Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Will the grim reapers stop giving your opinions during Lauren's deliberations.
Can we have the inquest after, not during.
Go Lauren.5 -
Jayajosh said:Chizz said:The fact that the pound was never "paid" is not relevant. The pound represents a consideration. Not paying the pound doesn't void the contract, it merely opens up a separate action in debt. In other words, Elliot not paying the pound simply means he owes a pound.
Further: DICHAND v HYDRAREDOX TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS LIMITED
What if there's a contractual condition that it has to be paid within say 14 days?0 -
My money is on this going to a full trial0
-
talking about bury go on0
-
Chizz said:The fact that the pound was never "paid" is not relevant. The pound represents a consideration. Not paying the pound doesn't void the contract, it merely opens up a separate action in debt. In other words, Elliot not paying the pound simply means he owes a pound.
Further: DICHAND v HYDRAREDOX TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS LIMITED32 -
-
Kreamer making case that it would "doubtless be possible" for a court to come up with compensation for Lex Dominus in the future. She says there would be huge damage caused to the club if an injunction is obtained.7
-
I think it is going to trial but if the EFL appeal fails before then, maybe it will be settled. LK has done ok but MM and EFL have stuffed us up I think.1
-
Kreamer refers to the fate of Bury, making the point that damages awarded subsequently could not put loss right if #cafc expelled from the EFL, whereas Lex faces only a potential commercial loss.
9 -
Thomas is one cool dude2
- Sponsored links:
-
Kreamer about to sum up I think, so we're going to get some kind of decision very soon.
0 -
Interesting that this FCA ad should pop up in my twitter feed just now5
-
ForeverAddickted said:18
-
Chaisty pointing at his watch in a dramatic manner.6
-
All pray the judge is a Football Fan......0
-
Same thing as above but in different words-Kreamer pointing out that all the language used by Farnell in rep of Panorama against Southall on July 13th referred to Panorama's ownership as current. Also points out Farnell claimed Lex Dominus were "seeking" to buy the club.4
-
Addickted said:Chaisty pointing at his watch in a dramatic manner.3
-
Kreamer about to sum up I think, so we're going to get some kind of decision very soon.0
-
I think the injunction will be granted so that it can go to full trial.0
-
I have said earlier that the mismatch of experience of the Barristers was nothing to worry about.
I was encouraged when I saw LK was a Trust Board member because it meant that she would have a grasp of the detail that her opponent wouldn't. The facts are the facts.
The one negative is MM seems to have dropped a few clangers, but if the £1 hasn't been paid then surely its a shut case.3 - Sponsored links:
-
Judge mutes his Mic to ask his wife if he can continue
19 -
Judge just asked the clerk of the court to put the kettle on
11 -
Kreamer basically saying there is "a very material risk" the club's ceases to exist due to these wranglings over ownership.5
-
Addickted said:Chaisty pointing at his watch in a dramatic manner.14
-
Should we be concerned that now Farnell has sold Lex Dominus, that all evidence against him today will just be dismissed by judge?0
-
Chaisty repeatedly mentioned that Mihail didn't disclose info on potential new buyers. Kreamer points out that Mihail can't release commercially sensitive info.9
-
I suppose the thing here is we can’t see any of the documents/evidence that have been submitted0
-
Chaisty goes on the list....someone grab a file2
-
i_b_b_o_r_g said:Addickted said:Chaisty pointing at his watch in a dramatic manner.
6 -
stoneroses19 said:Should we be concerned that now Farnell has sold Lex Dominus, that all evidence against him today will just be dismissed by judge?1
This discussion has been closed.