Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)
Comments
-
Hold on. So when you say you know something, what you really mean is you don't really know?PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Or have I read that wrong??4 -
Is that code for the European group still being in the hunt?PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.0 -
So basically, RD will not accept any price until he has sold all the saleable players and got back as much of his money he can1
-
Nope. And I don't know if they plan to return or not, but I hope to find out more about that next week.
Is that code for the European group still being in the hunt?PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.1 -
X0
-
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?3 -
But you’ve just said they haven’t pulled out? I’m confused.JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?3 -
1972, Charlton play in the 3rd division to the first in 37 years.0
-
1972 Mott the Hoople release All the young dudes.8
- Sponsored links:
-
James would the investors be required to keep pumping in funds once the deal is done or is it a case of pumping in enough funds to last x number of years all up front and then no more funds required?JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
I appreciate if you don't know or can't share but when you say over time they've lost several investors this is what worries me and probably plenty of others about a consortium taking over, is there a possibility that funds will regularly be needed? If so, others may decide to withhold funding causing a cashflow problem in the future?
0 -
1972 a terrible year for my parents as my sister was born.8
-
1972 Charlton sell Ray Treacy to Swindon Town ............................. I am still traumatised
2 -
Carrying him of the pitch following our win at sellhurst is a memory I still treasure.No.1 in South London said:1972 Charlton sell Ray Treacy to Swindon Town ............................. I am still traumatised11 -
Pleased don’t be confused.Solidgone said:
But you’ve just said they haven’t pulled out? I’m confused.JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
They haven’t pulled out.
Over time they have lost investors due to Roland messing them about (imho).2 -
Above my pay grade I’m afraid. I know they have a model that isn’t widely used in English football. No idea if it’s any good or not. Sounds ok in principal.MartinCAFC said:
James would the investors be required to keep pumping in funds once the deal is done or is it a case of pumping in enough funds to last x number of years all up front and then no more funds required?JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
I appreciate if you don't know or can't share but when you say over time they've lost several investors this is what worries me and probably plenty of others about a consortium taking over, is there a possibility that funds will regularly be needed? If so, others may decide to withhold funding causing a cashflow problem in the future?
Initial sums provided by initial investors, but a broader based investor structure built up going forward. Something like that? I think they like the membership model that some European clubs use.
Sorry for waffling.4 -
1972 - AUN entered the world. Found it all to be a bit of a struggle.4
-
Aussies still buying us.JamesSeed said:
Pleased don’t be confused.Solidgone said:
But you’ve just said they haven’t pulled out? I’m confused.JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
They haven’t pulled out.
Over time they have lost investors due to Roland messing them about (imho).0 -
All I knew about the Aussies up until recently is what you've written on here. The only extra thing I know now is that Charlton say that they have not seen or heard anything from them since they lost one of their consortium.JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
So I just think its a bit odd, what you have been told now. What could it mean? I suppose de Turck could be on holiday but Murray is there for sure, because who else is handling the transfers? There is no CEO. I suppose Murray in turn might say, I can't talk before deadline day but I cannot believe they cannot set up a meeting with either him or de Turck for beginning of next week.0 -
Does seem odd but RD is odd and who knows what set up he’s got, what would Chris Parkes role as club secretary be?PragueAddick said:
All I knew about the Aussies up until recently is what you've written on here. The only extra thing I know now is that Charlton say that they have not seen or heard anything from them since they lost one of their consortium.JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
So I just think its a bit odd, what you have been told now. What could it mean? I suppose de Turck could be on holiday but Murray is there for sure, because who else is handling the transfers? There is no CEO. I suppose Murray in turn might say, I can't talk before deadline day but I cannot believe they cannot set up a meeting with either him or de Turck for beginning of next week.0 - Sponsored links:
-
When did "Charlton" say that Prague Addick?
Gallen is doing the football deals.1 -
Will this thread make it to 2019? It's struggling.1
-
At Roland's' ridiculous asking price? I doubt it.Valley27000 said:
Aussies still buying us.JamesSeed said:
Pleased don’t be confused.Solidgone said:
But you’ve just said they haven’t pulled out? I’m confused.JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
They haven’t pulled out.
Over time they have lost investors due to Roland messing them about (imho).2 -
Lieven is the one they talk to, not Murray.PragueAddick said:
All I knew about the Aussies up until recently is what you've written on here. The only extra thing I know now is that Charlton say that they have not seen or heard anything from them since they lost one of their consortium.JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
So I just think its a bit odd, what you have been told now. What could it mean? I suppose de Turck could be on holiday but Murray is there for sure, because who else is handling the transfers? There is no CEO. I suppose Murray in turn might say, I can't talk before deadline day but I cannot believe they cannot set up a meeting with either him or de Turck for beginning of next week.2 -
I’ve just about given up hope. But you never know.addick05 said:
At Roland's' ridiculous asking price? I doubt it.Valley27000 said:
Aussies still buying us.JamesSeed said:
Pleased don’t be confused.Solidgone said:
But you’ve just said they haven’t pulled out? I’m confused.JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
They haven’t pulled out.
Over time they have lost investors due to Roland messing them about (imho).0 -
I don't know exactly. It is what "the Europeans" have learnt. So fairly recent.Henry Irving said:When did "Charlton" say that Prague Addick?
