Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Summer 2022 transfer rumours (Gilbey loan confirmed p513, a signing falls through last minute p541)
Comments
-
NabySarr said:Athletico Charlton said:thenewbie said:supaclive said:Garrymanilow said:There's a lot of flap about Dobson based on no evidence so far but I'm fairly calm about whether he stays or goes. I do think he's a better passer of the ball than he's given credit for and I think he could play higher up the pitch if we're playing a deep-lying playmaker at the base of the midfield rather than a destroyer. Having said that though, if Garner has decided that he doesn't suit what he's going to do then in terms of a sale his stock will never be higher than it is now after winning POTY, and with our well-stocked midfield we could afford to move him on more than we can afford to go into the bulk of the season without another winger and another striker. Some players just don't suit how a manager wants to play, and if Dobson falls into that category and Garner feels we don't need him because we have McGrandles doing a similar but slightly different role, and we use the money from his sale to get in a goal-scoring winger and some competition for Stockley then I'm happy. The most viable strategy any team has these days is to get decent players in and sell them on at a profit to bring in more decent players. We got Dobson for nothing, if Garner doesn't play with a player like him and we sell him for cash then that's not necessarily a bad thing. If this is all smoke though then I'm sure he can play in front of a deeper midfielder and play well. We'll just have to see what happens.
I simply disagree
Dobson is better than McGrandles
Payne
Gilbey
Morgan
JFC
Fraser
He was our RUNAWAY player of the year.
Selling him because he's valuable is stupid economics if it makes us worse, which it will.
The only one of those players you can realistically compare him to is McGrandles as the others just don't play in the same way or position. Certainly he is much, much better than Fraser or Payne defensively but I doubt he would bring as much going forward so I can't get behind the idea he's objectively THAT much better.
Near enough every season since relegation from the PL we have sold our best player at the end of the year and fans on here have written what you have written. Every season it has failed which ultimately has led to something like 8-9 seasons in L1 and us establishing ourselves as a mid table team in the lower leagues.
Dobson should be in the team, no arguments. He is decent but won't command a fee of sufficient size to make a difference to us imo.
Also if struggling with FFP then Sandgaard can simply put equity in and solve the situation. His aim is PL afterall so he must have known that would cost him a lot of £m's.
Plus,how much would we get for Dobbo anyway. No L1 club have any money, he won't be going to the PL so that leaves the Championship. Half of them are potless, I would be amazed if we got more than £500K. It won't make a hot of difference.3 -
Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:thenewbie said:supaclive said:thenewbie said:supaclive said:Garrymanilow said:There's a lot of flap about Dobson based on no evidence so far but I'm fairly calm about whether he stays or goes. I do think he's a better passer of the ball than he's given credit for and I think he could play higher up the pitch if we're playing a deep-lying playmaker at the base of the midfield rather than a destroyer. Having said that though, if Garner has decided that he doesn't suit what he's going to do then in terms of a sale his stock will never be higher than it is now after winning POTY, and with our well-stocked midfield we could afford to move him on more than we can afford to go into the bulk of the season without another winger and another striker. Some players just don't suit how a manager wants to play, and if Dobson falls into that category and Garner feels we don't need him because we have McGrandles doing a similar but slightly different role, and we use the money from his sale to get in a goal-scoring winger and some competition for Stockley then I'm happy. The most viable strategy any team has these days is to get decent players in and sell them on at a profit to bring in more decent players. We got Dobson for nothing, if Garner doesn't play with a player like him and we sell him for cash then that's not necessarily a bad thing. If this is all smoke though then I'm sure he can play in front of a deeper midfielder and play well. We'll just have to see what happens.
I simply disagree
Dobson is better than McGrandles
Payne
Gilbey
Morgan
JFC
Fraser
He was our RUNAWAY player of the year.
Selling him because he's valuable is stupid economics if it makes us worse, which it will.
The only one of those players you can realistically compare him to is McGrandles as the others just don't play in the same way or position. Certainly he is much, much better than Fraser or Payne defensively but I doubt he would bring as much going forward so I can't get behind the idea he's objectively THAT much better.
