Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

God Save Our Queen - Funeral will be Mon 19th September (p26)

17810121350

Comments

  • would it really be though? it might seem like that in the UK, but it's not going to have any real impact anywhere else. Not really going to have any impact here either
    Well there will be a mourning period, would they postpone all football/sport/events this weekend?
  • There are 2.4 billion people in the Commonwealth it will have a huge affect, not least the question of Monarchy its self.
     
  • When numbers 2 to 10 in the pecking order travel to Balmoral when it's not the Queen's Birthday or Xmas it doesn't take a Royal reporter to work out what occuring.
  • Watching the news now and if she has sadly departed then i hope they manage to release another 'final' photo of her. Seems a bit of a piss take that if after everything she did in her life, the final photo of her in existence is with Liz Truss!
  • If she has already died, why would there be a delay in the announcement? What would be the benefit in not releasing the statement straight away? 
  • If she has already died, why would there be a delay in the announcement? What would be the benefit in not releasing the statement straight away? 
    I believe there's a set process on who gets told and in what order. 

    The population is told last of course. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Watching the news now and if she has sadly departed then i hope they manage to release another 'final' photo of her. Seems a bit of a piss take that if after everything she did in her life, the final photo of her in existence is with Liz Truss!
    What a weird post.🤨
  • Watching the news now and if she has sadly departed then i hope they manage to release another 'final' photo of her. Seems a bit of a piss take that if after everything she did in her life, the final photo of her in existence is with Liz Truss!

    Eh?
  • If she has already died, why would there be a delay in the announcement? What would be the benefit in not releasing the statement straight away? 
    There must be a process and set protocol's for this i guess.
  • Watching the news now and if she has sadly departed then i hope they manage to release another 'final' photo of her. Seems a bit of a piss take that if after everything she did in her life, the final photo of her in existence is with Liz Truss!
    Her first Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill - her last Liz Truss. Doesn't square any circle, does it?
  • To provide containment for the likely public response?
    Absolutely. They would also want to wait for the whole family to be there before it is announced. 
  • Nicholas Witchell was speaking and stuttered halfway through just now - and frankly sounded like he was about to start crying. His whole voice changed halfway through a question..... Its like something had just come through to him.
  • liz truss 28 years ago as a student was slamming the monarchy, it doesn't sit right that the last possible photo of her is of them together
  • I suspect that the delay in any announcement is also to allow those members of the Royal family travelling to Balmoral to actually get there before they do so.
  • I believe there's a set process on who gets told and in what order. 

    The population is told last of course. 
    Makes sense, thanks.
  • Personally think it’s bad taste, tell us when it’s happened. Do we really need a kind of pre event warm up. I really don’t think so…….. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Personally think it’s bad taste, tell us when it’s happened. Do we really need a kind of pre event warm up. I really don’t think so…….. 
    I presume the Queen herself has approved the plans, so I would prefer that her wishes were followed when she does pass away. 

    Better that than it being “leaked” by some hack on social media. 
  • liz truss 28 years ago as a student was slamming the monarchy, it doesn't sit right that the last possible photo of her is of them together
    Perhaps the opposite? The head of a parliamentary democracy is the head of state of all. It demonstrates the strength of a democracy that someone who is opposed to the principle is nevertheless bound by the democratic principle.  
  • Perhaps the opposite? The head of a parliamentary democracy is the head of state of all. It demonstrates the strength of a democracy that someone who is opposed to the principle is nevertheless bound by the democratic principle.  
    not for me ta 
  • edited September 2022
    Personally think it’s bad taste, tell us when it’s happened. Do we really need a kind of pre event warm up. I really don’t think so…….. 
    Fortunately the Monarchy is not bound by "taste", but by duty, principle and protocol. 
  • Come on. She may be our queen but she also has a family who should be the first to know. We don't need to know when it's happened.
    I’m sure they have phones and other means of communication. I’m sure if a family member is on a plane an hour away, they would not wait until they arrived to tell them. 
  • I’m sure they have phones and other means of communication. I’m sure if a family member is on a plane an hour away, they would not wait until they arrived to tell them. 
    I would guess they'd tell them but they'd be waiting for their arrival before any official statement was made
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!