Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
The exodus begins (Watson, Gunter. Souare to be released)
Comments
-
With Inniss, we don't have the medical information that is necessary for the decision. We do have evidence of the past couple of seasons but the prognosis is key.3
-
And of the course the usual club bashing when players take to social media to announce there departure before the club does an announcement to cover all departures in one go.Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:WIOTOS I'll start rejoicing.
I imagine they will hold back on any official announcement until decisions have been made on all OOC players.
0 -
We don't need any prognosis, just a bit of common sense.MuttleyCAFC said:With Inniss, we don't have the medical information that is necessary for the decision. We do have evidence of the past couple of seasons but the prognosis is key.5 -
-
Good, honestly don't think I'd miss any of the out of contract players, even if they all left3
-
It's about time the club released each player's blood type so we can decide whether they stay or goMuttleyCAFC said:With Inniss, we don't have the medical information that is necessary for the decision. We do have evidence of the past couple of seasons but the prognosis is key.
2 -
Thank goodness Watson will be gone. My least favourite player since Amady Faye.
Hopefully Henderson, Innis, Pearce and Davisson are added to that list and we don't bring any of the loanees back except maybe Famewo.0 -
The others staying or going isn't really as important. Those 3 and the 6 loans create quite a lot of gaps that need filling.
Saying that I hope Washington and JFC don't leave because we fannied around and we find out at the last minute (like Amos and Chuks).
Keeping Pearce AND Inniss would be mental.
Keeping, or not, Henderson matters neither way. Doesn't count to the cap so its only wages, that's Thomas's problem, not mine.
I would actually rather keep Purrington and Matthews over some of the players that are under contract, especially now there effective backups have gone.4 -
Henderson isn't needed. He's not good or fit enough to challenge McG and would be blocking the pathway for our younger keepers as well.Cafc43v3r said:The others staying or going isn't really as important. Those 3 and the 6 loans create quite a lot of gaps that need filling.
Saying that I hope Washington and JFC don't leave because we fannied around and we find out at the last minute (like Amos and Chuks).
Keeping Pearce AND Inniss would be mental.
Keeping, or not, Henderson matters neither way. Doesn't count to the cap so its only wages, that's Thomas's problem, not mine.
I would actually rather keep Purrington and Matthews over some of the players that are under contract, especially now there effective backups have gone.
The big keeping question is whether AMB is good enough to be a our number one next season11 -
If we offer Davison a contract and he turns it down won’t we be entitled to a fee from the new club (I.e what happened with fosu).0
-
Sponsored links:
-
Does Jacko actually want Washington to stay?
If so, something should have been offered by now. If not, then maybe he's being polite1 -
No he isn't needed but it makes no real difference either way if he is here or not? How many times have we used a sub keeper in the last 5 years?killerandflash said:
Henderson isn't needed. He's not good or fit enough to challenge McG and would be blocking the pathway for our younger keepers as well.Cafc43v3r said:The others staying or going isn't really as important. Those 3 and the 6 loans create quite a lot of gaps that need filling.
Saying that I hope Washington and JFC don't leave because we fannied around and we find out at the last minute (like Amos and Chuks).
Keeping Pearce AND Inniss would be mental.
Keeping, or not, Henderson matters neither way. Doesn't count to the cap so its only wages, that's Thomas's problem, not mine.
I would actually rather keep Purrington and Matthews over some of the players that are under contract, especially now there effective backups have gone.
The big keeping question is whether AMB is good enough to be a our number one next season
I would rather he wasted his Saturday afternoons and let the younger ones play for the u23s or in the national league when we could call them back over night.0 -
God its not until you see the list of loan players in black & white you realise how bad it is, hope they all get shown the door.0
-
Sage I believe indicated that he did, and I’m inclined to take note of what he says - however does seem somewhat suspicious if we’ve not even approached him about his contract situation - but maybe that’s just something lost in translation.killerandflash said:Does Jacko actually want Washington to stay?
If so, something should have been offered by now. If not, then maybe he's being polite0 -
We don't decide. The club will based on more information than we have.West2003 said:
It's about time the club released each player's blood type so we can decide whether they stay or goMuttleyCAFC said:With Inniss, we don't have the medical information that is necessary for the decision. We do have evidence of the past couple of seasons but the prognosis is key.0 -
Sage I believe indicated that he did, and I’m inclined to take note of what he says - however does seem somewhat suspicious if we’ve not even approached him about his contract situation - but maybe that’s just something lost in translation.killerandflash said:Does Jacko actually want Washington to stay?
If so, something should have been offered by now. If not, then maybe he's being polite0 -
His career history tells me all I need to know. Offering him a new deal would be ridiculous. He’s 27 in the summer and never played 30 games in a season.MuttleyCAFC said:With Inniss, we don't have the medical information that is necessary for the decision. We do have evidence of the past couple of seasons but the prognosis is key.
13 -
Has Washington not been approached with a formal offer or has he not ben approached full stop regarding his future? Jackson says there are ongoing discussions so I wonder if there's still pre-offer negotiations with agents or if we've actually been totally radio silent on new deals.
1 -
I suspect Jackson does. They can't use the "we don't know what divison we will be in" excuse this year.killerandflash said:Does Jacko actually want Washington to stay?
