Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Clearly a tactic to get this adjourned as there won't be enough time for the defense to argue its case.............Dippenhall said:He's done 10 frigging summaries, move over.2 -
This will be adjourned to another day when he finishes.1
-
Well if he got a brief fee why is he taking so long.Jints said:
He won't be getting paid by the hour. Will be a fixed fee (known as a brief fee).se9addick said:
Neither would you if you were getting paid £5,000 an hour!carly burn said:Note to self
When a lawyer says they will get through these last bits very quickly that is by no means true3 -
We’ve bottled it0
-
QCs get paid by the word.Jints said:
He won't be getting paid by the hour. Will be a fixed fee (known as a brief fee).se9addick said:
Neither would you if you were getting paid £5,000 an hour!carly burn said:Note to self
When a lawyer says they will get through these last bits very quickly that is by no means true0 -
I hope this twat doesn't start butting in when our girl starts4
-
Yes press on0
-
I'm going with the logic that for all his waffling must mean he ain't got a lot in his armoury and he's playing for time. Just need a couple of bobby dazzlers from our LK3
-
From 20 mins ago, just for the record-Chaisty: There is no evidence that this injunction will cause the club harm or deny it any benefitsChaisty: Elliott has made the point that Nimer has "washed his hands of the club"0 -
Phew... Judge wants to press on!!
Neither Judge or Chaisty can do tomorrow morning, no time pressure2 - Sponsored links:
-
QC arguing that damages are no good because Panorama is a shell company based in Abu Dhabi and have no assets to pay any damages.Cafc43v3r said:
But that could be settle with damages at a later point.Jints said:
Disagree. ESI 1 can argue that delay diminishes the asset because of the imminent start of the season and potentially removes the chance of a sale. Therefore an interim injunction should not be awarded.Cafc43v3r said:
It's legally nothing to do with football ffs.mattinfinland said:Can LK use the football club, fans ... the season on a whole as part of a defence?
EG its not just between Elliot and Nimer, the whole club is at stake?
My point was it doesn't matter legally, if its a football club, a house or a sweet shop. It's either been sold, has a contract of exclusiveity or it hasn't.0 -
Chaisty has finished. Lauren Kreamer has asked whether she may be cut off tonight. She proposes to take about an hour. "My learned friend has had 90 minutes and will doubtless want a right of reply." Judge and Chaisty can't make tomorrow morning...
0 -
That’s also a good description of Farnell.smiffyboy said:My god this fella goes on and on repeating the same stuff and contradicting himself1 -
This could work in our favour. It gives Lk time to dissect their statements.No.1 in South London said:
Clearly a tactic to get this adjourned as there won't be enough time for the defense to argue its case.............Dippenhall said:He's done 10 frigging summaries, move over.0 -
Half time & now "we" get a chance.
Judge says will try & continue & finish tonight.12 -
Only If it continues tomorrow.0
-
Decision might not be today, the hearing will be heard0
-
They will when TS gives them 6 large.Covered End said:
QC arguing that damages are no good because Panorama is a shell company based in Abu Dhabi and have no assets to pay any damages.Cafc43v3r said:
But that could be settle with damages at a later point.Jints said:
Disagree. ESI 1 can argue that delay diminishes the asset because of the imminent start of the season and potentially removes the chance of a sale. Therefore an interim injunction should not be awarded.Cafc43v3r said:
It's legally nothing to do with football ffs.mattinfinland said:Can LK use the football club, fans ... the season on a whole as part of a defence?
EG its not just between Elliot and Nimer, the whole club is at stake?
My point was it doesn't matter legally, if its a football club, a house or a sweet shop. It's either been sold, has a contract of exclusiveity or it hasn't.2 -
Go on Laura...0
-
"Scant, brief and incoherent"LK's description of Chaisty's use of his own client's evidence2
- Sponsored links:
-
Kreamer for Panorama says that Chaisty hasn’t referred to his own client’s evidence, which she says is scant and incoherent.
9 -
Hahahhaa, she's mugging the bloke off already
16 -
I can't see how any of the arguments would be a surprise. Maybe to us, but not to LK.1
-
BRIEF?????IdleHans said:"Scant, brief and incoherent"LK's description of Chaisty's use of his own client's evidence7 -
LOL SHES ALREADY MUGGING HIM OFF3
-
All good in Blighty mate you too 👍.ozaddick said:
I think you mean ‘wind it in’ mate! 😂RedChaser said:
No but you could mate and l'd button it straight away 😉ozaddick said:
Can’t the judge tell him to wind it up?roseandcrown said:
I don’t this boring bloke is ever going to stop talking to allow herCallumcafc said:
Hope you're right.golfaddick said:
if he is doing that then he knows he hasn't got anything of substance to go on.Callumcafc said:How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
Anxious to hear LK's argument now.
hope you and yours are doing well red. 😊1 -
Has that gobshite QC shut up yet?0
-
LK already reminding the Judge of the Southall case...10
-
Not Chaisty ... Elliott’s ‘evidence’ForeverAddickted said:
BRIEF?????IdleHans said:"Scant, brief and incoherent"LK's description of Chaisty's use of his own client's evidence3 -
Yes. And Laura's started well.bigstemarra said:Has that gobshite QC shut up yet?3
This discussion has been closed.
