Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…959698100101…175

Comments

  • Talal
    Talal Posts: 11,484
    Bedsaddick said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Judge believes he has the power to make an injunction pending an intervention by the court of appeal.
    I have absolutely no idea what that means .
    I think it means he can grant a short injunction until the court of appeal decide whether Lex Dominus have grounds for appeal. Not certain though. 
  • meldrew66
    meldrew66 Posts: 2,561
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Kreamer raising the fact that Chaisty's point of law (in which he is seeking a short-term injunction) relates to a Family Court - she is saying it is in relation to a change of situation to children.

    Oooh (in the voice of Mickey Flanagan) well done Lauren!
  • SporadicAddick
    SporadicAddick Posts: 6,846
    carly burn said:
    This could be playing into TS hands even more so now.

    ESI need to get out quick before this gets anywhere near a trial.
    So unless the Turks are nearly there id say they are dead in the water. They probably don't even exist
    They do - went to Bodrum last year,  - there's millions of 'em.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,301
    In terms of Football League World, I've got to say there are plenty of other quality sites covering South London football that are available.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,301
    Chaisty is seeking the injunction that he sought yesterday by the back door, says Kreamer. Refused injunctions and appeals common but Chaisty has produced no relevant precedent.
  • paulbaconsarnie
    paulbaconsarnie Posts: 9,423
    Garrymanilow said:
    Well, this is marginally more stressful than I thought today would be

  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,763
    edited September 2020
    .
  • Gary Poole
    Gary Poole Posts: 1,874
    Think LK should counter propose proceeds of sale to be kept on account pending decision on appeal being granted, got to be better than a delay to sale
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,301
    Kreamer arguing against interim injunctions. "I note made orally - with no notice to me or anyone instructing my client." Said they must have known they were looking to launch an appeal.
  • ProperCharlton
    ProperCharlton Posts: 2,254
    Come on Lauren!
  • Sponsored links:



  • PeanutsMolloy
    PeanutsMolloy Posts: 6,705
    edited September 2020
    Henry Irving said:
    PeanutsMolloy said:
    roseandcrown said:
    i would love it if Kreamer sticks on a Charlton top to end it. 
    There is absolutely ZERO conflict of interest in LK representing Panorama and being a recent, former board member of CAST and current and passionate Addick.
    CAFC is not a party to the proceedings and to the extent that she has an emotional interest in the asset in dispute, that is completely immaterial to the claim and the defence.
    There are however MULTIPLE conflicts of interest for Mr Farnell who lodged this complaint and has represented both parties to these proceedings - bloody rich for PE's QC to kvetch about it.
    Kvetch.  Not a word we hear enough of @PeanutsMolloy   One for @SE7toSG3

    Along with pyrrhic and draconian from their QC.
    Straight from the courtroom of Judge Judy 

    Injunction?


  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,301
    Kreamer knows nothing about Football League World. Says that Mihail's comments on the official website were exactly the same that the judge had in front of him yesterday. That MM said talks were progressively positively. "There is nothing new there."
  • Addickhead86
    Addickhead86 Posts: 1,148
    It feels like Elliott(tt)'s hanging off the cliff and we're just prying away the fingers one by one. Hope we get it done and fully Wile. E. Coyote the mf.
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,347
    edited September 2020
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty is seeking the injunction that he sought yesterday by the back door, says Kreamer. Refused injunctions and appeals common but Chaisty has produced no relevant precedent.
    Go on, Lauren!

    Chaisty just slings mud.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,842
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Kreamer knows nothing about Football League World. Says that Mihail's comments on the official website were exactly the same that the judge had in front of him yesterday. That MM said talks were progressively positively. "There is nothing new there."
    MM redeems himself with his cautious website updates!
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,301
    Kreamer says it Chaisty will be attempting to "obtain relief by the back door and is not to be encouraged".
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,301
    Chaisty now quoting the Sandgaard piece on our website. (SLP)
  • mendonca
    mendonca Posts: 9,405
    Cawley's updates are very good today!
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,842
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Kreamer says it Chaisty will be attempting to "obtain relief by the back door and is not to be encouraged".
    Sounds painful  :o
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,301
    Kreamer saying Chaisty is quoting an individual "not involved in these proceedings".

    Chaisty now quoting @SandgaardThomas from the SLP. Kreamer objects that Chaisty now giving evidence himself.
  • Sponsored links:



  • robinofottershaw
    robinofottershaw Posts: 1,921
    Getting a bit feisty now!
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,330
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Kreamer says it Chaisty will be attempting to "obtain relief by the back door and is not to be encouraged".
    Post Kenneth Williams here -
  • Atletico Addick
    Atletico Addick Posts: 5,843
    Enjoying this one today.. Chaisty getting a shade more ragey. Not his finest showing. :blush:
  • mendonca
    mendonca Posts: 9,405
    He's providing his own evidence ffs!
  • ButtleJR
    ButtleJR Posts: 1,586
    Oh dear, come on Lauren.
  • NorthheathAddick
    NorthheathAddick Posts: 4,017
    ForeverAddickted said:
    NorthheathAddick said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty now quoting the Sandgaard piece on our website. (SLP)
    Shut up you scummy cunt
    Sorry :(
    😂🤣😘
  • Atletico Addick
    Atletico Addick Posts: 5,843
    If Chaisty's voice goes up one more octave I don't think anyone bar dogs in the same room as us will be able to hear him.
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,167
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Kreamer says it Chaisty will be attempting to "obtain relief by the back door and is not to be encouraged".
    That settles it, she definitely posts in here. It'll be a fish pun next
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,301
    Chaisty complaining that Kreamer should know what her client is doing in terms of negotiations with @SandgaardThomas - says she is representing Panorama not @CAStrust.
  • WSS
    WSS Posts: 25,070
    @AFKABartram's finger hovering over the 'Post Comment' button with "I told ya" in the comments box.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”