Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…4041434546…175

Comments

  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,302
    For me its simple... Has anything changed from the Southall case when the judge said that PE didnt own the club?

    If Yes then what is that... If No then the injuncture can so fuck itself
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    DRAddick said:
    roseandcrown said:
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    May be a silly question, but is LK a Charlton supporter?
    Yes 


    Farnell has complained that this is a conflict of interest.
    Desperation, hopefully

  • meldrew66
    meldrew66 Posts: 2,561
    ForeverAddickted said:
    For me its simple... Has anything changed from the Southall case when the judge said that PE didnt own the club?

    If Yes then what is that... If No then the injuncture can so fuck itself
    Yes, I think you have hit the nail on the head. The fact that it is the same judge involved here, I would imagine that is a pretty strong arguement
  • roseandcrown
    roseandcrown Posts: 7,587
    boring fucker looks uncomfortable 
  • ozaddick
    ozaddick Posts: 2,844
    ricky_otto said:
    Todds_right_hook said:
    ricky_otto said:
    If Lauren pulls this off, Mrs Otto better get used to me calling her Name out when we are having our monthly bunk up. The good news is Mrs Otto is called Lauren as well - so I can’t go wrong.
    What if she calls out chaisty’s name?
    I’ll kick her in the ****
    That made me piss!! 🤣
  • CheshireAddick
    CheshireAddick Posts: 1,305
    Does Chaisty look it's squeaky bum time 🤣
  • 1905
    1905 Posts: 2,751
    I need to get to PC World for a replacement F5 key and beat the rush.
  • Paddy Powell
    Paddy Powell Posts: 2,842
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Panorama argues that while the July court case had different parties, the same “cast of characters” is involved. Court held then that shares were still owned by Panorama. Judge was same.
    I asked about that on page 40. That's the answer we needed. 
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    edited September 2020
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Kreamer argues that parties agreed on July 13th that a sale from Panorama had not completed and court accepted that. Nothing has changed since then.
    35 yeard screamer from Kreamer
  • Sponsored links:



  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,302
    roseandcrown said:
    boring fucker looks uncomfortable 
    He's getting frustrated he hasnt spoken for so long in all his life!!
  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,257
    Kreamer: The court already determined who owned the shared on July 13 (Panorama). Nothing has changed since then. Adds the applicant now is trying to circumvent that decision with this injunction.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    Helpful it is the same judge I suppose.
  • CL_Phantom
    CL_Phantom Posts: 5,513
    ForeverAddickted said:
    For me its simple... Has anything changed from the Southall case when the judge said that PE didnt own the club?

    If Yes then what is that... If No then the injuncture can so fuck itself

    Said this on the main thread, one thing has happened since then - Elliott officially FAILED the OADT 
  • ProperCharlton
    ProperCharlton Posts: 2,254
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Kreamer argues that parties agreed on July 13th that a sale from Panorama had not completed and court accepted that. Nothing has changed since then.
    Maybe I underestimated our new best friend. Keep it going!
  • meldrew66
    meldrew66 Posts: 2,561
    someone get the girl some more water
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,302
    Kreamer making the case that on two occasions in July the court - and the same judge - made clear that the ownership of the club was still under the control of Panorama Magic. Also says that court has no details on why the EFL turned down Elliott under the OADT.

    May SPA has not been carried into effect, says Kreamer. EFL view not binding on the court, just it’s opinion, and no evidence provided for it.
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 50,974
    MuttleyCAFC said:
    Helpful it is the same judge I suppose.
    Yes
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,302
    Nice of the EFL to not provide the court with such important information!!!
  • Sponsored links:



  • Weegie Addick
    Weegie Addick Posts: 16,521
    meldrew66 said:
    someone get the girl some more water
    Love that it is a Hoegaarden Belgian beer glass. Do you think Lauren picked it up on the protests?
  • CAFCsayer
    CAFCsayer Posts: 10,223
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    DRAddick said:
    roseandcrown said:
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    May be a silly question, but is LK a Charlton supporter?
    Yes 


    Farnell has complained that this is a conflict of interest.
    Desperation, hopefully


    LK, in being on the board of CAST, has the best interests of Charlton Athletic Football Club at heart. In saying that this would be a conflict of interests suggests that Farnell does not... why is he seeking an injunction to the sale of CAFC if he does not have it's best interests at heart?
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,330
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Nice of the EFL to not provide the court with such important information!!!
    Exactly.
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,347
    roseandcrown said:
    boring fucker looks uncomfortable 
    It looks like he's trying to be as distracting as possible to me
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,167
    ForeverAddickted said:
    If this is the Play-Off Final it feels like Purrington has equalised!!
    Purry B is the man for September on the official calendar. It's a sign!
  • Redvalleyeast
    Redvalleyeast Posts: 4,689
    1905 said:
    I need to get to PC World for a replacement F5 key and beat the rush.
    I need a replacement keyboard,mines a bit,ahem,damp......
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    Elliott hasn't even paid his pound for the Club
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    edited September 2020
    I thought the conflict of interest statement was a joke. I mean her interest is the club not being rinsed by crooks.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”