Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Sandgaard Out! - massive secondhand embarrassment warning for p7.
Comments
-
He flashed his veneer Gnashers she bounced over and told me it is good I looked at her tits and licked my lips after that its all a dreamTodds_right_hook said:
What response did you get back?bertpalmer said:Just glad i told both him and his Mrs to there faces how shit his addicts to victory song is at the night with curbs do last year23 -
I can’t work out if that’s part of the song?11
-
I fail to see the point in employing a manager and then not giving them the time and budget to execute a plan. This has seemingly happened twice in a row, and indicates this owner is out if his depth. In both experience of running a club and financially.
0 -
"Indicate" is, IMO, an extremely kind word to use in this context.....fenlandaddick said:I fail to see the point in employing a manager and then not giving them the time and budget to execute a plan. This has seemingly happened twice in a row, and indicates this owner is out if his depth. In both experience of running a club and financially.0 -
Thats appalling to treat staff like that.T_C_E said:For every defence of the owner, I’ll bring to the table a phone call, a email or text from an ex or current employee that’s been humiliated, belittled, intimidated or bullied under his ownership.1 -
He doesn't care about the staff. He doesn't care about the team. He doesn't care about his long term involvement in the business. He wants out and he thinks he should get a premium for the monies he's "invested" (wasted) on Senior management hires, managers, players and everything else.
He has confirmed he is stubborn. I would use arrogant and ignorant. He will ultimately leave with his tail between his legs, sporting a massive loss.
But when. That is the ultimate question.20 -
I agree, whether it was a few weeks or a few months that would be the direction of travel.golfaddick said:Out of interest, what do you think would have happened if TS hadn't have bought us in September 2020. Everyone says he was our saviour & rightly thank him for it, but say he didnt buy us or the court case went against him & ESI were still the owners 2 years ago.
Personally I don't think ESI mk 2 would have ended up as owners. I'm pretty sure the EFL would have blocked Farnell as not being able to pass the "fit & proper" test and Southall was on his last legs anyway, ownership wise.
Would it have been Administration ? Elliott with a mystery backer (Farnell & Co) ? Or would somebody else have stepped in ?
My money is on Administration.....not immediately, but sometime into the New Year after limping along for a few months with funds dwindling & players not getting paid.
"Out with TS"- well what next? who's going to pay the bills? TS can sell for £1 to another Southall Mk 2.And we can guess where that might lead.
If there is a fan on this site who can afford a club.... time to step forward.
To the rest of us lets think of some constructive way out of this. I hope CAST can come up with some more ideas.
For me making CAFC look an attractive proposition is one way to go...by supporting the team6 -
It would be nice if he could f**k off sharpish so we can try and avoid relegation.supaclive said:He doesn't care about the staff. He doesn't care about the team. He doesn't care about his long term involvement in the business. He wants out and he thinks he should get a premium for the monies he's "invested" (wasted) on Senior management hires, managers, players and everything else.
He has confirmed he is stubborn. I would use arrogant and ignorant. He will ultimately leave with his tail between his legs, sporting a massive loss.
But when. That is the ultimate question.
I'm not holding my breath though, and realistically this really doesn't look or sound good.1 -
Charlton Supporters are in a Catch 22 position with Thomas Sandgaard. Since the holiday romance is heading for divorce, what is stopping him just getting rid to another Southall/Elliott type of operation who may just be more interested in our academy similar to Crewe Alexander under Dario Gradi who got a fee allegedly every time the likes of Murphy, Ashton, Johnston, were sold. Yo-yoing between league 1+2 as they were a factory farm for young players.
Could definitely see a consortium of Scouts, ex players, and coaches who have made money from youth players putting in a bid because they are only interested in having control of the only assets that TS owns which is the players and most importantly the young players who have any worth.
They are not interested in the stadium or Sparrows unless they were going for a song which obviously they are not under Roland Duchatelet's tenure.
We are revisiting Woolwich metaphorically speaking, on another freezing night with even less chance of getting anywhere. Those guys on the ground floor back in the day in Woolwich who said they would rather be in League 2 with a decent owner/owners may still get their wish if it isn't already too late for a decent owner ?
