Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Post-match Thread: Sheffield Wednesday vs Charlton Athletic | Saturday 26th February 2022

145679

Comments

  • JamesSeed said:
    Bannan is the 'out ball' for Wednesday and they would struggle without him.
    We don't have an 'out ball' as none of our midfield are comfortable in possession. Hence we pass it around aimlessly or hoof it forward.
    JFC would be closest we have, but obviously he will always be injured.
    I think Fraser will fit the bill. Hopefully. 
    I'd settle for cloning Bannan TBH. 

    Haven't felt so negative about our team for a very long time as I did after the final whistle yesterday. Sunderland must be rubbing their hands together at the prospect of beating their nemesis next Saturday.

    The heart seems to have disappeared from our lads. And it's extremely hard to admit that. 

    If only it was as "simple" as getting a couple of our walking wounded back ....but worryingly, I feel the malaise goes deeper. 

    Normally, I love away days with our group & it's never been totally about the football. 

    But, after Wimbledon, it's going to take more than the wine, the camaraderie & the laughs to tempt us to travel those miles once again this season. 

    Both the spirit AND the body is getting weaker, match by match. 

    ( Poor old souls !) 
    I know exactly what you mean 🙁
  • Stayed over with my mate and we sampled the Gardeners Rest, Salt Bao and the Kelham Island Tavern. All really good and really enjoyed it. Owls fans we spoke to were friendly, and we both thought 2-0 was about right, would have been nice to nick a consolation goal for that all important goal difference but not to be. Match was awful, but you all know that. Referee was terrible, when you support Charlton you have to go away to see a ref who's a Homer cos we never seem to get them. 

    Things have to change or we're going down, no leadership on the pitch, no fight. I'd give the captaincy to Lavelle or Morgan with a challenge that they need to show that leadership. 
  • Bannon is the kind of player, that when he plays well Wednesday win. As others have said, he is a joy to watch. His reported £40k a week would probably cover our first 11 wages, no doubt, but quality costs, even at league one level. Sadly football is not just pricing fans out, but it's also pricing owners out.

    I wasn't too gutted yesterday as I got to have a chat with Kev, the landlord of the New Barrack Tavern. He was in hospital for months last year and pulled through when it hadn't seemed likely, so that made my day.

    To point out from my earlier post, I said I thought Jacko would be gone in the summer, it's not what I want (I hold him in similar regard as SCP), it's more what I expect to happen. Sandgaard is proving to be a shrewd businessman and I think he will want success no matter what and if somebody doesn't bring it, then they will be gone. 
  • JamesSeed said:
    Bannan is the 'out ball' for Wednesday and they would struggle without him.
    We don't have an 'out ball' as none of our midfield are comfortable in possession. Hence we pass it around aimlessly or hoof it forward.
    JFC would be closest we have, but obviously he will always be injured.
    I think Fraser will fit the bill. Hopefully. 
    I'd settle for cloning Bannan TBH. 

    Haven't felt so negative about our team for a very long time as I did after the final whistle yesterday. Sunderland must be rubbing their hands together at the prospect of beating their nemesis next Saturday.

    The heart seems to have disappeared from our lads. And it's extremely hard to admit that. 

    If only it was as "simple" as getting a couple of our walking wounded back ....but worryingly, I feel the malaise goes deeper. 

    Normally, I love away days with our group & it's never been totally about the football. 

    But, after Wimbledon, it's going to take more than the wine, the camaraderie & the laughs to tempt us to travel those miles once again this season. 

    Both the spirit AND the body is getting weaker, match by match. 

    ( Poor old souls !) 
    And when Fanny looses her tingle Thomas really has to sit up and take notice. Even the diehards are losing heart. Bad times. 
  • JamesSeed said:
    Bannan is the 'out ball' for Wednesday and they would struggle without him.
    We don't have an 'out ball' as none of our midfield are comfortable in possession. Hence we pass it around aimlessly or hoof it forward.
    JFC would be closest we have, but obviously he will always be injured.
    I think Fraser will fit the bill. Hopefully. 
    I'd settle for cloning Bannan TBH. 

    Haven't felt so negative about our team for a very long time as I did after the final whistle yesterday. Sunderland must be rubbing their hands together at the prospect of beating their nemesis next Saturday.

    The heart seems to have disappeared from our lads. And it's extremely hard to admit that. 

    If only it was as "simple" as getting a couple of our walking wounded back ....but worryingly, I feel the malaise goes deeper. 

    Normally, I love away days with our group & it's never been totally about the football. 

    But, after Wimbledon, it's going to take more than the wine, the camaraderie & the laughs to tempt us to travel those miles once again this season. 

    Both the spirit AND the body is getting weaker, match by match. 

    ( Poor old souls !) 
    And when Fanny looses her tingle Thomas really has to sit up and take notice. Even the diehards are losing heart. Bad times. 
    Blimey, SB ! 

