Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

New 5 Year Kit Deal With Hummel (Away Kit Revealed, pg.19)

1…2223252728…43

Comments

  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,733
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:

    Rufus is a dogs name said:

    image

    The only thing i don't like about it is the slightly different shades on the front. Why is there a lighter rectangle area below the Betdaq logo?
    My guess is they put the Betdaq too low on these and had to remove and raise. They probably didn't have enough at the time not to do this. Just a theory.
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 57,833
    AFKABartram said:

    Do you still get a Valley Gold discount?

    Does anyone know this?
  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 15,818
    AFKABartram said:

    AFKABartram said:

    Do you still get a Valley Gold discount?

    Does anyone know this?
    yes I believe you do
  • East_Stand_Loopy
    East_Stand_Loopy Posts: 2,205
    AFKABartram said:

    Do you still get a Valley Gold discount?

    If anyone tells you, they'll get pelters for still being members of Valley Gold...
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,047
    AFKABartram said:

    AFKABartram said:

    Do you still get a Valley Gold discount?

    Does anyone know this?
    If you do it will mean your child's kit will only cost a bargain £60 rather than £67!
  • kings hill addick
    kings hill addick Posts: 5,781
    I'm impressed that they, also, voided that temptation to increase the prices. Most of the Premier League clubs are asking for c. £55 for a shirt this season. I note they all seem to change every season now as well, where as it used to be every other season.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,733
    edited July 2017
    Well, we are a League One club. If they could shift them for £70 they would charge £70.
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 57,833
    edited July 2017
    se9addick said:

    AFKABartram said:

    AFKABartram said:

    Do you still get a Valley Gold discount?

    Does anyone know this?
    If you do it will mean your child's kit will only cost a bargain £60 rather than £67!
    Good job I've got twins... :-(
  • uie2
    uie2 Posts: 4,596
    Callumcafc said:

    Shirts looking nice with the numbers printed on them.

    Hmm how are they gonna fit the names on the back in that tiny gap!?
  • buckshee
    buckshee Posts: 7,867
    AFKABartram said:

    se9addick said:

    AFKABartram said:

    AFKABartram said:

    Do you still get a Valley Gold discount?

    Does anyone know this?
    If you do it will mean your child's kit will only cost a bargain £60 rather than £67!
    Good job I've got twins... :-(
    I feel your pain brother

  • Sponsored links:



  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 15,818
    anyone going to the home kit launch tonight then?
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,439
    edited July 2017
    Elthamaddick said:

    anyone going to the home kit launch tonight then?

    image
  • NorthStandUltra
    NorthStandUltra Posts: 2,540
    Elthamaddick said:

    anyone going to the home kit launch tonight then?

    East Kent Addicks, SE7 Valiants & @Henry Irving only I'm afraid
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,457
    There was a competition on the website and facebook page to win an invite for tonight. The competition said winners would be draw by 5pm yesterday, but as of now there is no news on the website or facebook page about it. So I'm guessing I didn't win, but it would have been nice to know that they actually did a draw and who did win it.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,439
    randy andy said:

    There was a competition on the website and facebook page to win an invite for tonight. The competition said winners would be draw by 5pm yesterday, but as of now there is no news on the website or facebook page about it. So I'm guessing I didn't win, but it would have been nice to know that they actually did a draw and who did win it.

    NorthStandUltra just confirmed who the winners were... ;)
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,457
    ForeverAddickted said:

    randy andy said:

    There was a competition on the website and facebook page to win an invite for tonight. The competition said winners would be draw by 5pm yesterday, but as of now there is no news on the website or facebook page about it. So I'm guessing I didn't win, but it would have been nice to know that they actually did a draw and who did win it.

    NorthStandUltra just confirmed who the winners were... ;)
    Supposed to be 10 winners, more cut-backs from the club lol
    https://www.cafc.co.uk/news/view/596c741c8c4c2/win-the-chance-to-be-at-an-exclusive-preview-of-our-home-kit-for-the-201718-season
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,234
    Elthamaddick said:

    anyone going to the home kit launch tonight then?

    yep. I'm there
  • NorthStandUltra
    NorthStandUltra Posts: 2,540
    Henry Irving said:

    Elthamaddick said:

    anyone going to the home kit launch tonight then?

    yep. I'm there
    See, told ya
  • StigThundercock
    StigThundercock Posts: 3,722
    edited July 2017
    seth plum said:

    The protest shirt raised loads of money for charity and costs half the price of the official kit. It is sponsored by a true Charlton fan not a gambling company, was designed by fans and looks better than the official kit.
    Until he sells, whether we win every match or not next season, the protest kit is the one to wear, not the one shoved down the throat of innocent fans at a rip off price.
    I may be a lone voice but my feeling about the new kit is shove it, including any launches and announcements and such like.

    This, with bells on.

    I've always been a bit conflicted by blue Charlton kits, too many echoes of the noisy neighbours versus they often look pretty good. Apart from the socks, this new two-tone away kit looks fine and in almost any other circumstance I could see it being popular. Nobody of wit or conscience should endorse roly's toxic pantomime and buy this or any other merch. The only "Charlton" merch to be seen out in is Protest merch, until the carcinogenic crumbly is out of the picture. As soon as that preposterous pensioner has gone for good, we can all splurge bundles of cash on official Charlton goodies, but not before.
    Sad to see another misguided "businessman" has nailed his colours to roly's rotten mast by paying to splash his name across the players' shorts. That's one building firm that won't be looking forward to an upturn in trade locally.

