Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket 2022

1140141142143145

Comments

  • Cafc43v3r said:
    Leuth said:
    Athers pointing out that NZ is actually the next Test, and that a swerve to Jennings or Bairstow is still possible if their pacers trouble him
    I think Jennings would only play in the sub continent.  Averages over 40, against less than 20 elsewhere.  Pope to open and YJB back is probably the next cab off the rank.
    They would far sooner ask Bairstow to open than Pope
  • So does Ahmed get MOM assuming we win?

    Likely candidates:

    Ahmed 7-148
    Leach 7-212
    Brook 111
    Duckett 26 & 42* (with potentially more to come)
  • Cafc43v3r said:
    Leuth said:
    Athers pointing out that NZ is actually the next Test, and that a swerve to Jennings or Bairstow is still possible if their pacers trouble him
    I think Jennings would only play in the sub continent.  Averages over 40, against less than 20 elsewhere.  Pope to open and YJB back is probably the next cab off the rank.
    I think they'll be reluctant to move Pope from 3 given how that's been a problem position for so long and how well he has taken to it. They were talking about Brook as an option to open back in the summer. It's not something I would do but if they're looking to get Bairstow back in the side then thats an option. 
  • Leuth said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Leuth said:
    Athers pointing out that NZ is actually the next Test, and that a swerve to Jennings or Bairstow is still possible if their pacers trouble him
    I think Jennings would only play in the sub continent.  Averages over 40, against less than 20 elsewhere.  Pope to open and YJB back is probably the next cab off the rank.
    They would far sooner ask Bairstow to open than Pope
    I don't think YJB will actually be fit for NZ so it's a bit irrelevant anyway.  Interesting how they do fit him in, he had that no 6 role nailed down for years when he got injured.

    Hard to believe this was less than a year ago.  With almost the same team

    Result
    England vs Australia, 3rd Test
    England tour of Australia

    ENG 185 & 68
    AUS 267
    Australia won by an innings and 14 runs

  • So does Ahmed get MOM assuming we win?

    Likely candidates:

    Ahmed 7-148
    Leach 7-212
    Brook 111
    Duckett 26 & 42* (with potentially more to come)
    Feel like it'll be Ahmed, with Brook MOTS obv, and Duckett unlucky to not be awarded
  • I can't help thinking that the one bloke who hasn't, perhaps, had the true recognition he deserves is Duckett. He now has in the series 304 runs at an average of 60.80 and that hasn't been as a result of one big innings. The Ashes will be the next Test but when was the last time that we had someone who looked as comfortable as he has opening? 
    Opening here, when you're often facing spin from the off is a very different challenge to the normal challenges of opening the batting! Especially a Pakistan team with one of their weakest ever pace attacks.
  • Umpires doing the best they can to stop this finishing this evening. 
  • This will be England's first win for 15 years without Broad OR Anderson!
  • Umpires doing the best they can to stop this finishing this evening. 
    Giving correct lbws?
  • Nightwatchman  ?????
  • Sponsored links:


  • Ahahaha nightMURDERER morelike
  • Perhaps not  😄😄😄😄
  • I had a sneaky feeling he'd go up the order second time
  • Sent in the nightslogger 
  • Did say that McCullum told Ahmed to go out and just hit it in the first innings. And he's done the same here.
  • I'm sure if we really wanted to go for it Brook would have been the better option. 
  • Leuth said:
    Umpires doing the best they can to stop this finishing this evening. 
    Giving correct lbws?
    No, showing lbw appeals from previous overs.

    Took them a little while to adjudicate on the right lbw appeal. 
  • Leuth said:
    Umpires doing the best they can to stop this finishing this evening. 
    Giving correct lbws?
    No, showing lbw appeals from previous overs.

    Took them a little while to adjudicate on the right lbw appeal. 
    That's true, that was a bit silly
  • At least he now has more runs than wickets 
  • That was daft tbh, was playing the straight bat shots so well. Come down and hit straight
  • Sponsored links:


  • Oh look ffs lol look who it is now
  • 70 off 50 needed.
  • edited December 2022
    At least he now has more runs than wickets 
    Still dont think they will try and get them tonight? 

    Edit that jinxed it.  Booo
  • Cafc43v3r said:
    At least he now has more runs than wickets 
    Still dont think they will try and get them tonight? 

    Edit that jinxed it.  Booo
    Absolutely no idea tbh
    😂😂
  • Stokes ffs lmao
  • Not finding easy to hit anything atm.

    Reckon they will be off at the end of this over 
  • Another 50 (38) for Duckett making it three 50s plus one ton from six innings in the series
  • 112-2 off 17 overs at close with just 55 to win

    Duckett 50* (38)
    Stokes 10* (15)
  • A word for Abrar. Made his debut in the last Test and he has the most wickets in the series despite playing only two matches. He has taken 17 wickets at 25.11 and the next best is Leach with 15 at 44.60
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!