Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Ibrahim Fullah - Apr 2025 signs a new pro contract
Comments
-
The question is, are Berry and an unfit Knibbs any better than Fullah?Sword65pf said:
Yes if he is to play, however at the moment I don’t think he needs nor should be playing. Can’t pin all his performance on Ramsay or anyone else other than NJ gambling on him.sam3110 said:
One of about 4 shit passes from Ramsay yesterday.Sword65pf said:
yes fair point it was a shit pass to himCallumcafc said:
It's not even really the one that led to the goal that I'm worried about. That one happened at the edge of their penalty area - you're usually alright if you lose the ball there and don't allow the opposition to counter attack you.Sword65pf said:
Ramsay didn’t fall over from an average challenge which led to a goal against, hopefully he learns from it, there are times to fall down and times to be strong our team get this wrong quite a lot.Callumcafc said:Didn't help him that Ramsay kept giving him the ball in areas where he didn't want it / was obvious he was not in the best position to receive it.
The more problematic one was the one that almost led to 1-3. Fullah had moved to right wing back and Ramsay massively undercooked another pass to him and left him with no options on. He shouldn't be putting a 19 y/o in situations like that.
Fullah needs to play as the 10, and when we aren't chasing a game with the rest of the midfield completely at sea, then he'd have the protection around him and more room for error1 -
Berry no, knibbs possibly but we don’t know yet, it’s the wrong time for Fullah, if we were playing well we could afford his lack of experience possibly, he just isn’t ready yet for championship football, he’s getting bullied when in possession of the ball. Have to say Carey has caused us a big issue the back end of the season, if he’d have held form we wouldn’t have a discussion.fenaddick said:
The question is, are Berry and an unfit Knibbs any better than Fullah?Sword65pf said:
Yes if he is to play, however at the moment I don’t think he needs nor should be playing. Can’t pin all his performance on Ramsay or anyone else other than NJ gambling on him.sam3110 said:
One of about 4 shit passes from Ramsay yesterday.Sword65pf said:
yes fair point it was a shit pass to himCallumcafc said:
It's not even really the one that led to the goal that I'm worried about. That one happened at the edge of their penalty area - you're usually alright if you lose the ball there and don't allow the opposition to counter attack you.Sword65pf said:
Ramsay didn’t fall over from an average challenge which led to a goal against, hopefully he learns from it, there are times to fall down and times to be strong our team get this wrong quite a lot.Callumcafc said:Didn't help him that Ramsay kept giving him the ball in areas where he didn't want it / was obvious he was not in the best position to receive it.
The more problematic one was the one that almost led to 1-3. Fullah had moved to right wing back and Ramsay massively undercooked another pass to him and left him with no options on. He shouldn't be putting a 19 y/o in situations like that.
Fullah needs to play as the 10, and when we aren't chasing a game with the rest of the midfield completely at sea, then he'd have the protection around him and more room for error2 -
Not having it that he was in anyway to blame for the winner.
Yes he lost the ball, but he was about 15 yards away from their goal line FFS!
As I've been banging on about for weeks now is a continual problem with this teams set up when actually plucking up the courage to mount an attack. It's like Russian roulette! Jones is incapable of setting them up to have enough defensive solidity when they do move forward.
So many times does a failed onslaught toward the oppositions box conclude with the opposition countering the ball right back down our throats within seconds of the breakdown.
Destroying a young talent for defensive ineptitude is just plain wrong.1 -
Absolutely he shouldn’t be slaughtered for it, but he was too weak lost the ball, which initiated the attack which led to the goal, let’s call it for what it was rather than go into academy protection mode. I don’t blame him because he shouldn’t be on the pitch at the moment.carly burn said:Not having it that he was in anyway to blame for the winner.
Yes he lost the ball, but he was about 15 yards away from their goal line FFS!
As I've been banging on about for weeks now is a continual problem with this teams set up when actually plucking up the courage to mount an attack. It's like Russian roulette! Jones is incapable of setting them up to have enough defensive solidity when they do move forward.
So many times does a failed onslaught toward the oppositions box conclude with the opposition countering the ball right back down our throats within seconds of the breakdown.
Destroying a young talent for defensive ineptitude is just plain wrong.1 -
He was moved 2/3 different positions during the game yesterday. At this stage, his best moments have come from out wide. It's a different game playing with your back to goal at such a stage in the Championship.
I think he should have controlled the ball and taken it inside as there was a shooting opportunity there.0 -
a solid season long L1 loan will do him the world of good2
