Charlton v Bury - Post Match Views
Comments
-
We're shit.
We're in the shit.0 -
Recently it seems that the Belgians have lost patience with the manager/head coach sooner than the fans, this time it seems we would be fairly happy if they wielded the axe on his brass scouse neck. They still will cock up his replacement, and then his replacement, and the next etc etc.0
-
I have read these posts for years , first comment due to being a little lagging: The players seemed to put in a shift today but the quality is not there, no end product and no leader to organise the team. KR seems to be without a plan B.Why not scout the local leagues for players with hunger and desire?1
-
Didn't go to the game today despite handing out flyers.
We were given spare £5 seat tickets by fans happy to receive the flyers, we still did not go.
Most entertaining moment of the day for me was when one of the cars coming down into Floyd Road stopped, wound down window and asked for flyers. I'd love to be able to tell you which player it was but I can't mostly due to not being able to recognise them all.
I can absolutely confirm it wasn't Richard Murray who drove past in his jag with his RM24 plate.12 -
Thanks to everyone involved in producing those flyers, hope to see as many of those who read them as whose personal circumstances permit out there this weekend.1
-
ay.0
-
Players are poor , couple of good youngsters coming through they will be sold in time , Someone said why was Ricky Holmes captain my thoughts eacactly , runs around looks busy , but for me no discipline where is he playing ?
To be fair to Holmes he ain't the only one the discipline in the team is shocking, any team who comes to the valley and is well drilled and keeps their shape will take home the 3 points, every week I feel it's gonna change but sadly it's getting worse gutted.2 -
@hoof_it_up_to_benty wrote RD doesn't care if there are fans there or not.
With respect, I suggest that this is probably not the case. Very low attendances, week after week, will bite into the balance sheet and the situation may, in time, become unsustainable.
We are creatures of habit and often take comfort in the familiar. Attendees must decide whether the 'product' on offer is worthy of their support. Many have turned their backs on the club largely because it is so unfamiliar to that which they recognised in the past. It would seem to be the case that the number of those taking a personal (and collective) stand in saying 'No' is increasing.10 -
fair play to you handing out the leaflets ,respectAlwaysneil said:Thanks to everyone involved in producing those flyers, hope to see as many of those who read them as whose personal circumstances permit out there this weekend.
I'm pretty sure I saw you just before kick off on the corner near chip shop on floyd road.
I was the miserable grey haired fella with 4 young kids who said no thanks I'm already booked in for next week
I will try and find you next week and buy you and your son a drink of your choice!2 -
Because they support Charlton Athletic I suppose.PeterGage said:I have read 7 pages of comments on this thread, a high number of which are from supporterss attending the game and moaning like hell about the "experience".
I don't get, why go? A genuine question from somebody who did not renew his season ticket this season and has seen just two (protest) games at home and one away game (Oxford). So I ask again, why go, I don't get it? Thanks
ps I will be in Belgium next week.
We all have our walking away point and just because you've reached yours it doesn't mean others have reached theirs.10 -
Sponsored links:
-
The "walking away" point is a good phrase.
Mine has been coming on and off for a while. I do not spend any money in the ground.
Yesterday I got in the ground thought why bother. Watched a poor performance.
Hate RD and KM for what they have done. But , I have reached the walking away point. I hope I can come back when they have gone- if the club still exists.2 -
If Robinson blames himself for keeping mivididi on the pitch for too long why sign a player for the rest of the season that you know will have to be rested after 3 or 4 consecutive games in the first place?2
-
should have spent my £5 in either of theseJensenwasclass said:Robinson saying they are hitting the bar,
sums it up for me, where The Royal Oak, Rose of Denmark etc!
better spent0 -
in this league all these wanky formations with sub standard players will get you nowhere all you need is to play good old fashioned northern team hoofball to a good target man in the box 'ajose maybee'
we are simply not good enough to play passing football from the back
ffs just hoof our goal kicks and free kicks into the box
3 -
Under Slade we were all calling for 442
Under Karl we're still calling for 442
It doesn't matter now. The players are stuck in a horror show of Roland's making.
Next weekend's protest is all that matters.
Let's hope Roland finally decides to move on.