If so, something should have been offered by now. If not, then maybe he's being polite
Are they using the we don't know who the manager will be one instead?
Surely it's not that a hard question to answer if everything else is stable?0 -
Good riddance, Hopefully at least 10 more follow them out the club. All 6 loans can do one.
Also get rid of
Morgan
Pearce
Innis
Matthews
Not fussed if I never see Gilbey, Purrington or DJ again, but can accept them being in the squad next season.4 -
Sponsored links:
-
Agree on all of that, but i think we'll offer either Inniss or Pearce a deal, but not both.killerandflash said:
My guess as to what will happenScoham said:No surprise but good to see it confirmed.
Decisions to come on:
Henderson
Matthews
Inniss
Pearce
Purrington
JFC
Davison
Washington
Plus 6 loanees will be going:
Famewo
Castillo
Lee
John
Leko
Burstow
Also have Kirk who seems likely he’ll be sold or loaned out again.
On replacements TS said 2-5 permanents and 5 or 6 loans to come in. That must be assuming no one under contract is unexpectedly sold.Henderson - definitely releasedMatthews - 50/50 chances of a FOURTH one year dealInniss - 50/50Pearce - 50/50 player/coach role but the squad number rules count against having a player/coachPurrington - 50/50 depending on who else staysJFC - new contract offeredDavison - new contract offered but might choose to leave to get regular footballWashington - new contract offered
Of course the players may choose not to stay themselves, even if offered a new deal
Wouldn't be against giving Purrington another year, certainly not as first choice but he can provide cover for both LB and LCB and i think with the new squad limit restrictions, players who can cover more than 1 position will be key.1 -
Lets hope theres a lot more to come, got to be one of the worst squads we’ve had!1
-
I think so, yesSouthWest_Addicks said:If we offer Davison a contract and he turns it down won’t we be entitled to a fee from the new club (I.e what happened with fosu).0 -
Only disappointing news is hearing there's nothing on the table for Washington yet. He's only our second (and could still be top) scorer.
Could we get better? Probably. Could we get better plus all the other necessary upgrades? Probably not.0 -
You could get one better but not two. That's the key question.CL_Phantom said:Only disappointing news is hearing there's nothing on the table for Washington yet. He's only our second (and could still be top) scorer.
Could we get better? Probably. Could we get better plus all the other necessary upgrades? Probably not.4 -
Do we not need a right footed back up for Lavelle? Preferably a taller version.Scoham said:I can see us keeping more defenders than we’d like because so many are out of contract or on loan.
I’ll be disappointed if Inniss stays as he doesn’t play enough games and when fit can’t play twice a week.
Can see Pearce staying as back up for Lavelle.
I’d like to see Matthews go. Could see DJ as the back up RWB but it could leave us short if we need to switch to a back four, though Clare moving across is an option.
Purrington will probably stay as a versatile squad player.
Davison might step up to L1 in time but he’s never going to get the game time he needs here to develop. Not realistic to loan him out for a year or two at his age when he can get a a good longer term deal elsewhere.0 -
Henderson BYE
Matthews OFFER DEAL
Inniss BYE
Pearce COACHING ROLE
Purrington OFFER DEAL
JFC OFFER DEAL
Davison BYE
Washington OFFER DEAL
Is how I see it going, with Purrington, Washington and Forster-Caskey staying and Matthews turning it down and moving on.
Combined with the releases and the loanees going back, would leave us to sign
RWB x 1
CB x 3
CM x 1
AM x 1
ST x 1
And then replace anyone who leaves too like Kirk, though if we're sticking to 352, no point in signing wingers to replace ones leaving.
Macgillivray Maynard-Brewer
New DJLavelle NewClare NewElewere NewBlackett-Taylor PurringtonDobson NewJFC GilbeyFraser NewStockley AnekeWashington New
Is that good enough to go up? Not IMO, you need better options in midfield than we currently have, especially creatively, and I don't particularly want to see Clare, Purrington or Gilbey play a major role next season, not to mention the worst first choice keeper we've had since Weaver in goal0 -
Not when we only use them as the central CB in a back 3.JamesSeed said:
Do we not need a right footed back up for Lavelle? Preferably a taller version.Scoham said:I can see us keeping more defenders than we’d like because so many are out of contract or on loan.
I’ll be disappointed if Inniss stays as he doesn’t play enough games and when fit can’t play twice a week.
Can see Pearce staying as back up for Lavelle.
I’d like to see Matthews go. Could see DJ as the back up RWB but it could leave us short if we need to switch to a back four, though Clare moving across is an option.
Purrington will probably stay as a versatile squad player.
Davison might step up to L1 in time but he’s never going to get the game time he needs here to develop. Not realistic to loan him out for a year or two at his age when he can get a a good longer term deal elsewhere.
Ideally we need two left footed CBs to replace Famewo, though I can see Purrington staying and covering there.1 -
I think we should moving Clare up to CM.
As good as he has been there has been time where we have cried for an out & out CB.
Plus the energy he brings and the way he carries the ball would be a major asset.10 -
shirty5 said:Mr Dangerfield is not hanging around then…
"Ruthless" Ron Dangerfield swinging the axe already.
Talked to a Maldon & Tiptree mate last night and he described him as "fearless".
16
