Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Ann Widdecombe RIP
Comments
-
On what basis does it "appear to you" that the police would want a video circulated of an arrest operation against a person who is, as yet, not charged?CaptainRobbo said:
Has appeared all over the place, not just The Sun.sam3110 said:It's The Sun, you reckon they ask anyone permission for anything?
Aappears to me that the Police wanted it to be seen.
The Press still have to abide by contempt of court rules, to ensure no prejudice takes place before any future trial takes place.1 -
Maybe so they can be seen to be on top of things.
Why have the Press released it otherwise?0 -
I would stop speculating and wait for the police investigation to be concludedCaptainRobbo said:
Has appeared all over the place, not just The Sun.sam3110 said:It's The Sun, you reckon they ask anyone permission for anything?
Aappears to me that the Police wanted it to be seen.
The Press still have to abide by contempt of court rules, to ensure no prejudice takes place before any future trial takes place.3 -
Good point.PrincessFiona said:
I would stop speculating and wait for the police investigation to be concludedCaptainRobbo said:
Has appeared all over the place, not just The Sun.sam3110 said:It's The Sun, you reckon they ask anyone permission for anything?
Aappears to me that the Police wanted it to be seen.
The Press still have to abide by contempt of court rules, to ensure no prejudice takes place before any future trial takes place.1 -
Because they do what they want for the clicks.CaptainRobbo said:Maybe so they can be seen to be on top of things.
Why have the Press released it otherwise?1 -
Police demonstrate they are "on top of things" by releasing information stating they have apprehended a suspect in connection with their investigation, which they did before the tawdry tabloid published the video.CaptainRobbo said:Maybe so they can be seen to be on top of things.
Why have the Press released it otherwise?
The video does not tell you anything you didn't already know about the ongoing operation of the investigation.
The video was only published by the Sun in order to satisfy and develop macabre curiosity and ghoulish criminophilia. The task facing the police has not been made easier by the release of the video. Ergo, the police would not have benefited from its release.3 -
and people's prejudices about who is or isn't involved and their leaping to (often) incorrect conclusionsChizz said:
Police demonstrate they are "on top of things" by releasing information stating they have apprehended a suspect in connection with their investigation, which they did before the tawdry tabloid published the video.CaptainRobbo said:Maybe so they can be seen to be on top of things.
Why have the Press released it otherwise?
The video does not tell you anything you didn't already know about the ongoing operation of the investigation.
The video was only published by the Sun in order to satisfy and develop macabre curiosity and ghoulish criminophilia. The task facing the police has not been made easier by the release of the video. Ergo, the police would not have benefited from its release.1 -
And using it to suit their agendaPrincessFiona said:
and people's prejudices about who is or isn't involved and their leaping to (often) incorrect conclusionsChizz said:
Police demonstrate they are "on top of things" by releasing information stating they have apprehended a suspect in connection with their investigation, which they did before the tawdry tabloid published the video.CaptainRobbo said:Maybe so they can be seen to be on top of things.
Why have the Press released it otherwise?
The video does not tell you anything you didn't already know about the ongoing operation of the investigation.
The video was only published by the Sun in order to satisfy and develop macabre curiosity and ghoulish criminophilia. The task facing the police has not been made easier by the release of the video. Ergo, the police would not have benefited from its release.1 -
It’s human nature to speculate. Pretty pointless telling people not to.7
-
on both sides, unfortunatelyME14addick said:
And using it to suit their agendaPrincessFiona said:
and people's prejudices about who is or isn't involved and their leaping to (often) incorrect conclusionsChizz said:
Police demonstrate they are "on top of things" by releasing information stating they have apprehended a suspect in connection with their investigation, which they did before the tawdry tabloid published the video.CaptainRobbo said:Maybe so they can be seen to be on top of things.
Why have the Press released it otherwise?
The video does not tell you anything you didn't already know about the ongoing operation of the investigation.
The video was only published by the Sun in order to satisfy and develop macabre curiosity and ghoulish criminophilia. The task facing the police has not been made easier by the release of the video. Ergo, the police would not have benefited from its release.2 -
Sponsored links:
-
Just wait for the police investigation. Apart from close family, no one else needs to know, and they will be kept informed as much as they can be by the FLOArsenetatters said:It’s human nature to speculate. Pretty pointless telling people not to.3 -
The problem comes when speculation becomes mis/disinformation, leading to more violence. Innocent people have been targeted because speculation becomes the truth for some.Arsenetatters said:It’s human nature to speculate. Pretty pointless telling people not to.4 -
It can be harmful. And it is of no benefit whatsoever.Arsenetatters said:It’s human nature to speculate. Pretty pointless telling people not to.
So, when the police and victims' families express requests not to entertain wild, thoughtless speculation, it's better not to.
But, you do you.1 -
Confirmed it was a targeted attack.0
