Kent CCC 2015
Comments
-
Stirling gone.
Goes for 90 from 50 balls.
b Stevens c Daniel Bell-Drummond
153-3 (13.4 overs)0 -
Morgan is out.
c Blake b Riley 54 (26)
170/4 from 15.2 overs.0 -
Burns has gone.
b Coles 13 (14)
192-5 (19 overs)0 -
Middlesex finish on 205-5.
Tough chase, however it could have been a lot worse as the four overs (16-19) only went for 23 runs, no boundaries.0 -
20-1
D B-D lbw 14 (12)0 -
Well the pinch-hitter Matt Coles comes in at 3, not Northeast as normal.
20/1 from 3 overs.1 -
Denly gone.
b Finn.
20/2 from 3.1 overs.0 -
21/2 from 40
-
Not looking good0
-
47/2 from 7 overs.0
-
Sponsored links:
-
51/2 from 8.
Nearly 13 an over needed now, 155 from 12 overs.0 -
Northeast gone for 20.
56/3 from 8.5 overs.
150 needed.0 -
And Coles goes next ball.
56/4 from 9.0 -
Billings and Stevens in, both haven't faced a ball.0
-
Billings dropping Morgan looks like it was pivotal.0
-
So, 64/4 after ten.
We need another 142 off the last ten ...0 -
Stevens gone for 3.
67/50 -
Blake gone.
78/60 -
84-8
Franklin's figures 5-210 -
84/8 now. That's that then ...0
-
Sponsored links:
-
114 run defeat is not too clever. Hopefully we can bounce back tomorrow0
-
I went tonight, in football terms it was like watching Charlton lose 7-0.0
-
Pathetic batting effort, yes Middlesex posted a decent batting total, and they've got some good bowlers (Finn and Franklin) but that was a very poor attempt.
When you see the top ODI and T20 batsmen manoeuvring the ball around, all out batsmen seemed to be able to do was hit the ball to long on/off for a single or loft the ball to long on/off and get caught...0 -
Of that Middlesex 11, 4 were born in the UK...0
-
not much of a cricket fan but just came up on Sky Sports that Kent are 135 for 3 from 2.2 overs in their T20 match with Surrey.
that's quite a good run rate isn't it?
0 -
155 - 3 after 14 overs0
-
Come on Super Kent!0
