Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

14445474950175

Comments

  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,229
    Will the grim reapers stop giving your opinions during Lauren's deliberations.
    Can we have the inquest after, not during.

    Go Lauren.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,331
    Jayajosh said:
    Chizz said:
    The fact that the pound was never "paid" is not relevant.  The pound represents a consideration.  Not paying the pound doesn't void the contract, it merely opens up a separate action in debt.  In other words, Elliot not paying the pound simply means he owes a pound. 

    Further: DICHAND v HYDRAREDOX TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS LIMITED

    What if there's a contractual condition that it has to be paid within say 14 days?
    Then one party owes the other party a pound (or a dollar, or a euro, or whatever...) and can be sued for it. 
  • J BLOCK
    J BLOCK Posts: 8,309
    My money is on this going to a full trial 
  • talking about bury go on 
  • Kreamer making case that it would "doubtless be possible" for a court to come up with compensation for Lex Dominus in the future. She says there would be huge damage caused to the club if an injunction is obtained.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    I think it is going to trial but if the EFL appeal fails before then, maybe it will be settled. LK has done ok but MM and EFL have stuffed us up I think.  
  • Kreamer refers to the fate of Bury, making the point that damages awarded subsequently could not put loss right if #cafc expelled from the EFL, whereas Lex faces only a potential commercial loss.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,763
    Thomas is one cool dude
  • Sponsored links:



  • Kreamer about to sum up I think, so we're going to get some kind of decision very soon.
  • Interesting that this FCA ad should pop up in my twitter feed just now
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    Chaisty pointing at his watch in a dramatic manner.
  • Rob7Lee
    Rob7Lee Posts: 9,594
    All pray the judge is a Football Fan......
  • Same thing as above but in different words-

    Kreamer pointing out that all the language used by Farnell in rep of Panorama against Southall on July 13th referred to Panorama's ownership as current. Also points out Farnell claimed Lex Dominus were "seeking" to buy the club.
  • Addickted said:
    Chaisty pointing at his watch in a dramatic manner.
    Should have gotten on with it then... Its not like he has to commute home!!
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 50,974
    Kreamer about to sum up I think, so we're going to get some kind of decision very soon.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,034
    I think the injunction will be granted so that it can go to full trial. 
  • Richard J
    Richard J Posts: 8,032
    I have said earlier that the mismatch of experience of the Barristers was nothing to worry about. 

    I was encouraged when I saw LK was a Trust Board member because it meant that she would have a grasp of the detail that her opponent wouldn't. The facts are the facts.

    The one negative is MM seems to have dropped a few clangers, but if the £1 hasn't been paid then surely its a shut case. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • CAFCsayer
    CAFCsayer Posts: 10,223
    Judge mutes his Mic to ask his wife if he can continue
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,961
    Judge just asked the clerk of the court to put the kettle on
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 50,974
    Kreamer basically saying there is "a very material risk" the club's ceases to exist due to these wranglings over ownership.
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Addickted said:
    Chaisty pointing at his watch in a dramatic manner.
    When you hate someone and don't even know what they look like, that's Chaisty
  • Should we be concerned that now Farnell has sold Lex Dominus, that all evidence against him today will just be dismissed by judge?
  • Chaisty repeatedly mentioned that Mihail didn't disclose info on potential new buyers. Kreamer points out that Mihail can't release commercially sensitive info.
  • WSS
    WSS Posts: 25,070
    I suppose the thing here is we can’t see any of the documents/evidence that have been submitted
  • ct_addick
    ct_addick Posts: 4,333
    Chaisty goes on the list....someone grab a file
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,763
    edited September 2020
    Addickted said:
    Chaisty pointing at his watch in a dramatic manner.
    When you hate someone and don't even know what they look like, that's Chaisty
    So you have an image to direct your anger towards... :-)


  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Should we be concerned that now Farnell has sold Lex Dominus, that all evidence against him today will just be dismissed by judge?
    Surely the link is there and it must mean something?
This discussion has been closed.