Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Kent Cricket 2024
Comments
-
Kent now lead by 1! Crawley 230*1
-
378-2 D B-D lbw b Leach 62. O'Riordan next man in.1
-
Kent effectively 2-21
-
384-3 O'Riordan lbw b Leach 4.
Is middle and off the best guard?1 -
Crawley gone for 238. 399-4.1
-
Crawley c Rew b Pretorius 2381
-
Gilchrist in as nightwatchman.0
-
400 up: 403-41
-
409-5 Gilchrist b Pretorius 8
409-5 at the close as this was the last over and they went off at the fall of the wicket leaving 2 balls unbowled.1 -
Down to Denly to hold it together tomorrow. We need to bat as long as possible to avoid defeat. We are only 33 ahead so effectively 33-5.4
- Sponsored links:
-
378-1 to 409-5 has just about killed us3
-
A rather pathetic 178 all out killed us in fairness!Totally inexcusable.Our results aren’t even that horrendous - it’s the shocking first innings efforts with both bat and ball that have left us where we are in the table.7
-
Question - How can optimism crash into pessimism in such a short space of time ?
Answer - Ask Charlton & Kent supporters.
10 -
Great contributions from Crawley, Compton, DBD and Denly today. A hugely enjoyable day (especially compared to Friday) even allowing for the final hour. When Zak plays like that hard to think of anyone I'd rather be watching3
-
As it turned out despite being bowled out for 213 in their first innings, Surrey still went on to win by 281 runsAddick Addict said:
As much as it is great news, Worcs are more likely candidates to be below us than Surrey.killerandflash said:
Passed by a Surrey fan on the way to the game a few minutes ago. That scoreline has cheered me up!Leuth said:Oh I should have gone to the sodding Oval after all
0 -
Could have been a lot more were it not for a big 9th wicket partnership when Smith and Gibbon decided to swing from the hip which took them from 102-8 to 173-9 and then 231 all out. At one point it was looking like we might win by nearly 400.killerandflash said:
As it turned out despite being bowled out for 213 in their first innings, Surrey still went on to win by 281 runsAddick Addict said:
As much as it is great news, Worcs are more likely candidates to be below us than Surrey.killerandflash said:
Passed by a Surrey fan on the way to the game a few minutes ago. That scoreline has cheered me up!Leuth said:Oh I should have gone to the sodding Oval after all
I've been working on a theory the last few years that the side that completes games in 3 days will win the championship. Basically for the last 15 year every team thats won it has gone on a run where they have won multiple games in 3 days. I'm convinced that extra day rest between games enabling players to stay fresh becomes a compounding factor and creates momentum that helps them keep winning.
Excellent signs for the rey.0 -
I didn't expect Sussex to be topping Div 2 and Yorkshire bottom and winless. That's quite a surprise.0
-
478-6 lead 102. We need to bat on and on.0
-
Minimum of 74 overs left unless they shake hands but don't see Somerset doing that.
Is Garrett able to bat does anyone know? If not we only have 9 wickets.0 -
Evison lbw b Davey 17 (I think)0
- Sponsored links:
-
Swanepoel in with Joe now.0
-
What would be a competitive lead (for a draw I hasten to add)0
-
115 isn't enough for sure given the number of overs remaining.
200 might do it if we can get there.0 -
That won't help0
-
Denly going have to put his foot down and put some runs on the board here.
1 -
494-8 Swanepoel caught in the slips of Pretorius.1
-
They've gone in for lunch.0
-
We're going to lose this sadly. 2 bowling points will be all we get.0
-
We do have someone coming in next who is capable of smashing a few. Stewart and Denly doing so is our only hope.
2 -
Hear hear, AA !Addick Addict said:We do have someone coming in next who is capable of smashing a few. Stewart and Denly doing so is our only hope.1