That's the wrong idea
We have an option for another year
We should build a team around him
We can discuss this in 46 games time. IF it happens.
He's probably the best outright defensive midfielder we have but in terms of all round play I would say a fully fit JFC is the better all round player, and in terms of a threat going forward CBT is certainly much more potent, with Fraser showing signs of blossoming in a formation that suits him and McGrandles and Payne both coming in with good reputations. Even if he WAS our best player it doesn't mean he still is.
I don't want him sold, I don't even think that Garner or Sandgaard want to get rid of him but IF he does end up going I don't think he's going to be as missed as much by this season's squad (sic) as he would've been last season.
I have "liked" @Fanny Fanackapan's post above because I share her view that it would seem distasteful to dispense of George in such a cavalier fashion after his magnificent and wholehearted contribution to last year's campaign and seemingly without affording him the opportunity to show what he can do within the new set-up.
But, and this is the big but, fans are fickle.
If we are storming the league the sale of George (if it happens) will in all probability soon be forgotten and there will be those who will laud it as a shrewd bit of business if it allows funds to strengthen BG's squad and vision.
If however we are floundering and witnessing oppo teams storming through our defence like a knife through butter, without the option of a player who's raison d'etre was breaking up those threats, then Benny Boy may well be toast.
The whole exercise is pretty pointless anyway as I fully expect Dobson to be here this season. He’s not good enough for the Championship yet IMO.2 -
NabySarr said:supaclive said:NabySarr said:supaclive said:NabySarr said:Athletico Charlton said:thenewbie said:supaclive said:Garrymanilow said:There's a lot of flap about Dobson based on no evidence so far but I'm fairly calm about whether he stays or goes. I do think he's a better passer of the ball than he's given credit for and I think he could play higher up the pitch if we're playing a deep-lying playmaker at the base of the midfield rather than a destroyer. Having said that though, if Garner has decided that he doesn't suit what he's going to do then in terms of a sale his stock will never be higher than it is now after winning POTY, and with our well-stocked midfield we could afford to move him on more than we can afford to go into the bulk of the season without another winger and another striker. Some players just don't suit how a manager wants to play, and if Dobson falls into that category and Garner feels we don't need him because we have McGrandles doing a similar but slightly different role, and we use the money from his sale to get in a goal-scoring winger and some competition for Stockley then I'm happy. The most viable strategy any team has these days is to get decent players in and sell them on at a profit to bring in more decent players. We got Dobson for nothing, if Garner doesn't play with a player like him and we sell him for cash then that's not necessarily a bad thing. If this is all smoke though then I'm sure he can play in front of a deeper midfielder and play well. We'll just have to see what happens.
I simply disagree
Dobson is better than McGrandles
Payne
Gilbey
Morgan
JFC
Fraser
He was our RUNAWAY player of the year.
Selling him because he's valuable is stupid economics if it makes us worse, which it will.
The only one of those players you can realistically compare him to is McGrandles as the others just don't play in the same way or position. Certainly he is much, much better than Fraser or Payne defensively but I doubt he would bring as much going forward so I can't get behind the idea he's objectively THAT much better.
Near enough every season since relegation from the PL we have sold our best player at the end of the year and fans on here have written what you have written. Every season it has failed which ultimately has led to something like 8-9 seasons in L1 and us establishing ourselves as a mid table team in the lower leagues.
Dobson should be in the team, no arguments. He is decent but won't command a fee of sufficient size to make a difference to us imo.
