Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Sandgaard ownership discussion 2022-3 onwards (Meeting with CAST p138)

1154155157159160170

Comments

  • cabbles said:
    Be curious to see the level of unrest/frustration outside of this site if he’s at the game 
    I'll be there and hope people make it clear how bad this all is. 
  • To be fair most of the youth would probably rather listen to that than Sandgaard's song.

    Might even wake the east stand up!
  • Thought he was going to Back to The Valley evening, that’s why I said everyone under one roof.
  • Thought he was going to Back to The Valley evening, that’s why I said everyone under one roof.
    Hopefully for everyone attending the evening, he does not get his Banjo out 
  • Prague 
    That's rather harsh, maybe I overdid it a bit but honestly , it doesn't matter where you sit in an organization, if you can't persuade your boss that something is completely idiotic when it obviously is without 'testing' it first that is disappointing at best ! 
    I chair quite a few businesses and when/ if I come up with stupid ideas the 'little people' ( which btw is a pretty derogatory term that I wouldn't consider using) aka the people who actually do the work generally tell me quite promptly !
    Surely that all depends on how your boss is going to react? If you have questioned them before on other issues and their response has been to pooh pooh it, and we all know how it’s Sandgaard’s way or no way, then you are unlikely to bother next time you feel something should be said because you know you are hitting your head against a brick wall.
  • Shouldn't that be on the sexual innuendo thread ? 
    You have a very dirty mind young lady.
  • I expect there will be the usual fawning from the usual people. 
    Who is being alluded to?
  • Sponsored links:


  • I expect there will be the usual fawning from the usual people. 

  • NabySarr said:
    Is he desperate to offload? That’s an assumption. If he wanted out I don’t know why he wouldn’t just say so to avoid any grief. Even if he is looking for a way out I think he would need pressure put on him to drop his probably deluded asking price so protests would still be necessary
    Did protests make Roland drop his price then ?
  • Thought he was going to Back to The Valley evening, that’s why I said everyone under one roof.
    Unfortunately he couldn’t afford the ridiculous £96 ticket price and after the Southall & co fleecing, he can’t put it on the company card and write it off as a tax offset like most others going :-) 
  • Bailey said:
    Did protests make Roland drop his price then ?
    I’m confident if protests were directed towards TS he would sell up. 
  • J BLOCK said:
    I’m confident if protests were directed towards TS he would sell up. 
    He hasn’t got anything to sell other than players 
  • edited November 2022
    He hasn’t got anything to sell other than players 
    Don’t forget the Golden Share membership of the EFL mate for what it’s worth 😉.
  • bobmunro said:
    Indeed - any non-compete clause would have to state clearly the nature of that 'competition'. CAFC is not in competition with heating and ventilation suppliers for example, or kit manufacturers.

    He can put whatever he likes into a contract change, but firstly the employees have to agree with that change and secondly even if they do it would be dead in the water if he ever thought about suing them (absolute madness for him to even think that would be doable). 
    Hiya Bob, my information is…… staff are well aware the law is on their side, but they are also well aware of the methods used if they refuse to sign
  • I believe that to enforce a non compete clause, the club would be required to take out a retrospective injunction once the said employee had started work for the new company that is "competing" with Charlton.

    I can't envisage any role at the club where a non compete would be relevant.  

    And how could a non compete work if you had been sacked or made redundant? "We are getting rid of you, but we will stop you working for someone else". I can see that being laughed out of court (not that it would ever get there).

    It looks like Tommy boys solicitors are no longer at the Freshfields level!
    I don't think this is anything to do with competing with Charlton, it's more likely the case that having sacked/"made someone redundant" they don't want to see that person roll up to the Valley on Monday morning working for someone else which is I think what happened with Dan ? Sandgaard probably wasn't singing a happy song after that  :D:D:D
  • Sponsored links:


  • Just seen a twitter exchange with Peter Varney about an hour ago. Someone asked him if he was able to help shape the future, his response was 'that would be for other to decide!'. Cryptic comment or wishful thinking???
  • So is this clause being added just as a housekeeping type thing or under some other explanation?

    Whilst easy to comment when not personally impacted I hope it can taken as a non issue on a practical level for most. 

    If you were concerned about not being able to join another company who are a sponsor / supplier wouldn’t you just resign and join them anyway if that offer existed today?

    Presumably they can’t introduce the clause against your will without some sort of severance if it’s a red line for anyone. But maybe they can?

    To play devils advocate is the explanation actually it’s genuinely only a housekeeping tidy up on contracts that didn’t exist before and simplifies / harmonises for all?  Only some  more senior staff would practically see this  clause try to be invoked i.e. those with a longer notice period and then it’s a negotiation point between you and your prospective new employer isn’t it?

    but as I understand the club don’t pay very well it’s hard to see anyone not jumping ship if they had a genuine opportunity with a sponsor for example. 
  • Just seen a twitter exchange with Peter Varney about an hour ago. Someone asked him if he was able to help shape the future, his response was 'that would be for other to decide!'. Cryptic comment or wishful thinking???
    Saw him in the West stand on Saturday.
  • How many people who don't work for the club work at the Valley?  Are we subletting offices out to sponsors or something?
  • Cafc43v3r said:
    How many people who don't work for the club work at the Valley?  Are we subletting offices out to sponsors or something?
    District Nurses
  • J BLOCK said:
    I’m confident if protests were directed towards TS he would sell up. 
    Confidence comes from knowledge, so what is the basis of your confidence J Block ?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!