Heard rumours today that ryan giggs is one of the footballers who in court on wednesday could see an overturn on a gagging order.
Dont want to speculate as i think its untrue.
[cite]Posted By: Folev the red[/cite]Heard rumours today that ryan giggs is one of the footballers who in court on wednesday could see an overturn on a gagging order. Dont want to speculate as i think its untrue.
Don't believe it for one minute even if Patrick Barclay in today's Times stated that he was "mysteriously absent from Wembley" on Saturday. Fergy was resting him wasn't he?
[cite]Posted By: Addick Addict[/cite]Don't believe it for one minute even if Patrick Barclay in today's Times stated that he was "mysteriously absent from Wembley" on Saturday. Fergy was resting him wasn't he?
Players don't usually miss games at wembley when they're being rested. Rooney was banned and was still there showing his usual dress sense (shirt, tie + tracksuit top, classy)
I just recently finished reading Giggs' autobiography, really good read. He mentioned us a few times, and he mentioned he enjoyed playing us because we would play good football under Curbishley. Great player.
@LiterallyJamie
Not Jamie Redknapp
To be fair, Giggs looks distracted, like he has something on his mind. I can't imogen what it could be.
4 minutes ago via Twitter for iPhone Favorite Undo Retweet Reply
Wouldn't of thought so.With network sites like facebook and twitter around these days this injunction has got to be the biggest waste of money ever. Footballers are thick.
You have to admit that's a bit of a let down........
Bleedin' cheek considering he spends his whole career questioning politicians on their day jobs, their morals and their very reason for living!
Well that's why he came out. He didn't think he should carry on hiding behind a Super Injunction. A Super Injunction from bloody years ago, before they were trendy! Give the bloke some slack! He, as a journalist, saw how ridiculous these things were and rid himself straight away.
Just a shame that most people interested in such gossip don't even know who Andrew Marr is!
You have to admit that's a bit of a let down........
Bleedin' cheek considering he spends his whole career questioning politicians on their day jobs, their morals and their very reason for living!
Well that's why he came out. He didn't think he should carry on hiding behind a Super Injunction. A Super Injunction from bloody years ago, before they were trendy! Give the bloke some slack! He, as a journalist, saw how ridiculous these things were and rid himself straight away.
Just a shame that most people interested in such gossip don't even know who Andrew Marr is!
Or he jumped before he was pushed: Private Eye were to appeal the Injunction anyway, and seeing as there now isn't a child involved, would have most probably won....
Andrew Marr knew his case meant absolutely nothing to the public. He took out the injunction to protect his family years ago. He realises now that his case is not in any way related to these new SUPER INJUNCTIONS.
He's made a good move to distance himself form the filth that are still holding out.
No one cares about Andrew Marr, and he knows that.
[cite]Posted By: Chirpy Red[/cite]You're missing the point fella.
Andrew Marr knew his case meant absolutely nothing to the public. He took out the injunction to protect his family years ago. He realises now that his case is not in any way related to these new SUPER INJUNCTIONS.
He's made a good move to distance himself form the filth that are still holding out.
No one cares about Andrew Marr, and he knows that.
I see your point, and have done all along, but if the case means nothing to the public, why did he feel that he needed an injunction in the first place?
Ian Hislop certainly cares about Andrew Marr - as do a number of his contemporaries. Now you could argue that that is only because of the injunction BUT how could our country's most famous political reporter question an MP on, for example, a sex scandal when he had had one himself? That was the original point, which Marr tried to hide from...
Personally I'm just looking forward to Alan Shearer's comments on Match of the Day when Mr Giggs suffered the same fate that Terry did.....
Comments
Dont want to speculate as i think its untrue.
haha, so you post it on a public forum ?!?!
Players don't usually miss games at wembley when they're being rested. Rooney was banned and was still there showing his usual dress sense (shirt, tie + tracksuit top, classy)
I imagine Tevez has taken the opportunity of being injured to spend a couple of weeks with his family, seeing as they don't live in the country
Not Jamie Redknapp
To be fair, Giggs looks distracted, like he has something on his mind. I can't imogen what it could be.
4 minutes ago via Twitter for iPhone Favorite Undo Retweet Reply
Footballers are thick.
Then you'd be wrong.
Wild speculation and gossip CAN land site owners in trouble
Get over yourself!
You have to admit that's a bit of a let down........
You have to admit that's a bit of a let down........[/quote]
Bleedin' cheek considering he spends his whole career questioning politicians on their day jobs, their morals and their very reason for living!
Well that's why he came out. He didn't think he should carry on hiding behind a Super Injunction. A Super Injunction from bloody years ago, before they were trendy! Give the bloke some slack! He, as a journalist, saw how ridiculous these things were and rid himself straight away.
Just a shame that most people interested in such gossip don't even know who Andrew Marr is!
Or he jumped before he was pushed: Private Eye were to appeal the Injunction anyway, and seeing as there now isn't a child involved, would have most probably won....
Andrew Marr knew his case meant absolutely nothing to the public. He took out the injunction to protect his family years ago. He realises now that his case is not in any way related to these new SUPER INJUNCTIONS.
He's made a good move to distance himself form the filth that are still holding out.
No one cares about Andrew Marr, and he knows that.
I see your point, and have done all along, but if the case means nothing to the public, why did he feel that he needed an injunction in the first place?
Ian Hislop certainly cares about Andrew Marr - as do a number of his contemporaries. Now you could argue that that is only because of the injunction BUT how could our country's most famous political reporter question an MP on, for example, a sex scandal when he had had one himself? That was the original point, which Marr tried to hide from...
Personally I'm just looking forward to Alan Shearer's comments on Match of the Day when Mr Giggs suffered the same fate that Terry did.....