Hadn't read @KingKinsella fine words before posting but the Siberian Woolwich experience in black and white revisited my memory.2 -
It's the Thomas Sandgaard "Charlton persona", the same PR freight train one that he burst onto the scene all of twitter with.
Plenty of people called him a bellend then, even more so now. Not liking the fella much and thinking he was/wasn't a bad owner weren't one of the same but certain people decided it was. All the twitter guff, the behind the scenes goings-on (sackings, treatment, rumours etc) has always been there, except from last summer to october there was an obvious bad guy to blame because unlike Tom, evil genius Ged Roddy didn't introduce himself by wanking off Charlton fans left right and centre and was stuck in a role he didn't suit, so every time Sandgaard did one of his weekly SLP interviews or whatever it was always "Ged Roddy's told him to say that" (high press, players that don't chase the long ball bla bla bla)
Oh yeah, where's my 8 million, stop hounding the man, etc etc0 -
Sponsored links:
-
+1 Internet point for you for calling it before othersCL_Phantom said:It's the Thomas Sandgaard "Charlton persona", the same PR freight train one that he burst onto the scene all of twitter with.
Plenty of people called him a bellend then, even more so now. Not liking the fella much and thinking he was/wasn't a bad owner weren't one of the same but certain people decided it was. All the twitter guff, the behind the scenes goings-on (sackings, treatment, rumours etc) has always been there, except from last summer to october there was an obvious bad guy to blame because unlike Tom, evil genius Ged Roddy didn't introduce himself by wanking off Charlton fans left right and centre and was stuck in a role he didn't suit, so every time Sandgaard did one of his weekly SLP interviews or whatever it was always "Ged Roddy's told him to say that" (high press, players that don't chase the long ball bla bla bla)
Oh yeah, where's my 8 million, stop hounding the man, etc etc1 -
3
-
I didn't find him annoying at all. I had the video on silent.Covered End said:2 -
Even better if you'd worn a blindfold.KiwiValley said:
I didn't find him annoying at all. I had the video on silent.Covered End said:2 -
Ged Roddy wrote the EPPP regulation which helped to further destroy the academies specifically of clubs like ours and Crewe by giving no recognition of the many years of incredible work we did but push entirely towards wealthier teams. He didn't even index link the payments the lower league teams receive. He wasn't an evil genius, he was a nob.CL_Phantom said:It's the Thomas Sandgaard "Charlton persona", the same PR freight train one that he burst onto the scene all of twitter with.
Plenty of people called him a bellend then, even more so now. Not liking the fella much and thinking he was/wasn't a bad owner weren't one of the same but certain people decided it was. All the twitter guff, the behind the scenes goings-on (sackings, treatment, rumours etc) has always been there, except from last summer to october there was an obvious bad guy to blame because unlike Tom, evil genius Ged Roddy didn't introduce himself by wanking off Charlton fans left right and centre and was stuck in a role he didn't suit, so every time Sandgaard did one of his weekly SLP interviews or whatever it was always "Ged Roddy's told him to say that" (high press, players that don't chase the long ball bla bla bla)
Oh yeah, where's my 8 million, stop hounding the man, etc etc4 -
Covered End said:Jesus H Christ what a tit.You can bet all the arse lickers rush out and start clapping along. Promotion isn't based on ability but how much head banging you do. FFS0
-
AND banjo banging ?Arsenetatters said:Covered End said:Jesus H Christ what a tit.You can bet all the arse lickers rush out and start clapping along. Promotion isn't based on ability but how much head banging you do. FFS0 -
7
-
1 -
Didn't think to try that!Fanny Fanackapan said:
Even better if you'd worn a blindfold.KiwiValley said:
I didn't find him annoying at all. I had the video on silent.Covered End said:0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Addicks to Victory. It's not available on DVD/cassette/12' vinyl/minidisk is it? Because if it is I am burning my Christmas tree down with all the presents around it, just to be safe!2
-
It’s a good question. But I could question the same about many people on the Charlton scene who’ve put a hell of a lot less money (real or comparative) into the running of our club.Airman Brown said:Athletico Charlton said:
He sticks £6-8M into the club a year keeping it going. If he wants to do a stylised photoshoot supporting the team it really doesn't matter.Airman Brown said:
Why is the owner doing a stylised photoshoot in the shirt in the first place?Solidgone said:I think there are some nasty comments on here about TS in this video clip. The guy is obviously being directed by the photographer to get the right photograph. I’m sure if you saw similar videos of other photo shoots by models there would be some similarity with awkward poses, although a lot more prettier 🥸
You moaned at RD for showing no passion, now an owner can show too much passion.
