Disappointing episode but I'm not against it being Buckles, at least it was a twist. Not sure it being anyone other than Carmichael would have satisfied the viewers.
Jed Mercurio is too good of a writer. This is definitely not the end of this story.
On what basis is he a good writer?
A story with more holes in it than a pack of polos. Souless characters. Rushed storylines that make little sense. Poor attention to detail.... I could go on.
I have never understood the hyperbole that follows this turkey of a series around.
So 'H" was none other than Benny from crossroads! A character of such non entity proportions that I cannot remember ever seeing him in any of the other series
Jed Mercurio is too good of a writer. This is definitely not the end of this story.
On what basis is he a good writer?
A story with more holes in it than a pack of polos. Souless characters. Rushed storylines that make little sense. Poor attention to detail.... I could go on.
I have never understood the hyperbole that follows this turkey of a series around.
Comments
A shit ending for a show that has been shit post series 2.
You mugs!!
;-)
But there is more to come.
A story with more holes in it than a pack of polos. Souless characters. Rushed storylines that make little sense. Poor attention to detail.... I could go on.
I have never understood the hyperbole that follows this turkey of a series around.
There is no WPLOD7 Ltd on Companies House...
Deal in place for Buckles to get immunity.
System engineered so there’s no investigation into corruption.
Buckles is the fall guy. Osborne is running the show.
If not why did she get witness protection?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p09gftky
Agree that the ending was a bit flat. The episode didn’t have any real drama.
A character of such non entity proportions that I cannot remember ever seeing him in any of the other series