    I'd totally forgotten I ever HAD a Tingle ! 

    Those were the days, eh. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Ben18 said:
    With the exception of the re-start after conceding, we didn’t complete a pass until after 8 minutes.
    That is mental 
  • Sorry to be dumb, but do you mean it took 8 minutes for one CAFC player to successfully kick the ball to another CAFC player? 
  • Sorry to be dumb, but do you mean it took 8 minutes for one CAFC player to successfully kick the ball to another CAFC player? 
    Sadly I think he does. I noticed after two or three minutes we’d had zero possession, but didn’t realise it lasted 8. 
  • I mentioned it earlier but I think Bannan is a joy to watch at this level. Amongst a sea of hoof it merchants and work horses and is head and shoulders above anyone on the pitch. Constantly looks for the ball, even it tight areas. always in space when he receives the ball so his back 4 don’t have to lump it all the time and drives forward. How many intricate little first time passes did he play down the side of our defenders yesterday. The thing is that Gilbey and Lee looked like they could get to that level against Plymouth and Ipswich, now look at them. I’m sure he’s on a big wedge but he is a massive difference at this grade of football.
    And on a pudding of a pitch, he would have ripped us to shreds on a decent surface.
  • Mason should have put Stockley through for that chance. It's one thing having your forwards back, it's another knowing how to dovetail and use eachother. 
  • Burstow plays like an U-23 player. He is as innefective and easy to defend against, for an experienced defender/s, as it is possible to be. He is learning and this will make him a better player as I don't doubt his potential, but why is he learning at our expense? 
  • Burstow plays like an U-23 player. He is as innefective and easy to defend against, for an experienced defender/s, as it is possible to be. He is learning and this will make him a better player as I don't doubt his potential, but why is he learning at our expense? 
    Completely agree but you know the answer to the question. 3 forwards out. Leko not turning up in L1. A sale and loan clause so we weren't too light up front. All a bit haphazard. 
  • Oggy Red said:
    Burstow plays like an U-23 player. He is as innefective and easy to defend against, for an experienced defender/s, as it is possible to be. He is learning and this will make him a better player as I don't doubt his potential, but why is he learning at our expense? 
    Because on this recent poor run, there has been litterally no other striker available, perhaps?


    Yes, but if you have a player playing that doesn't benefit you, why not play another who doesn't benefit you but may give you a longer term benefit.
  • Sponsored links:


  • There are two big lumps in the under 23s - Hady  Ghandour and the other, Wassim. Must be worth a try.

  • daveroan said:
    There are two big lumps in the under 23s - Hady  Ghandour and the other, Wassim. Must be worth a try.

    Are they young enough to not have to be in the squad? 
  • Wouldn't quite call them lumps. Both had a month on loan in non-league this season, but without the clubs renewing them for another month.
  • Sam Lavelle@Samlavelle5 · Feb 27
    We’d all be tweeting if we’d won 5 in a row so I think it’s only right to come on here now. Massive thanks to the travelling fans yesterday and apologies for that team performance. I can only say we’ll be working as hard as possible from now until Saturday to put this right👊🏼💪🏼 twitter.com/cafcofficial/s…
  • Sorry if this has already been covered.

    We bought on a 4th sub because Mathews went off concussed, but then Weds brought on a 4th sub, why? ...... the law says that when one team brings on a concussion sub, the other team can do so as well. What a ridiculous law
  • daveroan said:
    There are two big lumps in the under 23s - Hady  Ghandour and the other, Wassim. Must be worth a try.

    Not seen Wassim but from the very limited bits I've seen of Ghandour I think he's closer to being 'lightweight' than a 'big lump'.
  • edited February 2022
    ross1 said:
    Sam Lavelle@Samlavelle5 · Feb 27
    We’d all be tweeting if we’d won 5 in a row so I think it’s only right to come on here now. Massive thanks to the travelling fans yesterday and apologies for that team performance. I can only say we’ll be working as hard as possible from now until Saturday to put this right👊🏼💪🏼 twitter.com/cafcofficial/s…
    How many more weeks is this line going to be trotted out?

    In case you have not noticed Sam hard work will not cure the problems, most of the players are just not good enough.  
  • I think the majority of goals we are conceding fall into two category types. Winning balls from set pieces and untracked runs behind us. Stopping these should be priorities and probably require tactical change until we have key players fully fit. 
  • A team with no strikeforce is going to be far poorer than a balanced one. We can't ignore that obvious fact. I would criticise Jacko a bit in that I feel he should have accepted this and set up accordingly but in reality, we still would have struggled. Just maybe we would have gained a point or two more - who knows!

    I think a front two of Leko and Burstow is as weak as you are going to get. Burstow should be on the bench at most and Leko is not a central striker. Not in a million years. So you set up as if they are and you play as if they are and is it nonsense.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!