Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…4647495152…175

Comments

  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,313


    Chaisty spent a lot of time talking about the levels of risk Mihail mentions. Kreamer argues that any risk to #cafc is enough. "Football clubs can cease to exist as a result..." #cafc #SaveCAFC
    1
    2

    Kreamer: I don't think there is any evidence in the submitted bundle on Elliott's appeal.P
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,336
    Redrobo said:
    We need the wisdom of Solomon. Give them £0.50p
    Cancel that, he never paid. 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 95,028
    MuttleyCAFC said:
    It may be telling that ESI2 have not explained why they expect to win the EFL appeal. Surely if it was on a technicality that was easy to remedy, they would refer directly to what that was.
    No its frustrating the EFL have stayed quiet as its helped them to avoid that issue
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,422
    Lauren has nailed point after point. Chaisty was just waffling and picking out bits of Mihail's language by comparison.
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 11,001
    MuttleyCAFC said:
    It may be telling that ESI2 have not explained why they expect to win the EFL appeal. Surely if it was on a technicality that was easy to remedy, they would refer directly to what that was.

    Wasnt that the explanation that farnell gave originally? Utter bulls**t
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 11,001
    Now demolishing chaisty's nonsense about weeks.
  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,313
    Kreamer: If the court grants this injunction, the sale to a third party could not be complete. #cafc #SaveCAFC
    1
    2

    Kreamer: The importance of this club to its fans and to its community should not be underestimated. And I invite the court not to do so
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,032
    Chunes said:
    Lauren has nailed point after point. Chaisty was just waffling and picking out bits of Mihail's language by comparison.
    Chaisty was also wasting time, as if he wanted the case to overrun and be postponed for another day...
  • stoneroses19
    stoneroses19 Posts: 7,275
    MuttleyCAFC said:
    It may be telling that ESI2 have not explained why they expect to win the EFL appeal. Surely if it was on a technicality that was easy to remedy, they would refer directly to what that was. The EFL have had loads of time to have heard this. They are a disgrace to the game.
    Obviously EFL have never shared the technicality reason with fans as it's an existing appeal, but surely they would have needed to supply the reason to the court today. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • Weegie Addick
    Weegie Addick Posts: 16,568
    Judge wants a trial :-(
  • RodneyCharltonTrotta
    RodneyCharltonTrotta Posts: 14,838
    addick1956 said:
    Croydon said:
    Stolen from Twitter:

    Sounds like the court hearing has started with a Naby Sarr pass back to Dills.
    You mean the error that Phillips held his hand up to ?

    It was his foot he held up.
  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 12,016
    edited September 2020
    Oh ffs (in response to @Weegie Addick)
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,240
    Into the last 5minutes.
    Where's BFG when you need him.
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Weegie Addick said:
    Judge wants a trial :-(
    For real?
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,782
    I agree. But it seems there is missing evidence that could have swung it and the EFL can be blamed for that. That and MM not identifying the risk. We need to tell him to F off after this.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 95,028
    Judge has bottled it then? 
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Surely Farnelliott will bottle a full on trial and are playing for a bigger settlement?
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 95,028
    How can he decide one thing one case and then come to another conclusion at another when nothing has changed? 
  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,313
    Kreamer: No matter how quickly matters progress, I invite the court to be realistic. There is nothing to suggest the timeline would be short enough to avoid risk to #cafc. #SaveCAFC
    1
    11

    Kreamer: Chaisty refers to weeks, but then mentions November, which is months..."

  • Sponsored links:



  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,088
    se9addick said:
    I think the injunction will be granted so that it can go to full trial. 
    Definitely looking this way. 

    Elliott’s lawyer has been able to create enough doubt around the ownership to (in the judges mind) justify a trial. 

    Don’t think we’ve been able to show any imminent harm to the club/ESI should the injunction be granted and a full trial initiated. 
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,507
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    Weegie Addick said:
    Judge wants a trial :-(
    For real?
     Think so.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 95,028
    Judge reckons there is no immient takeover so doesn't matter about season starting soon

    Yeah because this is all to let TS know who he should be dealing with surely
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,782
    edited September 2020
    We need to pressure the EFL to stop farting about. If they fail the appeal that might prevent it going to trial. Can't see us winning this though. 
  • stoneroses19
    stoneroses19 Posts: 7,275
    ForeverAddickted said:
    How can he decide one thing one case and then come to another conclusion at another when nothing has changed? 
    I'm very confused how he can take that view.  
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,886
    Judge is saying trial in November isn't unreasonable......
  • mrbligh
    mrbligh Posts: 3,056
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Judge has bottled it then? 
    don't think so. just our main 'witness' as it were is a clown/chancer/lovely guy and should be kept on in some capacity 

    He has been shown up for what he is today.......'great' on social media but not so much when it matters 
  • ProperCharlton
    ProperCharlton Posts: 2,254
    I can see this going to trial. Disaster for the club.
  • Addicktion
    Addicktion Posts: 384
    Why doesn't the judge know about TS sale? It might not be imminent but its far along to be of significance?
  • Fumbluff
    Fumbluff Posts: 10,160
    Callumcafc said:
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    Addickted said:
    Chaisty pointing at his watch in a dramatic manner.
    When you hate someone and don't even know what they look like, that's Chaisty
    So you have an image to direct your anger towards... :-)


    He’s just missing his weak lemon drink
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”