Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…5051535556…175

Comments

  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,330
    Leeds_Addick said:
    Redrobo said:
    Come on all those who got in, keep us updated FFS.
    Boring fart is back on arguing the judge has to grant an injunction otherwise the trial for damages in November is pointless
    Thanks. Can someone let the Judge know I will hold a £1 so that each party will be able to get their money.
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 6,365
    Chaisty must be a Rugby fan.
  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 11,983
    There is evidence of a sale though, isn’t there?
  • Er_Be_Ab_Pl_Wo_Wo_Ch
    Er_Be_Ab_Pl_Wo_Wo_Ch Posts: 1,785
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    Er_Be_Ab_Pl_Wo_Wo_Ch said:
    Someone just called judge/Chaisty an utter see you next Tuesday.

    Was Chaisty the judge an all then? That's gotta be another conflict of interest
    Ha! I couldn't tell where the insult was directed tbh.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,034
    ME14addick said:
    If the injunction is granted, could TS pay off Elliott so he withdraws the injunction?
    I guess he could, but would you? If it meant paying ESI v1 and v2 then he’s paying one party for something they don’t own. If it was my money then I would wait until the trial sorts out who actually owns the club to avoid any madness later on.  
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    HAs there been a decision or not?

    I thought it had finished ad was going to trial?
  • Rossman92
    Rossman92 Posts: 3,650
    edited September 2020
    ME14addick said:
    If the injunction is granted, could TS pay off Elliott so he withdraws the injunction?
    Think that's the only hope if PE gets the injunction 
  • siblers
    siblers Posts: 2,018
    ME14addick said:
    If the injunction is granted, could TS pay off Elliott so he withdraws the injunction?
    That is probably Elliott's and Farnell's master plan, looks like it may work
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,965
    Whoever is chipping in, you are not helping
  • CheshireAddick
    CheshireAddick Posts: 1,305
    Oh dear

  • Sponsored links:



  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,318
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    HAs there been a decision or not?

    I thought it had finished ad was going to trial?
    Nah judge hasnt decided yet

    Sounds very likely that a trial will be the outcome
  • Er_Be_Ab_Pl_Wo_Wo_Ch
    Er_Be_Ab_Pl_Wo_Wo_Ch Posts: 1,785
    Wow! Farnell has just been called a see you next Tuesday.
  • jacob_CAFC
    jacob_CAFC Posts: 2,063
    edited September 2020
    Someone just interruptted to call Farnell a cnut - fucking idiot
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,459
    Interjection there!
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    Jesus.

    Some people just can't help themselves.
  • Addicktion
    Addicktion Posts: 384
    can't be doing that in a court...
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 50,974
    Chaisty says if that gets to a stage where they (Panorama Magic} can show "compelling evidence" then "we might have that further argument".
  • sammy391
    sammy391 Posts: 3,782
    Some idiot unmuting his mic to tell the judge that ‘it’s because Chris Farnell is a C**t”
  • RodneyCharltonTrotta
    RodneyCharltonTrotta Posts: 14,827
    Valley11 said:
    There is evidence of a sale though, isn’t there?

    Hopefully more than merely a Danish American bloke expressing interest on twitter .
  • Atletico Addick
    Atletico Addick Posts: 5,843
    Their lawyer banging on about evidence and lack of yet I've not heard an iota from himself, all hearsay and spiel. All a huge shame this. Kreamer very respectable but we've been cornered by corruptness. Super upsetting and the ripple effect will be huge sadly.
  • Sponsored links:



  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    Who is going to pay the wages?
  • Rylo
    Rylo Posts: 860
    This is utterly painful.
  • RodneyCharltonTrotta
    RodneyCharltonTrotta Posts: 14,827
    peterreeves said:
    J BLOCK said:
    Mihal has fucked us 
    Have to agree that it's looking that way... Think he better slink off somewhere as pelters may be coming his way if it goes Pete tong! 

    I'm a bit lost here, what did MM do that's caused this reaction?
  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,260
    edited September 2020
    peterreeves said:
    J BLOCK said:
    Mihal has fucked us 
    Have to agree that it's looking that way... Think he better slink off somewhere as pelters may be coming his way if it goes Pete tong! 

    Would you rather rewrite the evidence or dislodge him and Kreamer so we have a new legal team if there's a trial to come?
  • Horsfield9
    Horsfield9 Posts: 3,082
    Better get another bunch of Roses and round up the Interflora Boys !
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,330
    Will the offer to pay Elliott his money back plus fifty grand get mentioned and turn the tide?
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Is LK getting another crack aswell?
  • roseandcrown
    roseandcrown Posts: 7,587
    what is the point of him carrying on talking. He is saying the same things in different ways 
  • Dippenhall
    Dippenhall Posts: 3,919
    Even the opposition saying we played a crap game.
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,977
    ross1 said:
    Chaisty says if there is no evidence of any imminent sale, "where is the risk in a temporary injunction?"
    Why is there no ‘evidence’ of an imminent sale? The potential owner is literally going to our games ffs and the EFL have been dealing with his lawyers.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”