Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)

1197019711973197519762264

Comments

  • JamesSeed said:
    Posted this on transfers thread:

    I just hope Roland isn’t thinking of hanging around now the running costs have been lowered. Perhaps he thinks we might go on a run so he can put the price up again? Perhaps he’s even dreaming of the Premier League 😩
    I think he’s worked out we’ve brought in enough money to at least break even, hence Bowyer getting some of the Dijksteel money to spend on the squad.

    While waiting for a ridiculous offer for the club he can wait and see how the team get on. He said something around our budget doesn’t mean we have no chance in one of his statements. If Bowyer pulled off a miracle and we went up again he’ll probably get his money back.
  • edited August 2019
    The only reason we did not sell Taylor when the offer of £4.5M came in is that Roland was getting his teeth whitened at the time and missed the call.
    I heard he was in Clarks getting a new pair of shoes. It took a while, it's a big investment. 
  • Scoham said:
    I think he’s worked out we’ve brought in enough money to at least break even, hence Bowyer getting some of the Dijksteel money to spend on the squad.

    While waiting for a ridiculous offer for the club he can wait and see how the team get on. He said something around our budget doesn’t mean we have no chance in one of his statements. If Bowyer pulled off a miracle and we went up again he’ll probably get his money back.
    If it’s true we had the lowest budget in the division, promotion would seem unattainable. 

    I wonder if budget has increased? 
  • stonemuse said:
    If it’s true we had the lowest budget in the division, promotion would seem unattainable. 

    I wonder if budget has increased? 
    Increased but still easily the lowest is my guess.
  • Or having lost all the buyers due to his silly price and silly games he realised he was going to still own the club this season.

    He then had the choice of allowing it to go down with a whimper, which would have decreased its value, made him look bad and ramped up protests, or allow Bowyer to at least have a fighting chance of staying up.

    For all the credit rightly given to Bowyer and Gallen they haven't spent very much and nothing at all compared to many other championship clubs.
    I cant disagree with what you say, but, I also agree with some of the other comments made above, that something has changed with Roland. If a £4 million bid was made by the club for Tovey, then that is way out of line with the way Roland has conducted himself, either that bid was made with assuming they would let Lyle go, or there,s something going on behind the scenes.
  • edited August 2019
    I mentioned this elsewhere, but the Aussies told me something about Roland that made me think he wouldn’t dare sell Taylor. At least not without a proper replacement in place. I suspect that had the offer been accepted for Toney, Taylor would’ve been off. But he wouldn’t have sold him and pocketed the money.
    Edit: Not because of scruples, but because of reputational damage and the increase of protests it would have caused. 
  • JamesSeed said:
    I mentioned this elsewhere, but the Aussies told me something about Roland that made me think he wouldn’t dare sell Taylor. At least not without a proper replacement in place. I suspect that had the offer been accepted for Toney, Taylor would’ve been off. But he wouldn’t have sold him and pocketed the money. 

    What did they tell you?
  • Sponsored links:


  • Yay I now exist the world can rejoice.

  • What did they tell you?
    See edit above. 
  • RD may at last have been persuaded of the obvious - that a club in the Championship with decent squad and a chance of going up has more value than one which is likely to go down. 
  • JamesSeed said:
    I mentioned this elsewhere, but the Aussies told me something about Roland that made me think he wouldn’t dare sell Taylor. At least not without a proper replacement in place. I suspect that had the offer been accepted for Toney, Taylor would’ve been off. But he wouldn’t have sold him and pocketed the money.
    Edit: Not because of scruples, but because of reputational damage and the increase of protests it would have caused. 
    Something like this was also picked up in "Central Europe" but it would be important to understand this a bit better. Important not just for us on here but for potential buyers. 
  • Brentford played out exactly as had been predicted to me and if the Toney deal had gone through I am certain Taylor would have been allowed to leave. They were willing to pay him three times his Charlton salary and they were confident of getting him. The question is where his head will be now.
    So, on your understanding, RD was willing to pay out 4m (?) for Toney? Seems completely out of character. 
  • Brentford played out exactly as had been predicted to me - with the late cash upfront offer repeating the Konsa tactic - and if the Toney deal had gone through I am certain Taylor would have been allowed to leave. They were willing to pay him three times his Charlton salary and they were confident of getting him. The question is where his head will be now.
    Praying for a takeover I expect. 
  • I suggested this scenario earlier today.

    Something doesn't add up, does it ....
    I think we are all secretly hoping this, but don't want to say it
  • Sponsored links:


  • The suggestion then is that RD understands the need for stability and or to retain Bows to get a sale.. Personally feel Bows might have found it difficult to bite his lip and maintain the respect of the fans if Taylor had been flogged with no repair or benefit to the squad.
  • Re my earlier post, there is also Cawley's resonant tweet yesterday (my emphasis) " Duchatelet knows this will open the portals of hell" Cawley is a proper pro who played a blinder for us yesterday, again. if he was just reading "us" in the tweet he would not have included the first two words, I believe. A year or more ago Duchatelet would not have given a toss. So I wonder what RC has heard that allowed him to write that.
    It totally backs up what GM told me. RD is far more sensitive to protests and reputational damage than we realise. This was after conversations they had with him at the time of the playoff win. 
  • JamesSeed said:
    It totally backs up what GM told me. RD is far more sensitive to protests and reputational damage than we realise. This was after conversations they had with him at the time of the playoff win. 
    James, with regards to his sensitivity to both protests and reputational damage, would it be fair to assume he's much more concerned about the latter than the former? 
  • I've inboxed AFKA to tell him that the bullying of Surrey supporters on here has gone too far.
    He has promised me that several Kent and one Worcester supporter will receive lifetime bans unless they collectively come on here and appolagise unreservedly. 
    There's another Worcester supporter on here?

    Who?
  • iainment said:
    There's another Worcester supporter on here?

    Who?
    Leuth
  • @KiwiValley was here...screaming and kicking. It would be a quarter century before I succumbed to my Addicks fan fate.
  • Whether it was Roderick Duchatelet or another family member who explained the scenario to Roland but the Belgium 20 could become the 200 and the thought of Cafc fans on every corner of his estate may has got to him and the business implications of selling your top asset without a replacement.

    Paying a similar fee for Toney with which Taylor would have gone for was pragmatic and no way has the 72 year become Santa Claus.


This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!