Gallen is doing the football deals.0 -
Ok so even if he is on holiday, I'd have thought that by text at least he'd arrange any requested meeting for when he gets back.That's kind of normal access expected of high level managers.JamesSeed said:
Lieven is the one they talk to, not Murray.PragueAddick said:
All I knew about the Aussies up until recently is what you've written on here. The only extra thing I know now is that Charlton say that they have not seen or heard anything from them since they lost one of their consortium.JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
So I just think its a bit odd, what you have been told now. What could it mean? I suppose de Turck could be on holiday but Murray is there for sure, because who else is handling the transfers? There is no CEO. I suppose Murray in turn might say, I can't talk before deadline day but I cannot believe they cannot set up a meeting with either him or de Turck for beginning of next week.3 -
Normal? You should realise by now that nothing at Charlton is normal anymore.PragueAddick said:
Ok so even if he is on holiday, I'd have thought that by text at least he'd arrange any requested meeting for when he gets back.That's kind of normal access expected of high level managers.JamesSeed said:
Lieven is the one they talk to, not Murray.PragueAddick said:
All I knew about the Aussies up until recently is what you've written on here. The only extra thing I know now is that Charlton say that they have not seen or heard anything from them since they lost one of their consortium.JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
So I just think its a bit odd, what you have been told now. What could it mean? I suppose de Turck could be on holiday but Murray is there for sure, because who else is handling the transfers? There is no CEO. I suppose Murray in turn might say, I can't talk before deadline day but I cannot believe they cannot set up a meeting with either him or de Turck for beginning of next week.
also, from the Peterborough Chairman’s comments yesterday it looks like Gallen negotiating deals.2 -
"Normal"PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Ok so even if he is on holiday, I'd have thought that by text at least he'd arrange any requested meeting for when he gets back.That's kind of normal access expected of high level managers.JamesSeed said:
Lieven is the one they talk to, not Murray.PragueAddick said:
All I knew about the Aussies up until recently is what you've written on here. The only extra thing I know now is that Charlton say that they have not seen or heard anything from them since they lost one of their consortium.JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
So I just think its a bit odd, what you have been told now. What could it mean? I suppose de Turck could be on holiday but Murray is there for sure, because who else is handling the transfers? There is no CEO. I suppose Murray in turn might say, I can't talk before deadline day but I cannot believe they cannot set up a meeting with either him or de Turck for beginning of next week.
Ok so even if he is on holiday, I'd have thought that by text at least he'd arrange any requested meeting for when he gets back.That's kind of normal access expected of high level managers.JamesSeed said:
Lieven is the one they talk to, not Murray.PragueAddick said:
All I knew about the Aussies up until recently is what you've written on here. The only extra thing I know now is that Charlton say that they have not seen or heard anything from them since they lost one of their consortium.JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
So I just think its a bit odd, what you have been told now. What could it mean? I suppose de Turck could be on holiday but Murray is there for sure, because who else is handling the transfers? There is no CEO. I suppose Murray in turn might say, I can't talk before deadline day but I cannot believe they cannot set up a meeting with either him or de Turck for beginning of next week.
How can you use that word in relation to this regime or sales process.0 -
Well, yeah, fair point. Although I believe de Turck once had a "normal" kind of job as a CFO and I bet he had to keep his phone on during holidays then. Oh, well.Henry Irving said:
"Normal"PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Ok so even if he is on holiday, I'd have thought that by text at least he'd arrange any requested meeting for when he gets back.That's kind of normal access expected of high level managers.JamesSeed said:
Lieven is the one they talk to, not Murray.PragueAddick said:
All I knew about the Aussies up until recently is what you've written on here. The only extra thing I know now is that Charlton say that they have not seen or heard anything from them since they lost one of their consortium.JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
So I just think its a bit odd, what you have been told now. What could it mean? I suppose de Turck could be on holiday but Murray is there for sure, because who else is handling the transfers? There is no CEO. I suppose Murray in turn might say, I can't talk before deadline day but I cannot believe they cannot set up a meeting with either him or de Turck for beginning of next week.
Ok so even if he is on holiday, I'd have thought that by text at least he'd arrange any requested meeting for when he gets back.That's kind of normal access expected of high level managers.JamesSeed said:
Lieven is the one they talk to, not Murray.PragueAddick said:
All I knew about the Aussies up until recently is what you've written on here. The only extra thing I know now is that Charlton say that they have not seen or heard anything from them since they lost one of their consortium.JamesSeed said:
If they’d gone, why would they tell me they haven’t? That doesn’t add up.PragueAddick said:PragueAddick said:
Hi James. Who told you that, and why, I wonder? I know that it is untrue.JamesSeed said:GM and Aussies still in the hunt, but there’s no one around to deal with them at the moment, apparently. Chaos.
The word fed back from the club about the Aussies is that they lost one of their investors and have not been heard of since. But that too could be disinformation, or a part truth.
Over time they’ve lost several investors - each time Roland moved the goalposts. Can you blame them for pulling out, when they get effed about by Roland?
So I just think its a bit odd, what you have been told now. What could it mean? I suppose de Turck could be on holiday but Murray is there for sure, because who else is handling the transfers? There is no CEO. I suppose Murray in turn might say, I can't talk before deadline day but I cannot believe they cannot set up a meeting with either him or de Turck for beginning of next week.
How can you use that word in relation to this regime or sales process.
BTW I get that Gallen is our recruitment ace but do you believe he has to handle the outward shit too? Like when Boro moved for Dijksteel, he had to field their call and then ask RD what he wants to do?
Dwell on how shit that is for him, if that is indeed how this is set up.
1
This discussion has been closed.
