Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket 2022

1969799101102146

Comments

  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,788
    S Africa 48-3, why are we trying to change the ball? 
    The misshape is probably an excuse as they probably think the ball's gone a bit soft following the overnight rain and want a harder one. 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,788
    edited August 2022
    Cor! Umpire's call on impact outside the line and hitting the stumps!
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,788
    77-5 at lunch

    Our session and poor decision by SA to bat
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,348
    why Leach when the quickies have done all the damage ?

  • 77-5 at lunch

    Our session and poor decision by SA to bat
    I’d reserve that comment until we have batted.
  • billysboots
    billysboots Posts: 1,596
    Just to have a look at the pitch and give the batsmen something else to think about.
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,348
    MrOneLung said:
    FFS Robinson. 
    No sympathy whatsoever
    No balls should be 10 runs to opponents and a 30 minute ban from bowling. 

    Absolutely no need for it at all. 
    seems the Robbo no ball was not in fact a no ball ? .. being called a communication breakdown tween umpires
    it was a no ball .. listening with half an ear I thought the TV commentators said it was a mis-call by the 3rd umpire .. wheres that hearing aid ?
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,788
    MrOneLung said:
    FFS Robinson. 
    No sympathy whatsoever
    No balls should be 10 runs to opponents and a 30 minute ban from bowling. 

    Absolutely no need for it at all. 
    Darren Gough has said many times that he cannot understand what they are trying to gain. The plus of pushing it is of infinitely less value than losing a wicket because of overstepping. Spinners have got an even less excuse for doing so but some still do. They probably do it in the nets and all forms of the game and aren't penalised for doing so but then get to international cricket finding that they lose a victim. We see it, on average, at least once in every Test and that can be the difference between winning and losing.

    That's four no balls we've bowled in 28 overs so one in every 7 overs on average. Our greatest ever bowler, Anderson, bowls one every 150 overs on average.
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,675
    MrOneLung said:
    FFS Robinson. 
    No sympathy whatsoever
    No balls should be 10 runs to opponents and a 30 minute ban from bowling. 

    Absolutely no need for it at all. 
    Darren Gough has said many times that he cannot understand what they are trying to gain. The plus of pushing it is of infinitely less value than losing a wicket because of overstepping. Spinners have got an even less excuse for doing so but some still do. They probably do it in the nets and all forms of the game and aren't penalised for doing so but then get to international cricket finding that they lose a victim. We see it, on average, at least once in every Test and that can be the difference between winning and losing.

    That's four no balls we've bowled in 28 overs so one in every 7 overs on average. Our greatest ever bowler, Anderson, bowls one every 150 overs on average.
    I can't remember who it was but one of the commentary team on Sky a couple of years ago said when he watched the England bowlers in the nets that they would regularly bowl no balls. 
    They were only interested in where the ball finished. 
    If no one is pulling them up for bowling no balls in the nets it's no suprise they do it When it matters. 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,788
    Oh Jimmy, Jimmy!!!

    92-7
  • Sponsored links:



  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    It's as if Jimmy and Broady didn't bowl as well as they usually do in the last Test due to being undercooked
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,788
    MrOneLung said:
    FFS Robinson. 
    No sympathy whatsoever
    No balls should be 10 runs to opponents and a 30 minute ban from bowling. 

    Absolutely no need for it at all. 
    Darren Gough has said many times that he cannot understand what they are trying to gain. The plus of pushing it is of infinitely less value than losing a wicket because of overstepping. Spinners have got an even less excuse for doing so but some still do. They probably do it in the nets and all forms of the game and aren't penalised for doing so but then get to international cricket finding that they lose a victim. We see it, on average, at least once in every Test and that can be the difference between winning and losing.

    That's four no balls we've bowled in 28 overs so one in every 7 overs on average. Our greatest ever bowler, Anderson, bowls one every 150 overs on average.
    I can't remember who it was but one of the commentary team on Sky a couple of years ago said when he watched the England bowlers in the nets that they would regularly bowl no balls. 
    They were only interested in where the ball finished. 
    If no one is pulling them up for bowling no balls in the nets it's no suprise they do it When it matters. 
    They do it all the time in the nets to gain an advantage over the batsmen as much because they feel that they are on a hiding for nothing with no fielders in place.

