Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket 2022

1…1112141617…146

Comments

  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,855
    How few no balls do Jimmy and Broady bowl? Get your action and runup perfected with practice
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,795
    Seriously. When it is that hard to take wickets why does a bowler bowl no balls. It wasn't as if it were his first one - it was his fifth. For the sake of going back a few inches. Brain dead.
  • Todds_right_hook
    Todds_right_hook Posts: 10,884
    Addick Addict said:
    Seriously. When it is that hard to take wickets why does a bowler bowl no balls. It wasn't as if it were his first one - it was his fifth. For the sake of going back a few inches. Brain dead.
    I'm guessing England took a wicket off a no ball? Who was it?
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,855
    Todds_right_hook said:
    Addick Addict said:
    Seriously. When it is that hard to take wickets why does a bowler bowl no balls. It wasn't as if it were his first one - it was his fifth. For the sake of going back a few inches. Brain dead.
    I'm guessing England took a wicket off a no ball? Who was it?
    Mahmood

    Would have been his maiden wicket
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,795
    Todds_right_hook said:
    Addick Addict said:
    Seriously. When it is that hard to take wickets why does a bowler bowl no balls. It wasn't as if it were his first one - it was his fifth. For the sake of going back a few inches. Brain dead.
    I'm guessing England took a wicket off a no ball? Who was it?
    Mahmood - would have been his first Test wicket too!
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,855
    England finally get a breakthrough, and it's Lawrence who gets it
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,339
    I imagine that when the tour party was picked, very few pundits would have imagined that Dan Lawrence would be second in the 2022 Test bowling averages by now. 

    And absolutely none at all would have guessed he'd only be behind Ross Taylor. 
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,319
    No substitute for revs on the ball. Lawrence gives it a massive rip, needs to be taken a lot more seriously as a bowler
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,855
    Leuth said:
    No substitute for revs on the ball. Lawrence gives it a massive rip, needs to be taken a lot more seriously as a bowler
    He has a weird action for an off spinner, the wheeling arms are more like that of a leggie!
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,855
    The Windies batting is putting our 500 into perspective, especially on a more worn pitch
  • Sponsored links:



  • suzisausage
    suzisausage Posts: 11,502
    killerandflash said:
    Leuth said:
    No substitute for revs on the ball. Lawrence gives it a massive rip, needs to be taken a lot more seriously as a bowler
    He has a weird action for an off spinner, the wheeling arms are more like that of a leggie!
    Looks like a gangly teenager. Almost left after the over before the wicket. Windies fans found their voices in the last hour and were very funny. 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,630
    Leech is worse than Giles. No turn & no flight. Both Root & Lawrence are better bowlers......and they are part timers. 
  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,674
    killerandflash said:
    Leuth said:
    No substitute for revs on the ball. Lawrence gives it a massive rip, needs to be taken a lot more seriously as a bowler
    He has a weird action for an off spinner, the wheeling arms are more like that of a leggie!
    Frog in a blender is young Dan Lawrence 
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,319
    I hope we're not dissing offies who bowl with a legspinner's run-up
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,730
    Two bang average teams playing on a lifeless track. 
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,319
    I wonder if Lawrence will get an extended bowl today. Considering he looked more dangerous than the rest of them combined, you'd hope so
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,855
    Leuth said:
    I wonder if Lawrence will get an extended bowl today. Considering he looked more dangerous than the rest of them combined, you'd hope so
    He should have been tried yesterday earlier

    The only way this game can be interesting is if England can bowl the Windies out fairly cheaply, bat quickly and declare, but it's a very long shot
  • Rudders22
    Rudders22 Posts: 3,864
    Draw
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,680
    Rudders22 said:
    Draw
    It would take at least six days cricket to get a result on this wicket. 
    I understand why they have done it but it's not good to watch.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,855
    Brathwaite is finally out. Half way through day 4 and he's finally not involved in the game!
  • Sponsored links:



  • suzisausage
    suzisausage Posts: 11,502
    blackpool72 said:
    Rudders22 said:
    Draw
    It would take at least six days cricket to get a result on this wicket. 
    I understand why they have done it but it's not good to watch.
    I mean, it’s not awful to watch. 
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,012
    killerandflash said:
    Leuth said:
    I wonder if Lawrence will get an extended bowl today. Considering he looked more dangerous than the rest of them combined, you'd hope so
    He should have been tried yesterday earlier

    The only way this game can be interesting is if England can bowl the Windies out fairly cheaply, bat quickly and declare, but it's a very long shot
    I watch all of England's games, rarely miss a ball.
    But this match is so boring I forgot we were playing until about 10 minutes ago.
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,630
    suzisausage said:
    blackpool72 said:
    Rudders22 said:
    Draw
    It would take at least six days cricket to get a result on this wicket. 
    I understand why they have done it but it's not good to watch.
    I mean, it’s not awful to watch. 
    Not awful, just tiresome.

    W.indies have no thought of doing anything but to bat, bat & bat some more......without accumulating many runs. I dont think I've seen a team take the 2nd new ball & the opposition having less than 400 runs.

    This is a dead game. Even if it were a timeless test the teams would have to call it a draw as England would need to catch their flight home !
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,630
    I hate there being DRS but the bowling side not being able to use it. Australia showed at Headingley in 2019 how "using up your reviews" takes away the fact there could be an umpiring howler & it goes unpunished. DRS should be taken away from the players & put it the hands of the umpires, like VAR in football. 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,855
    In this situation, I think the previous rule where the reviews are renewed when a new ball is taken seems fairer. 182 overs is an awful lot with just 3 reviews
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,795
    411 all out

    Leach 3-118 off one ball short of 70 overs. His average prior to this had been 22 overs per innings and he surpassed that with his 27 maidens alone in this innings
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,855
    Those England batsmen who came out to the Windies to be destroyed by their legendary fast bowlers on fast bouncy wickets, would be looking longingly at this pitch with the Windies opening the bowling with a spinner.
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,680
    suzisausage said:
    blackpool72 said:
    Rudders22 said:
    Draw
    It would take at least six days cricket to get a result on this wicket. 
    I understand why they have done it but it's not good to watch.
    I mean, it’s not awful to watch. 
    It is when you know a draw is the only possible result 
  • clb74
    clb74 Posts: 10,824
    blackpool72 said:
    suzisausage said:
    blackpool72 said:
    Rudders22 said:
    Draw
    It would take at least six days cricket to get a result on this wicket. 
    I understand why they have done it but it's not good to watch.
    I mean, it’s not awful to watch. 
    It is when you know a draw is the only possible result 
    Have 6 grand on the draw then to win a grand.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,012
    It's probably not bad to watch if you're in Barbados.
    I could definitely tolerate it  :)

Categories

“Marketplace”