10 -
Did we play the 4-2-3-1 formation as before? Did Karl change it up at any point0
-
formation?? dont make me laugh no one knew where they were meant to be it was a shamblesBigRedEvil said:Did we play the 4-2-3-1 formation as before? Did Karl change it up at any point
2 -
Dwindling attendances are not an issue for him as long as he can flog a Lookman every two or three years. If a couple of thousand season ticket holders don't renew he loses, say, half a million pounds which in his masterplan is inconvenient but can be glossed over if the academy produces sellable youngsters.0
-
He'll need more Lookmans than that in League One, roughly one a season would be more like it. He's still the proverbial man in a hole with a shovel. And the actual Lookman is covering last season's loss.mogodon said:
Dwindling attendances are not an issue for him as long as he can flog a Lookman every two or three years. If a couple of thousand season ticket holders don't renew he loses, say, half a million pounds which in his masterplan is inconvenient but can be glossed over if the academy produces sellable youngsters.Anna_Kissed said:@hoof_it_up_to_benty wrote RD doesn't care if there are fans there or not.
10 -
Went to 4-4-2 when Magennis came on.BigRedEvil said:Did we play the 4-2-3-1 formation as before? Did Karl change it up at any point
0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Even Robinson seems confused about tactics now. But he at least admits nothing works with the team he has!
"We went from 4-3-3 with three strikers to 4-4-2 with two strikers. I heard a lot of people shouting “play this, play that.” We played every system under the sun to try and find the right one. We played 4-4-2 for the last 30 minutes today and we played with three attacking players at the beginning of the game. You’ve got to take your chances when they drop to you. Their keeper was man of the match.”0 -
I fully accept your response @se9addick. But as I tried to say, the level of moaning on here about the quality (of lack thereof) of the match day "experience" gets me to ask the question, "why still go and then bitch afterwards"se9addick said:
Because they support Charlton Athletic I suppose.PeterGage said:I have read 7 pages of comments on this thread, a high number of which are from supporterss attending the game and moaning like hell about the "experience".
I don't get, why go? A genuine question from somebody who did not renew his season ticket this season and has seen just two (protest) games at home and one away game (Oxford). So I ask again, why go, I don't get it? Thanks
ps I will be in Belgium next week.
We all have our walking away point and just because you've reached yours it doesn't mean others have reached theirs.
1 -
Isn't that the entire point of going to football ? It's the bit that Manchester United fans from Torquay will never get, moaning about the "match day experience" is the God given right of every man and woman who support their team for reasons other than glory.PeterGage said:
I fully accept your response @se9addick. But as I tried to say, the level of moaning on here about the quality (of lack thereof) of the match day "experience" gets me to ask the question, "why still go and then bitch afterwards"se9addick said:
Because they support Charlton Athletic I suppose.PeterGage said:I have read 7 pages of comments on this thread, a high number of which are from supporterss attending the game and moaning like hell about the "experience".
I don't get, why go? A genuine question from somebody who did not renew his season ticket this season and has seen just two (protest) games at home and one away game (Oxford). So I ask again, why go, I don't get it? Thanks
ps I will be in Belgium next week.
We all have our walking away point and just because you've reached yours it doesn't mean others have reached theirs.5 -
Match thread chaps, there's another thread running regarding walking away point, ta0
-
Bit like being married often have a moan and a "bitch" as you put it but some have a loyalty and longer staying power than others.PeterGage said:
I fully accept your response @se9addick. But as I tried to say, the level of moaning on here about the quality (of lack thereof) of the match day "experience" gets me to ask the question, "why still go and then bitch afterwards"se9addick said:
Because they support Charlton Athletic I suppose.PeterGage said:I have read 7 pages of comments on this thread, a high number of which are from supporterss attending the game and moaning like hell about the "experience".
I don't get, why go? A genuine question from somebody who did not renew his season ticket this season and has seen just two (protest) games at home and one away game (Oxford). So I ask again, why go, I don't get it? Thanks
ps I will be in Belgium next week.
We all have our walking away point and just because you've reached yours it doesn't mean others have reached theirs.
Having said that my threshold for CAFC is near to the end, some people just have a higher threshold for pain than others I guess.0 -
He doesnt need to - he's got his replacement already in the club - Congo Chris .mistrollingin said:
Pinocchio will be interviewing suitable new candidates as we speak.Tunwellsaddick said:Goodbye Karl
0 -
@ Mogadon said:mogodon said:
With respect, I suggest that this is probably not the case. Very low attendances, week after week, will bite into the balance sheet and the situation may, in time, become unsustainable.Anna_Kissed said:@hoof_it_up_to_benty wrote RD doesn't care if there are fans there or not.
