Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Bold to assume PE will sell to TS. Wouldn’t surprise me if he was waiting to pass it on to another set of crooks
36 -
My fear preciselyElliotCAFC said:Bold to assume PE will to TS. Wouldn’t surprise me if he was waiting to pass it on to another set of crooks3 -
Is Chaisty Colin Robinson in disguise?
5 -
But you would only get the injunction if the 1st 2 were a serious possibility.Jints said:
That's not what this hearing is about (at least I don't think it is). Breach of contract is normally remedied by damages. ESI 2 have to show that is not an adequate remedy should they be right about the contract and that an injunction is therefore necessary.Cafc43v3r said:
But that could be settle with damages at a later point.Jints said:
Disagree. ESI 1 can argue that delay diminishes the asset because of the imminent start of the season and potentially removes the chance of a sale. Therefore an interim injunction should not be awarded.Cafc43v3r said:
It's legally nothing to do with football ffs.mattinfinland said:Can LK use the football club, fans ... the season on a whole as part of a defence?
EG its not just between Elliot and Nimer, the whole club is at stake?
My point was it doesn't matter legally, if its a football club, a house or a sweet shop. It's either been sold, has a contract of exclusiveity or it hasn't.0 -
Let’s hope LK didn’t get injured in the warm up.0
-
It's more complicated than that. This is for an injunction. If Elliot wins this the court case won't happen until NovemberCallumcafc said:
Depends. If Nimer is asking for 500k and Elliott is asking for 5m it makes a difference.cafcfan1990 said:Makes no difference to TS I'm sure. He either pays Elliott or pays Nimer.0 -
I don’t this boring bloke is ever going to stop talking to allow herCallumcafc said:
Hope you're right.golfaddick said:
if he is doing that then he knows he hasn't got anything of substance to go on.Callumcafc said:How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
Anxious to hear LK's argument now.0 -
I'm pretty sure you are right plus whether damages would be adequate remedy if wonership is in doubtse9addick said:
I don’t think that’s true - I think the judge needs to decide whether there is sufficient evidence that the ownership is in doubt to grant an injunction pending a full trial to examine this properly.meldrew66 said:There is one single, simple decision for the judge: Is there (yes or no) a legally binding agreement for ESI to buy the club from Panorama Magic?Could be wrong.0 -
Is LK sitting on a throne?0
-
My god this fella goes on and on repeating the same stuff and contradicting himself1
- Sponsored links:
-
Clear provision of false or misleading information to the EFL is reason for disqualification on August 7th. Chaisty argues that right to appeal to arbitration panel is clear, but says Mihail misunderstands rules. Throws doubt on his other points re EFL.
0 -
No change there thenChizz said:"The referee's assistant has indicated there will be a minimum of 60 minutes additional time".0 -
EFL board found that Elliott had been owner since June 8th.
Yet even Sandgaard said that the EFL had told him that it was Nimer who was the owner?0 -
Can’t the judge tell him to wind it up?roseandcrown said:
I don’t this boring bloke is ever going to stop talking to allow herCallumcafc said:
Hope you're right.golfaddick said:
if he is doing that then he knows he hasn't got anything of substance to go on.Callumcafc said:How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
Anxious to hear LK's argument now.1 -
TS actually has money, that's the differenceElliotCAFC said:Bold to assume PE will sell to TS. Wouldn’t surprise me if he was waiting to pass it on to another set of crooks
A quick profit and a nice clean exit.0 -
EFL are cowards. They have been waiting for this hearing I assume when they needed to get those appeals heard quickly to inform the hearing.5
-
Think he as fallen a kipozaddick said:
Can’t the judge tell him to wind it up?roseandcrown said:
I don’t this boring bloke is ever going to stop talking to allow herCallumcafc said:
Hope you're right.golfaddick said:
if he is doing that then he knows he hasn't got anything of substance to go on.Callumcafc said:How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
Anxious to hear LK's argument now.7 -
Note to self
When a lawyer says they will get through these last bits very quickly that is by no means true8 -
yesozaddick said:
Can’t the judge tell him to wind it up?roseandcrown said:
I don’t this boring bloke is ever going to stop talking to allow herCallumcafc said:
Hope you're right.golfaddick said:
if he is doing that then he knows he hasn't got anything of substance to go on.Callumcafc said:How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
Anxious to hear LK's argument now.1 -
That can't be true. Since that date the EFL have told TS that ESI1 are the owners, and Farnell has stood up in front of this very judge and said that Elliott isn't the owner.ForeverAddickted said:EFL board found that Elliott had been owner since June 8th.7 - Sponsored links:
-
Trying to keep up on this thread, Cawley's twitter and keeping an eye on Kent score, nothing going to well but always hope1
-
Has probably buggered off!!roseandcrown said:
Think he as fallen a kipozaddick said:
Can’t the judge tell him to wind it up?roseandcrown said:
I don’t this boring bloke is ever going to stop talking to allow herCallumcafc said:
Hope you're right.golfaddick said:
if he is doing that then he knows he hasn't got anything of substance to go on.Callumcafc said:How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
Anxious to hear LK's argument now.2 -
Lauren pulled a face boring bloke casting doubt on mm as Romanian lawyer0
-
Well, according to Farnell there is (was) but it was on condition that PE passed the EFL tests. And he should know as he was acting for PE at the time.meldrew66 said:There is one single, simple decision for the judge: Is there (yes or no) a legally binding agreement for ESI to buy the club from Panorama Magic?
Case closed.0 -
Neither would you if you were getting paid £5,000 an hour!carly burn said:Note to self
When a lawyer says they will get through these last bits very quickly that is by no means true2 -
an argument that's he foreign so wrong, is a bit of a reach (he might be wrong, but even so)0
-
Glad I didn't bother signing in again. Me bottle of Fischer been drunk already0
-
1 hour, 20 minutes into a 2 hour case and the defence hasn't spoken yet...…………..that's gotta be close to a record?!
5 -
No but you could mate and l'd button it straight away 😉ozaddick said:
Can’t the judge tell him to wind it up?roseandcrown said:
I don’t this boring bloke is ever going to stop talking to allow herCallumcafc said:
Hope you're right.golfaddick said:
if he is doing that then he knows he hasn't got anything of substance to go on.Callumcafc said:How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
Anxious to hear LK's argument now.
1 -
randy andy said:
That can't be true. Since that date the EFL have told TS that ESI1 are the owners, and Farnell has stood up in front of this very judge and said that Elliott isn't the owner.ForeverAddickted said:EFL board found that Elliott had been owner since June 8th.
I dare say LK might bring that point up. Same judge, after all - he wont take kindly to having been lied to
3
This discussion has been closed.
