the women / Ladies team then ?!!
Happy the big man is back. Pick up where you left off!!
BUT
As hopefully the first signing of several, I'm genuinely pleased to see him back.
Yes he is
I do worry about his endurance, but as a player, he's excellent at this level. 3.5 years is a big commitment too, considering the 2 year deals he previously had with us and at Brum. The security of a longer contract was one of the reasons he, I imagine, took a pay cut to come back.
The limp performance on Wednesday concentrated a few minds at the club I imagine...
Fingers crossed it works out!
We need a lot of things to change but Chuks brings many positives and strengths with him so we should be seeing this as a positive. He may not be the silver bullet but he's definitely an improvement to the squad
On the flip side of that though, i have to say that i think a 3.5 year deal for someone with his fitness issues is mental. However i guess he probably wouldn't have signed without a longer deal on offer.
he's had us over & pulled our pants down into the bargain.
I certainly would not want him to be the main striker for a whole season based on his fitness record etc, but a defence that's been roughed up by Stockley and chased Washington for 60-70 minutes or so is not going to want to deal with Aneke being bought on.
I think that this is seen primarily as a squad signing rather than to be the focal point of the squad, so I do agree that he's a benefit overall.