Don't get me wrong TS has run his course and make bad choices but as fans we do moan about the strangest things.
Is the passion here for Charlton or himself?Sandgaard’s ego is clear and not up for debate (though I strongly think it masks insecurities and a more introverted personality than most imagine).If we were doing ok then his quirkiness and public displays would be a tolerated, if we were doing well and outperforming they’d be smiled at and probably encouraged. But we’re not, the opposite. And as such they just look embarrassing.I’m confident we won’t be seeing them again though.17 -
Or the man himself ?AFKABartram said:
It’s a good question. But I could question the same about many people on the Charlton scene who’ve put a hell of a lot less money (real or comparative) into the running of our club.Airman Brown said:Athletico Charlton said:
He sticks £6-8M into the club a year keeping it going. If he wants to do a stylised photoshoot supporting the team it really doesn't matter.Airman Brown said:
Why is the owner doing a stylised photoshoot in the shirt in the first place?Solidgone said:I think there are some nasty comments on here about TS in this video clip. The guy is obviously being directed by the photographer to get the right photograph. I’m sure if you saw similar videos of other photo shoots by models there would be some similarity with awkward poses, although a lot more prettier 🥸
You moaned at RD for showing no passion, now an owner can show too much passion.
Don't get me wrong TS has run his course and make bad choices but as fans we do moan about the strangest things.
Is the passion here for Charlton or himself?Sandgaard’s ego is clear and not up for debate (though I strongly think it masks insecurities and a more introverted personality than most imagine).If we were doing ok then his quirkiness and public displays would be a tolerated, if we were doing well and outperforming they’d be smiled at and probably encouraged. But we’re not, the opposite. And as such they just look embarrassing.I’m confident we won’t be seeing them again though.0 -
I met him in the pub once and got chatting one on one for a little bit. Whilst he was very polite and willing to chat I also got the impression that there’s a shyness there which was quite surprising at the time.AFKABartram said:
It’s a good question. But I could question the same about many people on the Charlton scene who’ve put a hell of a lot less money (real or comparative) into the running of our club.Airman Brown said:Athletico Charlton said:
He sticks £6-8M into the club a year keeping it going. If he wants to do a stylised photoshoot supporting the team it really doesn't matter.Airman Brown said:
Why is the owner doing a stylised photoshoot in the shirt in the first place?Solidgone said:I think there are some nasty comments on here about TS in this video clip. The guy is obviously being directed by the photographer to get the right photograph. I’m sure if you saw similar videos of other photo shoots by models there would be some similarity with awkward poses, although a lot more prettier 🥸
You moaned at RD for showing no passion, now an owner can show too much passion.
Don't get me wrong TS has run his course and make bad choices but as fans we do moan about the strangest things.
Is the passion here for Charlton or himself?Sandgaard’s ego is clear and not up for debate (though I strongly think it masks insecurities and a more introverted personality than most imagine).If we were doing ok then his quirkiness and public displays would be a tolerated, if we were doing well and outperforming they’d be smiled at and probably encouraged. But we’re not, the opposite. And as such they just look embarrassing.I’m confident we won’t be seeing them again though.1 -
If he's an insecure introvert going through a mid life crises then that's not as bad.
He does need to apply for a Britain's got talent audition though. Use the Charlton problem as a sob story, promote himself, sell the club to someone who can afford the valley
1 -
cafctom said:
I met him in the pub once and got chatting one on one for a little bit. Whilst he was very polite and willing to chat I also got the impression that there’s a shyness there which was quite surprising at the time.AFKABartram said:
It’s a good question. But I could question the same about many people on the Charlton scene who’ve put a hell of a lot less money (real or comparative) into the running of our club.Airman Brown said:Athletico Charlton said:
He sticks £6-8M into the club a year keeping it going. If he wants to do a stylised photoshoot supporting the team it really doesn't matter.Airman Brown said:
Why is the owner doing a stylised photoshoot in the shirt in the first place?Solidgone said:I think there are some nasty comments on here about TS in this video clip. The guy is obviously being directed by the photographer to get the right photograph. I’m sure if you saw similar videos of other photo shoots by models there would be some similarity with awkward poses, although a lot more prettier 🥸
You moaned at RD for showing no passion, now an owner can show too much passion.
