Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
General things that Annoy you
Comments
-
Lissie Harper has been severely let down by the refusal to increase the sentences handed down to the three wrong uns. Personally I’d have added six years to each taking it up to 22 years for Henry Long and 19 years for the other two. Serving two thirds of their sentences will see them out before they’re thirty, an age PC Andrew Harper never got to reach because of their criminality.3
-
Bixby
0 -
Offenders can be considered for parole after serving half to 2/3 of their custodial sentence but that does still rely on them being granted license. We can but hope that the gravity of the crime and the occupation of the victim will continue to inform the decision makers.AddickUpNorth said:Lissie Harper has been severely let down by the refusal to increase the sentences handed down to the three wrong uns. Personally I’d have added six years to each taking it up to 22 years for Henry Long and 19 years for the other two. Serving two thirds of their sentences will see them out before they’re thirty, an age PC Andrew Harper never got to reach because of their criminality.
Nature of these low lives will see them racking up the offenses while inside and recidivism will see them back in front of a beak within hours of their eventual release.
What are the chances that any ex-coppers serving as warders will have issues with these scum and their violent behaviour throughout their sojourn at HM's pleasure?0 -
Contacting Curry’s service partner hoping to get some help reactivating Netflix on a smart device and only being able to comprehend every 7th word of the person on the other end, So infuriating, I had to put the phone down.
A day later, going to a drive-thru KFC and having to repeat the order on the speaky thing about three times due to the person on the other end having such a poor comprehension of my Danny Dyer dialect.0 -
The inability of anyone on my company IT support team to actually read the request before getting in touch with me.0
-
StigThundercock said:
Offenders can be considered for parole after serving half to 2/3 of their custodial sentence but that does still rely on them being granted license. We can but hope that the gravity of the crime and the occupation of the victim will continue to inform the decision makers.AddickUpNorth said:Lissie Harper has been severely let down by the refusal to increase the sentences handed down to the three wrong uns. Personally I’d have added six years to each taking it up to 22 years for Henry Long and 19 years for the other two. Serving two thirds of their sentences will see them out before they’re thirty, an age PC Andrew Harper never got to reach because of their criminality.
Nature of these low lives will see them racking up the offenses while inside and recidivism will see them back in front of a beak within hours of their eventual release.
What are the chances that any ex-coppers serving as warders will have issues with these scum and their violent behaviour throughout their sojourn at HM's pleasure?
The system’s changed, they have to do two thirds and because they received determinate sentences that’s when they’ll be released unless they misbehave inside and get extra days added. Upon release they will serve the remainder of their sentences on licence for the final third and can be recalled to prison if they breach their conditions whatever they may be. The probation service is understaffed and in a bit of a mess at the moment but because of the victims job I’m certain they’ll be monitored extremely closely and as you say because of the kind of people they are I find it hard to believe that at least one if not all three will be recalled at some point.
I personally don’t know any ex-police officers who have joined the job, it’s usually the other way round and officers, especially the younger ones, leave to join the police. As for any chance of them getting a bit of natural justice at the hands of officers then I can’t see it. It just doesn’t really happen these days. The other cons of course won’t look down on them because of their offence, some indeed may give them a pat on the back.3 -
Yeah right, you'll be telling us they've removed the soap from the shower rooms nextAddickUpNorth said:StigThundercock said:
Offenders can be considered for parole after serving half to 2/3 of their custodial sentence but that does still rely on them being granted license. We can but hope that the gravity of the crime and the occupation of the victim will continue to inform the decision makers.AddickUpNorth said:Lissie Harper has been severely let down by the refusal to increase the sentences handed down to the three wrong uns. Personally I’d have added six years to each taking it up to 22 years for Henry Long and 19 years for the other two. Serving two thirds of their sentences will see them out before they’re thirty, an age PC Andrew Harper never got to reach because of their criminality.
Nature of these low lives will see them racking up the offenses while inside and recidivism will see them back in front of a beak within hours of their eventual release.
What are the chances that any ex-coppers serving as warders will have issues with these scum and their violent behaviour throughout their sojourn at HM's pleasure?
The system’s changed, they have to do two thirds and because they received determinate sentences that’s when they’ll be released unless they misbehave inside and get extra days added. Upon release they will serve the remainder of their sentences on licence for the final third and can be recalled to prison if they breach their conditions whatever they may be. The probation service is understaffed and in a bit of a mess at the moment but because of the victims job I’m certain they’ll be monitored extremely closely and as you say because of the kind of people they are I find it hard to believe that at least one if not all three will be recalled at some point.
I personally don’t know any ex-police officers who have joined the job, it’s usually the other way round and officers, especially the younger ones, leave to join the police. As for any chance of them getting a bit of natural justice at the hands of officers then I can’t see it. It just doesn’t really happen these days. The other cons of course won’t look down on them because of their offence, some indeed may give them a pat on the back.
