Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…99100102104105…175

Comments

  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,014
    Both Airman and Cawley manage to create panic by saying November instead of September!
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    blackpool72 said:
    Chaisty  now asking judge to give Rio a call and ask for his opinion 
    What about the taxi driving spurs fan? 
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,675
    LawrieAbrahams said:
    Thats OK , seven days is not long. 
    unless he wins the right to appeal and then we are looking at a lot longer.
  • ct_addick
    ct_addick Posts: 4,341
    Chaisty email sent

  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 36,117
    What happens in the next 7 days then?

    What happens after those 7 days are up? Do we go through the same scenario as today where Chaisty will obviously try to get another injunction?
  • J BLOCK
    J BLOCK Posts: 8,325
    So what do they hope to achieve in the next 7 days?
  • Dizzle
    Dizzle Posts: 5,190
    🤬 those dirty northern scumbags
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,080
    killerandflash said:
    Both Airman and Cawley manage to create panic by saying November instead of September!
    How is that possible? Was Cawley just using Airman’s updates as source material or was he actually on the call?
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,651
    SELR_addicks said:
    Ability to vary the timing of the injunction too. 

    We're fucked. 

    Chaisty is just going to vary it all the way up to the appeal and we start all over again. He's got his injunction through the backdoor.
    what do you mean "Chaisty is just going to vary it all the way up to the appeal" ?
  • ProperCharlton
    ProperCharlton Posts: 2,254
    I am so fed up of these cnuts. This temporary injunction is going to cost us more time we simply don't have. All they're interested in is money. Just fuck off and leave our club alone.

  • Sponsored links:



  • BR7_addick
    BR7_addick Posts: 10,217
    Okay then, a week of hell for Elliott up and coming then.  
  • Arsenetatters
    Arsenetatters Posts: 6,000
    At least he didn’t say ‘the next two weeks’
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,161
    Judge has advised they won't be successful though. Can TS pay PE to go away before then?
  • eaststandmike
    eaststandmike Posts: 14,956
    edited September 2020
    Callumcafc said:
    Cawley has updated to say September now. Bloody hell.
    Has anyone seen Cawley & ForeverAddickted in the same room  ;)
  • Leeds_Addick
    Leeds_Addick Posts: 4,713
    LargeAddick said:
    LawrieAbrahams said:
    Thats OK , seven days is not long. 
    unless he wins the right to appeal and then we are looking at a lot longer.
    We have to do it all over again next week. What a joke of a decision. 
  • PopIcon
    PopIcon Posts: 5,970
    TS giving it 99.9% sure the takeover would happen this week. By making that quote he has shot himself in the foot.
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,786
    ForeverAddickted said:
    The judge has effectively said that he doesn't believe Sandgaard's interest in buying Charlton will be affected by a short delay.
    How the fuck does he know that. 20 mins ago he wasn't even aware of Sandgaard.
  • ct_addick
    ct_addick Posts: 4,341
    The judge has effectively backtracked there....Pearce with a last minute OG
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,925
    Cawley confirms typo re date!!!!
  • The Prince-e-Paul
    The Prince-e-Paul Posts: 6,698
    Somebody please summarise the permeations. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,014
    A week is fine. As I said earlier it's annoying, but a minor inconvenience.
  • WSS
    WSS Posts: 25,083
    What happens if the CoA give a date? Then it keeps dragging out?
  • Leeds_Addick
    Leeds_Addick Posts: 4,713
    The Red Robin said:
    Judge has advised they won't be successful though. Can TS pay PE to go away before then?
    I hope he doesn't and PE loses next week and has another week of lawyer bills to pay
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,229
    edited September 2020
    Fuck em , give me administration and (all the stress that comes with it) Barclay and let these fucking parasites chew themselves to death cucking funts
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,786
    Rob7Lee said:
    robinofottershaw said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Club can’t now be sold until 4pm on September 9th. #cafc
    Sept 9th?
    He's effectively over turned what he said yesterday of not giving the injunction, but has now given it but time limited to 7 days.
    Can we appeal this. 

    No,  thought not.

    This is CAFC through & through. Always fucked.
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,506
    lancashire lad said:
    SELR_addicks said:
    Ability to vary the timing of the injunction too. 

    We're fucked. 

    Chaisty is just going to vary it all the way up to the appeal and we start all over again. He's got his injunction through the backdoor.
    what do you mean "Chaisty is just going to vary it all the way up to the appeal" ?
    "Each party given liberty to apply to vary the injunction but judge says he doesn’t encourage it."
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,080
    killerandflash said:
    A week is fine. As I said earlier it's annoying, but a minor inconvenience.
    Isn’t it just a week to obtain leave to appeal? I.e. if that’s granted the potential delay would be significantly longer?
  • J BLOCK
    J BLOCK Posts: 8,325
    So can someone explain what this means. What is going to happen in 7 days, another hearing or what? 
  • Mckforester
    Mckforester Posts: 851
    Need EFL to come up to the plate and reject that outstanding appeal, methinks
  • Leeds_Addick
    Leeds_Addick Posts: 4,713
    J BLOCK said:
    So can someone explain what this means. What is going to happen in 7 days, another hearing or what? 
    Same hearing as yesterday but in the court of appeal I think
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”