Don't get me wrong TS has run his course and make bad choices but as fans we do moan about the strangest things.
Is the passion here for Charlton or himself?Sandgaard’s ego is clear and not up for debate (though I strongly think it masks insecurities and a more introverted personality than most imagine).If we were doing ok then his quirkiness and public displays would be a tolerated, if we were doing well and outperforming they’d be smiled at and probably encouraged. But we’re not, the opposite. And as such they just look embarrassing.I’m confident we won’t be seeing them again though.
Maybe his missus has all the front?
1 -
She definitely doesfenlandaddick said:cafctom said:
I met him in the pub once and got chatting one on one for a little bit. Whilst he was very polite and willing to chat I also got the impression that there’s a shyness there which was quite surprising at the time.AFKABartram said:
It’s a good question. But I could question the same about many people on the Charlton scene who’ve put a hell of a lot less money (real or comparative) into the running of our club.Airman Brown said:Athletico Charlton said:
He sticks £6-8M into the club a year keeping it going. If he wants to do a stylised photoshoot supporting the team it really doesn't matter.Airman Brown said:
Why is the owner doing a stylised photoshoot in the shirt in the first place?Solidgone said:I think there are some nasty comments on here about TS in this video clip. The guy is obviously being directed by the photographer to get the right photograph. I’m sure if you saw similar videos of other photo shoots by models there would be some similarity with awkward poses, although a lot more prettier 🥸
You moaned at RD for showing no passion, now an owner can show too much passion.
Don't get me wrong TS has run his course and make bad choices but as fans we do moan about the strangest things.
Is the passion here for Charlton or himself?Sandgaard’s ego is clear and not up for debate (though I strongly think it masks insecurities and a more introverted personality than most imagine).If we were doing ok then his quirkiness and public displays would be a tolerated, if we were doing well and outperforming they’d be smiled at and probably encouraged. But we’re not, the opposite. And as such they just look embarrassing.I’m confident we won’t be seeing them again though.
Maybe his missus has all the front?
1 -
tangoflash said:
She definitely doesfenlandaddick said:cafctom said:
I met him in the pub once and got chatting one on one for a little bit. Whilst he was very polite and willing to chat I also got the impression that there’s a shyness there which was quite surprising at the time.AFKABartram said:
It’s a good question. But I could question the same about many people on the Charlton scene who’ve put a hell of a lot less money (real or comparative) into the running of our club.Airman Brown said:Athletico Charlton said:
He sticks £6-8M into the club a year keeping it going. If he wants to do a stylised photoshoot supporting the team it really doesn't matter.Airman Brown said:
Why is the owner doing a stylised photoshoot in the shirt in the first place?Solidgone said:I think there are some nasty comments on here about TS in this video clip. The guy is obviously being directed by the photographer to get the right photograph. I’m sure if you saw similar videos of other photo shoots by models there would be some similarity with awkward poses, although a lot more prettier 🥸
You moaned at RD for showing no passion, now an owner can show too much passion.
Don't get me wrong TS has run his course and make bad choices but as fans we do moan about the strangest things.
Is the passion here for Charlton or himself?Sandgaard’s ego is clear and not up for debate (though I strongly think it masks insecurities and a more introverted personality than most imagine).If we were doing ok then his quirkiness and public displays would be a tolerated, if we were doing well and outperforming they’d be smiled at and probably encouraged. But we’re not, the opposite. And as such they just look embarrassing.I’m confident we won’t be seeing them again though.
Maybe his missus has all the front?
Are you saying she is also a flirt?0 -
.
0 -
Doesn't sound like a clean-sheet dream though.bertpalmer said:
He flashed his veneer Gnashers she bounced over and told me it is good I looked at her tits and licked my lips after that its all a dreamTodds_right_hook said:
What response did you get back?bertpalmer said:Just glad i told both him and his Mrs to there faces how shit his addicts to victory song is at the night with curbs do last year1