  • Sponsored links:



  • cafcdave123
    cafcdave123 Posts: 11,491
    StigThundercock said:

    seth plum said:

    The protest shirt raised loads of money for charity and costs half the price of the official kit. It is sponsored by a true Charlton fan not a gambling company, was designed by fans and looks better than the official kit.
    Until he sells, whether we win every match or not next season, the protest kit is the one to wear, not the one shoved down the throat of innocent fans at a rip off price.
    I may be a lone voice but my feeling about the new kit is shove it, including any launches and announcements and such like.

    This, with bells on.

    I've always been a bit conflicted by blue Charlton kits, too many echoes of the noisy neighbours versus they often look pretty good. Apart from the socks, this new Hummel away kit looks fine and in almost any other circumstance I could see it being popular. Nobody of wit or conscience should endorse roly's toxic pantomime and buy this or any other merch. The only "Charlton" merch to be seen out in is Protest merch, until the carcinogenic crumbly is out of the picture. As soon as that preposterous pensioner has gone for good, we can all splurge bundles of cash on official Charlton goodies, but not before.
    Sad to see another misguided "businessman" has nailed his colours to roly's rotten mast by paying to splash his name across the players' shorts. That's one building firm that won't be looking forward to an upturn in trade locally.
    which building firm is it?
  • StigThundercock
    StigThundercock Posts: 3,722
    Named (shamed) on the OS. I'll not give it the oxygen of publicity here.
  • Rob7Lee
    Rob7Lee Posts: 9,596
    StigThundercock said:

    seth plum said:

    The protest shirt raised loads of money for charity and costs half the price of the official kit. It is sponsored by a true Charlton fan not a gambling company, was designed by fans and looks better than the official kit.
    Until he sells, whether we win every match or not next season, the protest kit is the one to wear, not the one shoved down the throat of innocent fans at a rip off price.
    I may be a lone voice but my feeling about the new kit is shove it, including any launches and announcements and such like.

    This, with bells on.

    I've always been a bit conflicted by blue Charlton kits, too many echoes of the noisy neighbours versus they often look pretty good. Apart from the socks, this new Hummel away kit looks fine and in almost any other circumstance I could see it being popular. Nobody of wit or conscience should endorse roly's toxic pantomime and buy this or any other merch. The only "Charlton" merch to be seen out in is Protest merch, until the carcinogenic crumbly is out of the picture. As soon as that preposterous pensioner has gone for good, we can all splurge bundles of cash on official Charlton goodies, but not before.
    Sad to see another misguided "businessman" has nailed his colours to roly's rotten mast by paying to splash his name across the players' shorts. That's one building firm that won't be looking forward to an upturn in trade locally.
    Kids still like the official shirts so suspect they'll sell as many as usual (no idea how many that is), no doubt my two will buy one :neutral: I've not bought a shirt for donkeys years so unlikely I'd buy whatever, I quite like blue for away, had many over the years.

    The building firm is an interesting one.........
  • cafcdave123
    cafcdave123 Posts: 11,491
    StigThundercock said:

    Named (shamed) on the OS. I'll not give it the oxygen of publicity here.

    fair enough, just had a look and they will also be on the front of the kids kits.

    are we the only club that have a sponsor on the kids kits when the official sponsor isnt allowed on their shirts ?

  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    The building firm are involved at the training ground in some capacity I believe.

    He's a businessman who is simply trying to get more exposure to his business. Just because you hate the owner doesn't make it right to wish failure upon a business who are trying to make money in very testing times in some areas of the construction industry
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    edited July 2017
    cafcdave123 said:

    StigThundercock said:

    Named (shamed) on the OS. I'll not give it the oxygen of publicity here.

    fair enough, just had a look and they will also be on the front of the kids kits.

    are we the only club that have a sponsor on the kids kits when the official sponsor isnt allowed on their shirts ?

    West Ham have "The Bobby Moore Foundation" on the front of their kids shirts.
  • cafcdave123
    cafcdave123 Posts: 11,491
    ricky_otto said:

    cafcdave123 said:

    StigThundercock said:

    Named (shamed) on the OS. I'll not give it the oxygen of publicity here.

    fair enough, just had a look and they will also be on the front of the kids kits.

    are we the only club that have a sponsor on the kids kits when the official sponsor isnt allowed on their shirts ?

    West Ham have "The Bobby Moore Foundation" on the front of their kids shirts.
    fair enough, still think it looks better without
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,862
    According to ConstructionFinance.com the industry is booming

    http://constructionfinance.com/2017/02/07/business-is-booming-for-the-construction-industry/
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,127
    Swisdom said:

    The building firm are involved at the training ground in some capacity I believe.

    He's a businessman who is simply trying to get more exposure to his business. Just because you hate the owner doesn't make it right to wish failure upon a business who are trying to make money in very testing times in some areas of the construction industry

    If they're giving money to fund Roland Duchaletet's deliberate destruction of Charlton Athletic they can't be surprised by any backlash. Do your research before entering a commercial partnership. I highly doubt it was his only option.
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,457
    You'll probably find that they're not funding Roland, at least not directly. Smells of a deal, discount on building costs in exchange for advertising.

Categories

“Marketplace”