You don't sell your best players if you want to get promoted
One team
Who bought one of our players we got rid of
They are unique
Like Charlton of the early 2000s
Once in a generation team / set up
You winWe need 3 or 4 more players if we are to even have a chance of getting near the top 6, selling Dobson might be the only way we can get those players. As I’ve said, hopefully we can sell others and keep Dobson, but I think that will be difficult as i doubt there’s a queue of teams looking to sign the likes of Gilbey. Signing 3/4 more players is more important than keeping Dobson
Get rid of
Morgan (I actually like him)
Gilbey
JFC (would like to keep him)
Before our BEST player
Should I bring up every glowing comment we all made on him last year or do we all have such short memories?2 -
Serious question - what would Dobbo be worth in this market ? (I fear not a lot)3
-
supaclive said:NabySarr said:supaclive said:NabySarr said:supaclive said:NabySarr said:Athletico Charlton said:thenewbie said:supaclive said:Garrymanilow said:There's a lot of flap about Dobson based on no evidence so far but I'm fairly calm about whether he stays or goes. I do think he's a better passer of the ball than he's given credit for and I think he could play higher up the pitch if we're playing a deep-lying playmaker at the base of the midfield rather than a destroyer. Having said that though, if Garner has decided that he doesn't suit what he's going to do then in terms of a sale his stock will never be higher than it is now after winning POTY, and with our well-stocked midfield we could afford to move him on more than we can afford to go into the bulk of the season without another winger and another striker. Some players just don't suit how a manager wants to play, and if Dobson falls into that category and Garner feels we don't need him because we have McGrandles doing a similar but slightly different role, and we use the money from his sale to get in a goal-scoring winger and some competition for Stockley then I'm happy. The most viable strategy any team has these days is to get decent players in and sell them on at a profit to bring in more decent players. We got Dobson for nothing, if Garner doesn't play with a player like him and we sell him for cash then that's not necessarily a bad thing. If this is all smoke though then I'm sure he can play in front of a deeper midfielder and play well. We'll just have to see what happens.
I simply disagree
Dobson is better than McGrandles
Payne
Gilbey
Morgan
JFC
Fraser
He was our RUNAWAY player of the year.
Selling him because he's valuable is stupid economics if it makes us worse, which it will.
The only one of those players you can realistically compare him to is McGrandles as the others just don't play in the same way or position. Certainly he is much, much better than Fraser or Payne defensively but I doubt he would bring as much going forward so I can't get behind the idea he's objectively THAT much better.
Near enough every season since relegation from the PL we have sold our best player at the end of the year and fans on here have written what you have written. Every season it has failed which ultimately has led to something like 8-9 seasons in L1 and us establishing ourselves as a mid table team in the lower leagues.
Dobson should be in the team, no arguments. He is decent but won't command a fee of sufficient size to make a difference to us imo.
You don't sell your best players if you want to get promoted
One team
Who bought one of our players we got rid of
They are unique
Like Charlton of the early 2000s
Once in a generation team / set up
You winWe need 3 or 4 more players if we are to even have a chance of getting near the top 6, selling Dobson might be the only way we can get those players. As I’ve said, hopefully we can sell others and keep Dobson, but I think that will be difficult as i doubt there’s a queue of teams looking to sign the likes of Gilbey. Signing 3/4 more players is more important than keeping Dobson
Get rid of
Morgan (I actually like him)
Gilbey
JFC (would like to keep him)
Before our BEST player
Should I bring up every glowing comment we all made on him last year or do we all have such short memories?Our mistake was probably signing this many midfielders before getting rid of any. Teams now know we need to get one or two of them off the books so will be looking for a cheap deal. It might be that we have to play Payne further forward as otherwise we might be stuck with 7 central midfielders and holes elsewhere in the team.1 -
I want Dobson and Stockley sold on the same day (tomorrow). I will be on here and on Twitter with a massive bag of popcorn and a list of annoying comments I intend to make12
-
Ducktapeshoerepairs said:Serious question - what would Dobbo be worth in this market ? (I fear not a lot)0
-
NabySarr said:Ducktapeshoerepairs said:Serious question - what would Dobbo be worth in this market ? (I fear not a lot)4
-
can’t believe that some appear not to realise that every player has a price. Also, not every players ambition is to play for Charlton. One thing I’ve leant since supporting Charlton in 1972 is that we sell our best players, usually for less than they are actually worth. It’s also possible that if clubs were sniffing around GD, and at the moment all this is just based on @golfaddicks personal opinion and nothing else, then GD himself might want to move on. It happens. If that happened I wouldn’t consider him to be disrespectful to us just that if we sold him I wouldn’t consider that disrespectful to him. It’s football.