Dwindling attendances are not an issue for him as long as he can flog a Lookman every two or three years. If a couple of thousand season ticket holders don't renew he loses, say, half a million pounds which in his masterplan is inconvenient but can be glossed over if the academy produces sellable youngsters.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, agree with Mogadon and it is certainly the case that Meire was at the very least indifferent to the loss of the c.4000 ST holders at the start of the season. At the Slade appointment press conference when she was presented with a golden opportunity to try to win some of them back (after heralding a new beginning under a British manager) she was asked during the PC about this loss of core support.
Anyone possessing even a shred of 'business' sense would have said something on the lines of "I hope they will have seen that we have listened, that they take note of what we are doing and will reconsider, and come back to The Valley preferably as ST Holders - we want them back."
Meire's actual reply was "It's their choice".
This fits with RDs (and therefore her) belief that the only good supporter is a totally compliant and uncomplaining customer attuned to the match day experience irrespective of anything else. If you are prepared to go to the post-match dance as well then good for you -Gold Star.
Anyone who doesn't fit the bill is collateral damage if they walk away.
The Club is being run as a two-fold experiment based upon a novel but flawed football approach and as a vehicle for social engineering.
In the case of the latter, if this means the creation of a new fan base ideally drawn from a different
demographic (e.g. RD and Meire's idea of attracting rugby-type supporters from areas of South-West London ready to mingle with opposing fans in an unsegregated crowd) then the loss of 4,000 (and presumably more than that now) core supporters from the traditional areas of support around the The Valley and into Kent....................is a price worth paying perhaps?
Indeed, to employ a phrase used by Meire about the history of the club which she might equally apply here to the loss of ST Holders..
"Je me'n fous" .........." I really don't care".
and in fact....is that very different from "It's their choice"?15 -
Sheff Utd you say.. There you have just highlighted the reality of the regime at this club.The Prince-e-Paul said:Went shopping with family in Sheffield town centre today. Heard the healthy United crowd roar all the way in the town centre a few times with big cheers. Have to say i'm a bit jealous. I'd love our stadium to be packed with fans roaring on the team to victory again and again. United aren't really a bigger club (lately) and can probably only attract similar quality of players and manager. The difference is that they seem to be well run and are littered with people that are Red and White to their core. Even when they were waiting to come good, their fans knew that their backers and board are all behind the club and more importantly hurting when it doesn't go well. If RD was on here telling us how much it upsets him to see us lose i'd have some belief but he doesn't give a fuck about the club, only the bottom line. Win, lose, or draw, if the club turns a profit, then that is all that matters at any cost. I feel sad that I am losing 'my only desire' and all because the one person that is responsible won't do the respectful thing and let the club be run by someone who will cherish it and nurture it back to health.
I didn't check our score until after full-time. This is not me. After nearly 40 years of following Charlton my heart is going cold. I've seen it all over this time as we all have, but i've never once felt this disconnect.
Sheff Utd manager, the bloke who saw through the Owner and CEO crap way of running a club. Who had the sense and principal not to take the managers job at our club.
I'm confident that had he not been sensible and taken the job here at CAFC this thread and all the others threads moaning about results would be no different.
Sheffield Utd have tried to help there manager as have Oxford and Bury all with differing budgets rather than restrict and hinder, basically they give the manager the best backing they can.
2 -
Posted on twitter straight after the game, the defending for the goal,would have got a bollocking at under 7 level, 3 wins in 18 games, fuck me with that squad, I would back myself with no qualifications to do better than that, again more changes and not a idea of who his best team is, rotten to the core6
-
Players are in general good quality for this league and there were good individual performances from aribo mavididi and that is about it for the positive. If robinson has got his players (less the elusive decent striker) then he at least has to get them playing together and for each other. The defence needs time together and someone needs to be shouting far more in defence as their goal was all our fault. Bauer or tex needs to be loudly commanding the defence and rudd needs to be positively talking loudly to that person. Robinson must see this as a priority. Aribo is similar to jordan cousins and must start each game. The passing was better yesterday minus any killer passes from midfield. The passing improved only because bury did not press us as much as oxford. It is back to basics for robinson and i am surprised that the effervescent karl picks the still water novak as a striker; he must think what on earth the club are doing with such a player. Lots to get on with karl so start earning your money. I believe we should keep robinson until the end of next season and changing things now would make things worse2
