Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Sounds to me like someone is getting really desperate0
-
If the judge reads the articles it also says the sale of the club is important because it saves us from the cretins fighting over ownership! Being a community club that should be important to him!
2 -
This is crap surely, what next?
Chasity: “As you can see judge Pearce, there’s lots of tweets saying imminent”5 -
Chaisty's digging a hole, judge not going to like this.0
-
He's sounding like an excited Steve Claridge1
-
ForeverAddickted said:Kreamer says it Chaisty will be attempting to "obtain relief by the back door and is not to be encouraged".
15 -
Chaisty's getting aggy.
0 -
Judge responds with "when it's on the OS".BR7_addick said:This is crap surely, what next?
Chasity: “As you can see judge Pearce, there’s lots of tweets saying imminent”35 -
Judge Clarke says it would be "unusual" for a court to grant an injunction for a short time when it hadn't granted it for a longer time. He says it doesn't mean the court has "no power" to grant an interim injunction while a party at least tries to go to Court of Appeal.
4 -
Come on, m'lud, do not cave into this twat1
- Sponsored links:
-
Judge ruling on injunction pending application to appeal. Says unusual having decided not to grant injunction for longer period. Judge believes appeal will not be successful.
3 -
It is high time these thick bastards realised that the game is up.0
-
Come on. We're so close.0
-
Has Pearce gone to the bog?ForeverAddickted said:Judge Clarke says it would be "unusual" for a court to grant an injunction for a short time when it hadn't granted it for a longer time. He says it doesn't mean the court has "no power" to grant an interim injunction while a party at least tries to go to Court of Appeal.4 -
Hahaha... Not only has the whole ESI saga been acted out over Twitter, they've now got their lawyer trying to quote twitter in a court of law. Gold.BR7_addick said:This is crap surely, what next?
Chasity: “As you can see judge Pearce, there’s lots of tweets saying imminent”1 -
Chaisty not the first to be caught out by the 'Its happening' gif that's been posted on here a gazillion times over the years.0
-
Who is judge Clarke?!?!ForeverAddickted said:Judge Clarke says it would be "unusual" for a court to grant an injunction for a short time when it hadn't granted it for a longer time. He says it doesn't mean the court has "no power" to grant an interim injunction while a party at least tries to go to Court of Appeal.1 -
where has he popped up from?ForeverAddickted said:Judge Clarke says it would be "unusual" for a court to grant an injunction for a short time when it hadn't granted it for a longer time. He says it doesn't mean the court has "no power" to grant an interim injunction while a party at least tries to go to Court of Appeal.0 -
Is there another Judge there too seeing that Judge Clarke has just been mentioned, or has Cawley done a typo?0
-
There's lots of posts saying that we were gonna smash Millwall, but we know the actual result every time!BR7_addick said:This is crap surely, what next?
Chasity: “As you can see judge Pearce, there’s lots of tweets saying imminent”3 - Sponsored links:
-
Everyone keep fingers crossed.1
-
oh-oh, that kinda opens the door for Judge Pearce to grant the interim injunction then?ForeverAddickted said:Judge Clarke says it would be "unusual" for a court to grant an injunction for a short time when it hadn't granted it for a longer time. He says it doesn't mean the court has "no power" to grant an interim injunction while a party at least tries to go to Court of Appeal.
0 -
Ex brentford RB I thinkCafc43v3r said:
Who is judge Clarke?!?!ForeverAddickted said:Judge Clarke says it would be "unusual" for a court to grant an injunction for a short time when it hadn't granted it for a longer time. He says it doesn't mean the court has "no power" to grant an interim injunction while a party at least tries to go to Court of Appeal.9 -
Hold on but Chaisty sayin yesterday no sale imminent but flips that today. Judge ruled yesterday that CAFC an asset to the community and in peril. Surely needs to kick this out and chastise Chaisty3
-
I think the judge is holding out for a promote from cabbles.7
-
LargeAddick said:
where has he popped up from?ForeverAddickted said:Judge Clarke says it would be "unusual" for a court to grant an injunction for a short time when it hadn't granted it for a longer time. He says it doesn't mean the court has "no power" to grant an interim injunction while a party at least tries to go to Court of Appeal.
90th minute substitution.0 -
The judge says he doesn't think Lex Dominus appeal will be successful.
3 -
Lauren wants to pull out the infamous VOTV issue then.....from 3 years ago !!BR7_addick said:This is crap surely, what next?
Chasity: “As you can see judge Pearce, there’s lots of tweets saying imminent”0 -
I thought Sarr was the back up for Pearce..... Not Billy Clarke.1
-
Yeaa they're not getting their short injunction!!!5
This discussion has been closed.