    The captain at my son's club, Bickley Park, bowls off 18 yards in the nets. He's an Aussie who has played against England and was at one time the quickest in the Kent League. He isn't slow now by any means (probably 82mph plus) but does it to test the first team batsmen because if they can handle that they can handle anything directed at them on a Saturday! 


  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,673
    There are plenty frustrating things with this England side. But our inability to clear up a tail is right up there. I'm already getting twitchy 
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,675
    There are plenty frustrating things with this England side. But our inability to clear up a tail is right up there. I'm already getting twitchy 
    Twitch over.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,788
    There are plenty frustrating things with this England side. But our inability to clear up a tail is right up there. I'm already getting twitchy 
    Twitch over.
    Still two wickets to take..............
  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,673
    There are plenty frustrating things with this England side. But our inability to clear up a tail is right up there. I'm already getting twitchy 
    Twitch over.
    Until its over I can't settle. And then I have to watch our openers have a go... 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    There are plenty frustrating things with this England side. But our inability to clear up a tail is right up there. I'm already getting twitchy 
    Twitch over.
    Until its over I can't settle. And then I have to watch our openers have a go... 
    Well at least you won't have to worry about Zak's batting for very long...
  • why Leach when the quickies have done all the damage ?

    Improve over rate, more balls before lunch to increase pressure?
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,675
    There are plenty frustrating things with this England side. But our inability to clear up a tail is right up there. I'm already getting twitchy 
    Twitch over.
    Until its over I can't settle. And then I have to watch our openers have a go... 
    Watching our openers bat will have us all twitching for about 15 minutes. 
    Then we can settle down and watch the middle order. 
  • There are plenty frustrating things with this England side. But our inability to clear up a tail is right up there. I'm already getting twitchy 
    Twitch over

    Damn ! Thought that was my Tingle starting to stir.
  • Sponsored links:



  • There are plenty frustrating things with this England side. But our inability to clear up a tail is right up there. I'm already getting twitchy 
    Twitch over.
    Until its over I can't settle. And then I have to watch our openers have a go... 
    Watching our openers bat will have us all twitching for about 15 minutes. 
    Then we can settle down and watch the middle order. 
    Hope our Zak makes sure to wear his brown pants.....
  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,673
    Even we clear them up from here, we've still let Rabada top score
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,788
    Even we clear them up from here, we've still let Rabada top score
    I knew that I should have lumped on him at 100/1 to be top SA first innings run scorer!!!
  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,673
    Even we clear them up from here, we've still let Rabada top score
    I knew that I should have lumped on him at 100/1 to be top SA first innings run scorer!!!
    Blimey 100/1 is always worth a punt! 
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,675
    Even we clear them up from here, we've still let Rabada top score
    I have to agree with you here.
    We have lost the plot the last hour.
  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,673
    Our tail offer absolutely nothing either. We always get cleared up for basically nothing
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,788
    Even we clear them up from here, we've still let Rabada top score
    I knew that I should have lumped on him at 100/1 to be top SA first innings run scorer!!!
    Blimey 100/1 is always worth a punt! 

    Trouble is that Rabada has a Test average of under 12 and a highest score in any form of the game of 48 from 340 innings. We are, potentially, allowing him to beat that!
  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,673
    If they get more than 175 we've had a complete and utter shocker 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    Even we clear them up from here, we've still let Rabada top score
    I knew that I should have lumped on him at 100/1 to be top SA first innings run scorer!!!
    Blimey 100/1 is always worth a punt! 

    Trouble is that Rabada has a Test average of under 12 and a highest score in any form of the game of 48 from 340 innings. We are, potentially, allowing him to beat that!
    That average would be a lot higher if he could play England every match  :D
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,001
    I'd like to thank the person who came up with this wonderful new strategy for the bowlers to aim at the stumps.