For what it’s worth I certainly don’t want him to go, he’d be the first name on my team sheet, but if BG decided it best for the team, that he could bring in three players as a result of GD going and that would make the team better overall then I’d accept that. He’d get pelters if it backfired though.8 -
cafcfan1990 said:CAFCDAZ said:North Lower Neil said:dicktracey said:1
-
Sponsored links:
-
Tbf @ValleyGary has seen the convo as I shared it with him, this hasn't come from the tea lady, let's put it that way.2
-
LargeAddick said:can’t believe that some appear not to realise that every player has a price. Also, not every players ambition is to play for Charlton. One thing I’ve leant since supporting Charlton in 1972 is that we sell our best players, usually for less than they are actually worth. It’s also possible that if clubs were sniffing around GD, and at the moment all this is just based on @golfaddicks personal opinion and nothing else, then GD himself might want to move on. It happens. If that happened I wouldn’t consider him to be disrespectful to us just that if we sold him I wouldn’t consider that disrespectful to him. It’s football.
For what it’s worth I certainly don’t want him to go, he’d be the first name on my team sheet, but if BG decided it best for the team, that he could bring in three players as a result of GD going and that would make the team better overall then I’d accept that. He’d get pelters if it backfired though.
He was a FREE last year....0 -
supaclive said:LargeAddick said:can’t believe that some appear not to realise that every player has a price. Also, not every players ambition is to play for Charlton. One thing I’ve leant since supporting Charlton in 1972 is that we sell our best players, usually for less than they are actually worth. It’s also possible that if clubs were sniffing around GD, and at the moment all this is just based on @golfaddicks personal opinion and nothing else, then GD himself might want to move on. It happens. If that happened I wouldn’t consider him to be disrespectful to us just that if we sold him I wouldn’t consider that disrespectful to him. It’s football.
For what it’s worth I certainly don’t want him to go, he’d be the first name on my team sheet, but if BG decided it best for the team, that he could bring in three players as a result of GD going and that would make the team better overall then I’d accept that. He’d get pelters if it backfired though.
He was a FREE last year....0 -
Jac_52 said:sammy391 said:It’ll either be
“Charlton trying for McKirdy arrival”
or
“leaburn has shown he’s capable of being 3rd choice”
even worse would be
“ *unknown* premier league striker set to sign for Charlton”
I'd actually prefer the last scenario.
Unknown premier league loans are my favourite genre of signing.1 -
supaclive said:LargeAddick said:can’t believe that some appear not to realise that every player has a price. Also, not every players ambition is to play for Charlton. One thing I’ve leant since supporting Charlton in 1972 is that we sell our best players, usually for less than they are actually worth. It’s also possible that if clubs were sniffing around GD, and at the moment all this is just based on @golfaddicks personal opinion and nothing else, then GD himself might want to move on. It happens. If that happened I wouldn’t consider him to be disrespectful to us just that if we sold him I wouldn’t consider that disrespectful to him. It’s football.
For what it’s worth I certainly don’t want him to go, he’d be the first name on my team sheet, but if BG decided it best for the team, that he could bring in three players as a result of GD going and that would make the team better overall then I’d accept that. He’d get pelters if it backfired though.
