Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Kent Cricket 2024
Comments
-
Finch is opening instead of Compton0
-
Compton has a sore neck but will bat later. At least Finch hasn't had to do something strenuous like keep wicket for 114 overs1
-
Stationing myself behind the sofa for the remainder of today's play, dancing shoes securely laced for the duration.1
-
That went well.....
Concentrate on your central contract, Zak.1 -
Crawley caught Foakes bowled Worrall 41
-
DBD bowled Worrall 10
38-21 -
Finch gone now1
-
I love seeing new comments when we’re bowling… less so when batting ffs.0
-
Good job we bat to 11........3
-
76-3 Denly and Leaning in. Doesn't look good for Kent avoiding defeat.
Fanny dance away!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 - Sponsored links:
-
Denly out for 38 - chipped a ball from Steel to Lawrence at short midwicket. The brick wall is in now though.
97-40 -
Leaning caught in the slips by Sibley off Worrall for 24
102-50 -
120-5 at close, needing another 179 to avoid an innings defeat0
-
How many we gonna set them…..1
-
Chinese torture but we are currently 159-6 and 140 runs behind. The man to go was Compton - caught by Foakes off the bowling of Worrall0
-
Will it last until lunch?0
-
Clutching at straws here but maybe better to have our strongest side available for games we might have a chance of winning ?2
-
0
-
SSHHHHHHHHBriston_Addick said:
1 -
Please note that I'm making no comment about lasting until tea ...killerandflash said:
SSHHHHHHHHBriston_Addick said:1 - Sponsored links:
-
One of the three sessions negotiated
203-6 at lunch and 76 runs behind
Evison 44* (112)
Parkinson 25* (98)0 -
50 for Evison1
-
And gone. Trying to cut a ball from Lawes for 53 (120)
213-7 and 86 behind0 -
Ditto !!!!Briston_Addick said:
Please note that I'm making no comment about lasting until tea ...killerandflash said:
SSHHHHHHHHBriston_Addick said:
Daren't utter a word of positivity.1 -
I'm saying nothing now.Fanny Fanackapan said:
Ditto !!!!Briston_Addick said:
Please note that I'm making no comment about lasting until tea ...killerandflash said:
SSHHHHHHHHBriston_Addick said:
Daren't utter a word of positivity.
Other than ...
Time for Dancing Queen Fanny to get her wellies on!0 -
FECK FECK FECK !!!!!Fanny Fanackapan said:
Ditto !!!!Briston_Addick said:
Please note that I'm making no comment about lasting until tea ...killerandflash said:
SSHHHHHHHHBriston_Addick said:
Daren't utter a word of positivity.
Fanny 's fault....mea culpa.
0 -
Evison for Kent:
Innings - 22
Runs - 765
HS - 99
Average - 34.77
That average is comparable to most of our batsmen but is actually more impressive than at face value - one because it isn't skewed by one massive innings and two because of the number of times that he has got out putting bat to ball as he has run out of partners. So, once Crawley does disappear again and given that Muyeye's technique does not stand up to scrutiny, the fact that none of DBD, Leaning and Denly want to open, is there an argument for him to be given the chance to do so? It would also mean that Muyeye can play his natural game at 7.1 -
Garrett LBW Steel 5 (15)
226-8 and still another 73 required to make Surrey bat again0 -
He's very much a batting all rounder, so not the worst alternative.Addick Addict said:Evison for Kent:
Innings - 22
Runs - 765
HS - 99
Average - 34.77
That average is comparable to most of our batsmen but is actually more impressive than at face value - one because it isn't skewed by one massive innings and two because of the number of times that he has got out putting bat to ball as he has run out of partners. So, once Crawley does disappear again and given that Muyeye's technique does not stand up to scrutiny, the fact that none of DBD, Leaning and Denly want to open, is there an argument for him to be given the chance to do so?0 -
We could just save everyone a lot of time and effort (OK, not much effort)by starting our innings at, say 100-5, and just letting the tail bat.Addick Addict said:Evison for Kent:
Innings - 22
Runs - 765
HS - 99
Average - 34.77
That average is comparable to most of our batsmen but is actually more impressive than at face value - one because it isn't skewed by one massive innings and two because of the number of times that he has got out putting bat to ball as he has run out of partners. So, once Crawley does disappear again and given that Muyeye's technique does not stand up to scrutiny, the fact that none of DBD, Leaning and Denly want to open, is there an argument for him to be given the chance to do so?1
