Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Sport of Kings discussion thread
Comments
-
This has been verified previously as being truealan dugdale said:
Can’t believe that.Addick Addict said:
"He's"alan dugdale said:She’s probably hit the vegan sherry a tad too hard.0 -
alan dugdale said:
Can’t believe that.Addick Addict said:
"He's"alan dugdale said:She’s probably hit the vegan sherry a tad too hard.
Anarchist0 -
Genuine problem here is that every time AK raises his fair and justified points, we - myself included - go over to his thread and shout it down.
It then invariably gets sunk.
Same thing happens when AK comes over to "this demesne". And then someone's asking for him to be censored!
Much as I might disagree with him, this sort of bickering is crap all round. But it's impossible to deal with when the other thread is actively censored by the site's mods (which they have every right to do, as it's their board, but I find myself uncomfortable with).1 -
I think, as some have said, if we all just ignore him he will feel as he is talking to himself. And I'm sure if he decides to take it upon himself to bombard this thread unnecessarily with his views, the mods will then act.PaddyP17 said:Genuine problem here is that every time AK raises his fair and justified points, we - myself included - go over to his thread and shout it down.
It then invariably gets sunk.
Same thing happens when AK comes over to "this demesne". And then someone's asking for him to be censored!
Much as I might disagree with him, this sort of bickering is crap all round. But it's impossible to deal with when the other thread is actively censored by the site's mods (which they have every right to do, as it's their board, but I find myself uncomfortable with).2 -
AK asked to not post irrelevant points on his thread and stick to the subject of the thread so why can’t he practise what he preaches and wants and just stay of these threads.Will the mods act?1
-
But... where else can he post? Not that I'm saying it should be here - obviously I don't think it should be - but he's consistently had his threads sunk. And I'd actually be unhappy to see him banned, because censorship sits really uneasily with me.killer kish said:AK asked to not post irrelevant points on his thread and stick to the subject of the thread so why can’t he practise what he preaches and wants and just stay of these threads.Will the mods act?0 -
I wouldn’t want him banned but his threads are purely sunk because of no interest not through being banned0
-
As we're talking arseholes......
https://www.irishcentral.com/news/ryanair-michael-oleary-100-million-bonus
1 -
Ban her. Nothing but a wind up merchant.2
-
The thing with AK is he is againsy horse racing and stuff 1 of the reason being the deaths.
Yet it feels like in a sense he likes the deaths so he can come here and moan about another horse being killed.
Ok like is not the right word but you know what I mean, when a horse dies he has more ammo0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Him. Not exactly on grounds to call someone a WUM if you're being a WUM yourself.alan dugdale said:Ban her. Nothing but a wind up merchant.0 -
It’s not just the deaths of horses though is it. True colours were shown over the weekend when it insinuated that all horseracing fans brawled at meetings.
0 -
PeanutsMolloy said:As we're talking arseholes......
https://www.irishcentral.com/news/ryanair-michael-oleary-100-million-bonus
Peanuts, I can think (and I'm sure you can also) of many, many more adjectives than arsehole to describe that ******* ****.2 -
bobmunro said:
Agreed .....and I admire your attention to detail Bob. That's just the right number of asterisks.PeanutsMolloy said:As we're talking arseholes......
https://www.irishcentral.com/news/ryanair-michael-oleary-100-million-bonus
Peanuts, I can think (and I'm sure you can also) of many, many more adjectives than arsehole to describe that ******* ****.
4 -
Why don't we all just not respond to AK's posts.0
-
He could try not making anti sport posts on a sporting site.PaddyP17 said:
But... where else can he post? Not that I'm saying it should be here - obviously I don't think it should be - but he's consistently had his threads sunk. And I'd actually be unhappy to see him banned, because censorship sits really uneasily with me.killer kish said:AK asked to not post irrelevant points on his thread and stick to the subject of the thread so why can’t he practise what he preaches and wants and just stay of these threads.Will the mods act?
If you're anti sport you're on the wrong site.3 -
Her is a him.alan dugdale said:Ban her. Nothing but a wind up merchant.0 -
Just ignore him the best way - I find it all a bit off tbh look at recent comments the last 100 have been on rise of the vegans and various horse racing threads.
All about maturity and respect for other posters imo0 -
How do you know it’s a him ? I know it’s a play on “Anarchist” but how does that confirm it’s a male ?PaddyP17 said:
Him. Not exactly on grounds to call someone a WUM if you're being a WUM yourself.alan dugdale said:Ban her. Nothing but a wind up merchant.
0 -
It's a him. I've known him for 30 years.alan dugdale said:
How do you know it’s a him ? I know it’s a play on “Anarchist” but how does that confirm it’s a male ?PaddyP17 said:
Him. Not exactly on grounds to call someone a WUM if you're being a WUM yourself.alan dugdale said:Ban her. Nothing but a wind up merchant.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Fair enough, thanks.Covered End said:
It's a him. I've known him for 30 years.alan dugdale said:
How do you know it’s a him ? I know it’s a play on “Anarchist” but how does that confirm it’s a male ?PaddyP17 said:
Him. Not exactly on grounds to call someone a WUM if you're being a WUM yourself.alan dugdale said:Ban her. Nothing but a wind up merchant.
Naturally, I wouldn’t merely have taken the word of someone who promised Admin to stay off Racing threads and who posted a misleading petition in the past.0 -
No, threads are deliberately sunk. Otherwise, why do we see the likes of Paulie bring up threads from 2008?!killer kish said:I wouldn’t want him banned but his threads are purely sunk because of no interest not through being banned
I'd rather the thread stayed open so it stayed off here. Or is that too sensible?0 -
Also, 3.30 Wetherby - Mixboy looks to be a complete each-way burgle at 8/1. Baby King would represent much better value at 12s, but his form isn't consistent.
4.15 Taunton - Fidux looks value at 14/1 each way back on generally Good ground.0 -
Mixboy second good call Paddy
1 -
2 -
laurina running so lets see where she is heading ch or mh, Also hearing rumours that tiger rolls victory at the weekend may of come at a cost.0
-
Cilaos Emery's a big doubt for the Arkle. I am gutted at that. Gutted.0
-
Nice one. Nicked third.Showmetheway2gohome said:I Had mixboy and sturnrubin 22/1 2nd should of had em in ew double
fancy one today broadclyst 40/1 hood record never heard of it before probably been winning on Scarborough beach.
has fairly good PTP form só had a nibble at 50/1.
paid for my footie bet tonight.0 -
Love the sound of this.
Racing through the streets.
2 -
I bet he who we don't mention on this thread will be the first in the queue for tickets!Brendan_O_Connell said:Love the sound of this.
Racing through the streets.
3