0 -
DHL not delivering the Christmas hamper that my company sent me and not bothering to reply when asked where it is.0
-
DHL delivering a Christmas hamper to me I never ordered.Wilma said:DHL not delivering the Christmas hamper that my company sent me and not bothering to reply when asked where it is.10 -
Enjoy the port!eaststandmike said:
DHL delivering a Christmas hamper to me I never ordered.Wilma said:DHL not delivering the Christmas hamper that my company sent me and not bothering to reply when asked where it is.2 - Sponsored links:
-
First world problems, but I haven't had any post for two weeks. Grrrr!0
-
I did.......hic!Wilma said:
Enjoy the port!eaststandmike said:
DHL delivering a Christmas hamper to me I never ordered.Wilma said:DHL not delivering the Christmas hamper that my company sent me and not bothering to reply when asked where it is.1 -
I keep opening the door in expectation and looking forlornly at an empty mat.1
-
Privatisation not gone well then I guess?hawksmoor said:I keep opening the door in expectation and looking forlornly at an empty mat.0 -
I’ve had two non fault accidents on my motorcycle in the last two years, one was a van doing a u turn and the other a driver pulled onto the other side of the road hitting me into oncoming traffic, Both drivers did not look and both drivers did not indicate. There were plenty of witnesses including an off duty copper.StigThundercock said:Annoyed isn't the word:
Driver kills other motorist through admitted neglect and gets a 2 year driving ban plus 2 year suspended sentence. Has spent no time in custody and will spend no time in custody. The culprit's admission to the court that she was distracted by her mobile phone, "saw brake lights ahead but thought the traffic was still moving" will have been the most favourable wording possible without actually telling a lie. She claimed "I couldn't have been doing more than 70" - accident investigators estimate her speed at impact between 35 and 45 mph so she clearly had no mind on what she was doing at all.
Utter disgrace Judge has cast the value of the slain motorcyclist at zero.
Of course there is no suggestion the killer intended to harm anybody but to get off scot free essentially absolves her of responsibility for her actions.
Accidentally killing someone is still manslaughter.
Getting behind the wheel of a motorcar puts the driver in charge of a ton of metal and unequivocally responsible for everything that happens from that point forward. Ploughing into the back of stationery traffic on a dual carriageway because you admit to not paying sufficient attention to notice the traffic has stopped is exactly the same as jumping a red light on a pedestrian crossing. This reckless moron is a danger to society and her punishment should reflect that.
If she'd carelessly kicked a brick off some scaffolding and killed a passer by she'd be done for manslaughter and serve a minimum 5 years - the death was accidental but the cause was wanton negligence rooted in reckless self-absorbed irresponsibility - do that at the wheel of a car and judges lose all grip on reason and responsibility.
This particular blight on the judiciary and stain on humanity has to be defrocked immediately - he simply has no actual regard for human life at all. Were the fatality someone he knew, let alone a member of his family would he think differently - or at all? He's robbing our taxes to let negligent killers off scot free.
You can find the names of the culprit and the moron in the wig in today's tabloid press.
I was battered in both incidents both bikes written off and both third party drivers admitted full and total liability. And I had substantial time off to recover and the second accident caused me to lose my job.
In both cases I received a letter saying that it was not in the public’s interest to prosecute the other drivers even though I was six inches away from being brown bread in on of the incident.
Remember the above when you get a £60 fine for doing 34 mph in a 30 zone.
8 -
Here's a great tip for keen runners.
Watch the news for 5 minutes before you go for your morning run, then it might actually occur to you to give people a wide berth when you're running past them, rather than panting your sweaty breath all over the back of my neck as you jog past me, even though you've got about 4 metres of width that you could have made use of.
Tossers.10 -
MrLargo said:Here's a great tip for keen runners.
Watch the news for 5 minutes before you go for your morning run, then it might actually occur to you to give people a wide berth when you're running past them, rather than panting your sweaty breath all over the back of my neck as you jog past me, even though you've got about 4 metres of width that you could have made use of.
Tossers.
6 -
Our daughter dropping the presents to the back of our car parked on our driveway and we’re having a conversation with her and my Granddaughter via the windows of our lounge when a passerby acknowledged this by saying that it’s sad that this situation has arisen and families are having to meet like this grabbing a 5 minute chat in the garden and fuck me if he doesn’t try and join in the conversation. How about fuck off and let us have that 5 minute chat in peace. 😡11
-
When, after 2 to 3 spoonfulls, you realise the creme fraiche you're lapping up with your brownie is actually double cream that's turned......2
- Sponsored links:
-
Creme not so fraichei_b_b_o_r_g said:When, after 2 to 3 spoonfulls, you realise the creme fraiche you're lapping up with your brownie is actually double cream that's turned......2 -
Torville and Dean flying to Alaska to skate on a glacier to promote climate change0
-
They didn’t fly, they skated all the way there.1
-
Ryanair’s advertisement tag line;
”Jab and Go”.2 -
Inconsiderate bastards who get right up your arse when the driving conditions are treacherous. The B road I drive to work on was icy as hell this morning yet some prick decided to ride my tail no more than six feet. Braked a few times to try and send him a message but he still continued. Absolute wanker.7
-
When they get the chance as well, they're the ones who come along side you and shout that you need to learn to drive!!AddickUpNorth said:Inconsiderate bastards who get right up your arse when the driving conditions are treacherous. The B road I drive to work on was icy as hell this morning yet some prick decided to ride my tail no more than six feet. Braked a few times to try and send him a message but he still continued. Absolute wanker.1 -
No, can’t say it’s ever happened to me! 😉ForeverAddickted said:
When they get the chance as well, they're the ones who come along side you and shout that you need to learn to drive!!AddickUpNorth said:Inconsiderate bastards who get right up your arse when the driving conditions are treacherous. The B road I drive to work on was icy as hell this morning yet some prick decided to ride my tail no more than six feet. Braked a few times to try and send him a message but he still continued. Absolute wanker.
5 -
You can say that T_C_E, but many years ago, I was driving with two GSD's in the back, one was a male and weighed 9 stone, but some young idiot tried to cut me up on a main road, he eventually got passed me and pulled up and got out ready for a fight. I drove passed slowly and said perhaps you would like to argue with my passengers and he shook his fist at me and gave me some choice language.0
-
Not interested in any sort of confrontation these days, life’s to short.6
This discussion has been closed.