He was a FREE last year....1 -
CAFCDAZ said:Tbf @ValleyGary has seen the convo as I shared it with him, this hasn't come from the tea lady, let's put it that way.0
-
supaclive said:Garrymanilow said:supaclive said:Garrymanilow said:There's a lot of flap about Dobson based on no evidence so far but I'm fairly calm about whether he stays or goes. I do think he's a better passer of the ball than he's given credit for and I think he could play higher up the pitch if we're playing a deep-lying playmaker at the base of the midfield rather than a destroyer. Having said that though, if Garner has decided that he doesn't suit what he's going to do then in terms of a sale his stock will never be higher than it is now after winning POTY, and with our well-stocked midfield we could afford to move him on more than we can afford to go into the bulk of the season without another winger and another striker. Some players just don't suit how a manager wants to play, and if Dobson falls into that category and Garner feels we don't need him because we have McGrandles doing a similar but slightly different role, and we use the money from his sale to get in a goal-scoring winger and some competition for Stockley then I'm happy. The most viable strategy any team has these days is to get decent players in and sell them on at a profit to bring in more decent players. We got Dobson for nothing, if Garner doesn't play with a player like him and we sell him for cash then that's not necessarily a bad thing. If this is all smoke though then I'm sure he can play in front of a deeper midfielder and play well. We'll just have to see what happens.
I simply disagree
Dobson is better than McGrandles
Payne
Gilbey
Morgan
JFC
Fraser
He was our RUNAWAY player of the year.
Selling him because he's valuable is stupid economics if it makes us worse, which it will.
Come on now.
This is absurd. We need to strengthen. Not make the squad weaker4 -
supaclive said:NabySarr said:Athletico Charlton said:thenewbie said:supaclive said:Garrymanilow said:There's a lot of flap about Dobson based on no evidence so far but I'm fairly calm about whether he stays or goes. I do think he's a better passer of the ball than he's given credit for and I think he could play higher up the pitch if we're playing a deep-lying playmaker at the base of the midfield rather than a destroyer. Having said that though, if Garner has decided that he doesn't suit what he's going to do then in terms of a sale his stock will never be higher than it is now after winning POTY, and with our well-stocked midfield we could afford to move him on more than we can afford to go into the bulk of the season without another winger and another striker. Some players just don't suit how a manager wants to play, and if Dobson falls into that category and Garner feels we don't need him because we have McGrandles doing a similar but slightly different role, and we use the money from his sale to get in a goal-scoring winger and some competition for Stockley then I'm happy. The most viable strategy any team has these days is to get decent players in and sell them on at a profit to bring in more decent players. We got Dobson for nothing, if Garner doesn't play with a player like him and we sell him for cash then that's not necessarily a bad thing. If this is all smoke though then I'm sure he can play in front of a deeper midfielder and play well. We'll just have to see what happens.
I simply disagree
Dobson is better than McGrandles
Payne
Gilbey
Morgan
JFC
Fraser
He was our RUNAWAY player of the year.
Selling him because he's valuable is stupid economics if it makes us worse, which it will.
The only one of those players you can realistically compare him to is McGrandles as the others just don't play in the same way or position. Certainly he is much, much better than Fraser or Payne defensively but I doubt he would bring as much going forward so I can't get behind the idea he's objectively THAT much better.
Near enough every season since relegation from the PL we have sold our best player at the end of the year and fans on here have written what you have written. Every season it has failed which ultimately has led to something like 8-9 seasons in L1 and us establishing ourselves as a mid table team in the lower leagues.
Dobson should be in the team, no arguments. He is decent but won't command a fee of sufficient size to make a difference to us imo.
You don't sell your best players if you want to get promoted4 -
Looking forward to seeing if we can get a striker in the door this week.
Whoever signs now won't be starting at Accrington but it'd be nice to have an extra option off the bench, with five subs for each side.0 -
sam3110 said:But the argument is in a better team he wouldn't have to be mopping up and making so many tackles as he did, so would he stand out as much?
You need players like George Dobson even more in the way Garner wants to play to cover the two attacking full backs who will be in more advanced positions also to protect the CB's. McGrandles plays one half and he's better than consistent George !
You really couldn't make it up.
As the way Ben wants to play will need 16 players, Dobson and McGrandles will be needed over the 90+ minutes.
I will discuss the finer points of the way Garner wants to play on the Technical thread.
1 -
Sponsored links:
-
Clem_Snide said:The last few pages, encapsulate this site so well........poster makes random statement that Dobson could leave, that becomes fact within a couple of pages and subsequent pages spent debating said statement like it has already happened.
