Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
I am surprised that the combatants could not attend in person and still stay COVID distanced.After all, returning to work is perfectly safe 😉0
-
She isn’t going to send the link to the new Teams call out, is she?1
-
Any idea on what is going on?
0 -
22 -
.0
-
Stig said:SheedyCAFC said:Best that none of us join and just follow the updates, we don’t want this adjourned2
-
Yeah fans can be blamed.0
-
For the sake of getting this done if you're not actually scheduled to contribute
Get out of the fucking way and let those with a part to play get on with it
Your interest is genuine of course but the longer this goes on the longer that parasitic arsehole Elliottttt and all his fellow fuckers have their toxic claws in CAFC
You know it makes sense27 -
Covered End said:Nadou said:Great if idiot fans f**k this up
The fans were invited and joined as per invite.
We are now 34 minutes in and proceedings haven't started yet. This is probably not normal and is likely to be attributable to the unusually high number of interested members of the public.
On that basis ... people should really get out and give the legal experts a chance to deliver what we are all hoping for.10 - Sponsored links:
-
Get off if you love Charlton6
-
Nadou said:jacob_CAFC said:How can this be put at the door of the fans? Absolutely absurd to suggest that.
Yes the people that don't mute and turn off their mic and camera are idiots but that's not why a new link was sent out....2 -
This won't be concluded today - already 38 minutes down1
-
AndyG said:Stig said:SheedyCAFC said:Best that none of us join and just follow the updates, we don’t want this adjourned0
-
Yeah, it is the fans fault for caring about their club......
If the issue is bandwidth, just limit space like you would in a real court of law.3 -
Reckon they should use whatever system Babestation uses. They can then do their stuff while everyone else watches11
-
Ridiculous to blame fans. Obviously people are going to want to watch it unfold and it worked fine last time with around the same number of people in the call.
I guess now we just have to wait until 4 and see what has happened.1 -
Is Tomas there?0
- Sponsored links:
-
meldrew66 said:Why does PE have to get in? He has no actual role in this process - surely he is just and interested party, like us?0
-
StigThundercock said:For the sake of getting this done if you're not actually scheduled to contribute
Get out of the fucking way and let those with a part to play get on with it
Your interest is genuine of course but the longer this goes on the longer that parasitic arsehole Elliottttt and all his fellow fuckers have their toxic claws in CAFC
You know it makes senseFerryman said:Get off if you love CharltonDave Rudd said:Covered End said:Nadou said:Great if idiot fans f**k this up
The fans were invited and joined as per invite.
We are now 34 minutes in and proceedings haven't started yet. This is probably not normal and is likely to be attributable to the unusually high number of interested members of the public.
On that basis ... people should really get out and give the legal experts a chance to deliver what we are all hoping for.
0 -
What time's the drinks break?0
-
There's a limited amount of slots on Teams, say 200 people can join and theres 600 trying to log in, it creates a queuing system, people that need to be there will get caught in the queue - causing delays- you then have to take into consideration the courts ability to host, connection speeds, bandwith, server... sure Teams and the courts hardware can host 200 people - but not necessarily successfully.
I've sat in a team training meeting on Teams, 42 people, one person sharing a screen so we can watch.. it was shite.
And I imagine the email request and invite from the court is automated, I doubt a secretary sat there and counted through 200+ emails.
4 -
J BLOCK said:This won't be concluded today - already 38 minutes down1
-
I don't blame anyone, but as Lee says It is what it is.
I agree it is farcical.
Please leave the call and let Rich and Rick report on Twitter.2 -
0
-
roseandcrown said:AndyG said:Stig said:SheedyCAFC said:Best that none of us join and just follow the updates, we don’t want this adjourned3
-
Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:Nadou said:Great if idiot fans f**k this up
The fans were invited and joined as per invite.
We are now 34 minutes in and proceedings haven't started yet. This is probably not normal and is likely to be attributable to the unusually high number of interested members of the public.
On that basis ... people should really get out and give the legal experts a chance to deliver what we are all hoping for.5 -
We, the invited fans, have done nothing wrong. Mics and cameras on were inevitable but had not part to play in the delay. It's bizarre that they didn't let the key players in first. Almost unbelievable really as this was always going to happen.
4
This discussion has been closed.