Dobson has a price, every player has a price. If he goes the world won't stop spinning. Last year he was a solid performer in what some on here viewed as the worst Charlton team they had ever seen. He is replaceable, and in McGrandles may already have been replaced.
IMO I don't think Garner will see him as first choice (happy to be proved wrong) and may want someone more mobile.
That's what I've heard, from a very good source. Garner doesn't rate Dobson that highly.
2 -
bobmunro said:Clem_Snide said:The last few pages, encapsulate this site so well........poster makes random statement that Dobson could leave, that becomes fact within a couple of pages and subsequent pages spent debating said statement like it has already happened.
Dobson has a price, every player has a price. If he goes the world won't stop spinning. Last year he was a solid performer in what some on here viewed as the worst Charlton team they had ever seen. He is replaceable, and in McGrandles may already have been replaced.
IMO I don't think Garner will see him as first choice (happy to be proved wrong) and may want someone more mobile.
That's what I've heard, from a very good source. Garner doesn't rate Dobson that highly.2 -
I think we need @ForeverAddickted ‘s match preview thread opened early this week for arguments over whether Dobson starts or not.1
-
supaclive said:thenewbie said:supaclive said:NabySarr said:Athletico Charlton said:thenewbie said:supaclive said:Garrymanilow said:There's a lot of flap about Dobson based on no evidence so far but I'm fairly calm about whether he stays or goes. I do think he's a better passer of the ball than he's given credit for and I think he could play higher up the pitch if we're playing a deep-lying playmaker at the base of the midfield rather than a destroyer. Having said that though, if Garner has decided that he doesn't suit what he's going to do then in terms of a sale his stock will never be higher than it is now after winning POTY, and with our well-stocked midfield we could afford to move him on more than we can afford to go into the bulk of the season without another winger and another striker. Some players just don't suit how a manager wants to play, and if Dobson falls into that category and Garner feels we don't need him because we have McGrandles doing a similar but slightly different role, and we use the money from his sale to get in a goal-scoring winger and some competition for Stockley then I'm happy. The most viable strategy any team has these days is to get decent players in and sell them on at a profit to bring in more decent players. We got Dobson for nothing, if Garner doesn't play with a player like him and we sell him for cash then that's not necessarily a bad thing. If this is all smoke though then I'm sure he can play in front of a deeper midfielder and play well. We'll just have to see what happens.
I simply disagree
Dobson is better than McGrandles
Payne
Gilbey
Morgan
JFC
Fraser
He was our RUNAWAY player of the year.
Selling him because he's valuable is stupid economics if it makes us worse, which it will.
The only one of those players you can realistically compare him to is McGrandles as the others just don't play in the same way or position. Certainly he is much, much better than Fraser or Payne defensively but I doubt he would bring as much going forward so I can't get behind the idea he's objectively THAT much better.
Near enough every season since relegation from the PL we have sold our best player at the end of the year and fans on here have written what you have written. Every season it has failed which ultimately has led to something like 8-9 seasons in L1 and us establishing ourselves as a mid table team in the lower leagues.
Dobson should be in the team, no arguments. He is decent but won't command a fee of sufficient size to make a difference to us imo.
You don't sell your best players if you want to get promoted
Don't do down the job he did
He was our best player by miles!6 -
Dobson wasn't rated by many on here last season.
Same with Clare.
Both got dropped, both got back in the side later on and both showed their worth.
Different managers, different styles but also different situations.
As the season progresses different players will come to the fore as others lose form, get injured or leave.
WIOTOS6 -
sillav nitram said:Can’t believe we’re still talking about Dobbo!
FFS have none of you got lives?
4 -
bobmunro said:Clem_Snide said:The last few pages, encapsulate this site so well........poster makes random statement that Dobson could leave, that becomes fact within a couple of pages and subsequent pages spent debating said statement like it has already happened.
Dobson has a price, every player has a price. If he goes the world won't stop spinning. Last year he was a solid performer in what some on here viewed as the worst Charlton team they had ever seen. He is replaceable, and in McGrandles may already have been replaced.
IMO I don't think Garner will see him as first choice (happy to be proved wrong) and may want someone more mobile.
That's what I've heard, from a very good source. Garner doesn't rate Dobson that highly.0 -
sillav nitram said:Can’t believe we’re still talking about Dobbo!
FFS have none of you got lives?
No Martin, we are Charlton fan/critics, we have no lives but we care desperately about our team which means so much to us and that's why we argue the toss.
You are not keen on tangents so I will go over to the other thread; I may be back as I'm a rebel with a cause.
.....................
Left footed, Left back with pace who can cross a ball from an advanced position or do the dummy run on occasions to help the one trick pony Charlie Kirk out when he goes on to his favoured right foot or to combine well with Fraser, CBT etc on the left side.
The isn't the Pope a Catholic moment: Charlton need a forward who is really good on the ground and has a good first touch which either puts the ball in the net or controls the ball. This guy won't be a giant but will have pace and can play in and around the box and drift wide when necessary.
Football should be controlled passion when you remember that players are someone's family and would you want your son or Daughter getting abuse when they are working ?
3 -
bobmunro said:Clem_Snide said:The last few pages, encapsulate this site so well........poster makes random statement that Dobson could leave, that becomes fact within a couple of pages and subsequent pages spent debating said statement like it has already happened.
Dobson has a price, every player has a price. If he goes the world won't stop spinning. Last year he was a solid performer in what some on here viewed as the worst Charlton team they had ever seen. He is replaceable, and in McGrandles may already have been replaced.
IMO I don't think Garner will see him as first choice (happy to be proved wrong) and may want someone more mobile.
That's what I've heard, from a very good source. Garner doesn't rate Dobson that highly.6 -
Todds_right_hook said:supaclive said:NabySarr said:Athletico Charlton said:thenewbie said:supaclive said:Garrymanilow said:There's a lot of flap about Dobson based on no evidence so far but I'm fairly calm about whether he stays or goes. I do think he's a better passer of the ball than he's given credit for and I think he could play higher up the pitch if we're playing a deep-lying playmaker at the base of the midfield rather than a destroyer. Having said that though, if Garner has decided that he doesn't suit what he's going to do then in terms of a sale his stock will never be higher than it is now after winning POTY, and with our well-stocked midfield we could afford to move him on more than we can afford to go into the bulk of the season without another winger and another striker. Some players just don't suit how a manager wants to play, and if Dobson falls into that category and Garner feels we don't need him because we have McGrandles doing a similar but slightly different role, and we use the money from his sale to get in a goal-scoring winger and some competition for Stockley then I'm happy. The most viable strategy any team has these days is to get decent players in and sell them on at a profit to bring in more decent players. We got Dobson for nothing, if Garner doesn't play with a player like him and we sell him for cash then that's not necessarily a bad thing. If this is all smoke though then I'm sure he can play in front of a deeper midfielder and play well. We'll just have to see what happens.
I simply disagree
Dobson is better than McGrandles
Payne
Gilbey
Morgan
JFC
Fraser
He was our RUNAWAY player of the year.
Selling him because he's valuable is stupid economics if it makes us worse, which it will.
The only one of those players you can realistically compare him to is McGrandles as the others just don't play in the same way or position. Certainly he is much, much better than Fraser or Payne defensively but I doubt he would bring as much going forward so I can't get behind the idea he's objectively THAT much better.
Near enough every season since relegation from the PL we have sold our best player at the end of the year and fans on here have written what you have written. Every season it has failed which ultimately has led to something like 8-9 seasons in L1 and us establishing ourselves as a mid table team in the lower leagues.
Dobson should be in the team, no arguments. He is decent but won't command a fee of sufficient size to make a difference to us imo.
You don't sell your best players if you want to get promoted
Carl Jenkinson was a good young player with potential who had started his career well and similar to the Mason Burstow situation but wasn't George Dobson who had at last found a club he could influence and won the POTY by a country mile and GB can play in numerous midfield positions and be excellent in a good team around him.
All speculation but a pattern is emerging.
2