Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Sir Ryan Giggs

124678

Comments

  • cafcpolo
    cafcpolo Posts: 3,811
    edited April 2011
    Visionary ball? More like his only option after a piss poor first touch.
  • DartfordAddick
    DartfordAddick Posts: 1,085
    fantastic player, don't think anyone can argue with that.
  • Folev the red
    Folev the red Posts: 2,087
    Heard rumours today that ryan giggs is one of the footballers who in court on wednesday could see an overturn on a gagging order.
    Dont want to speculate as i think its untrue.
  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 15,814
    [cite]Posted By: Folev the red[/cite]Heard rumours today that ryan giggs is one of the footballers who in court on wednesday could see an overturn on a gagging order.
    Dont want to speculate as i think its untrue.

    haha, so you post it on a public forum ?!?!
  • Folev the red
    Folev the red Posts: 2,087
    irony
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,793
    Don't believe it for one minute even if Patrick Barclay in today's Times stated that he was "mysteriously absent from Wembley" on Saturday. Fergy was resting him wasn't he?
  • MCS
    MCS Posts: 8,404
    Gagging order about what?? Who has he been gagging?? Come on spill em about my not so favourite footballer and i use that term loosely!)
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,455
    [cite]Posted By: Addick Addict[/cite]Don't believe it for one minute even if Patrick Barclay in today's Times stated that he was "mysteriously absent from Wembley" on Saturday. Fergy was resting him wasn't he?

    Players don't usually miss games at wembley when they're being rested. Rooney was banned and was still there showing his usual dress sense (shirt, tie + tracksuit top, classy)
  • Chirpy Red
    Chirpy Red Posts: 7,587
    Tevez wasn't there either. Poor show from club captain.
  • JT
    JT Posts: 12,348
    Members only
  • Sponsored links:



  • StubleyAddick
    StubleyAddick Posts: 2,552
    I just recently finished reading Giggs' autobiography, really good read. He mentioned us a few times, and he mentioned he enjoyed playing us because we would play good football under Curbishley. Great player.
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,149
    FACT I've heard !!
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,149
    FACT I've heard !!
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,455
    [cite]Posted By: Chirpy Red[/cite]Tevez wasn't there either. Poor show from club captain.

    I imagine Tevez has taken the opportunity of being injured to spend a couple of weeks with his family, seeing as they don't live in the country
  • Miserableoldgit
    Miserableoldgit Posts: 21,458
    @LiterallyJamie
    Not Jamie Redknapp
    To be fair, Giggs looks distracted, like he has something on his mind. I can't imogen what it could be.
    4 minutes ago via Twitter for iPhone Favorite Undo Retweet Reply
  • Chirpy Red
    Chirpy Red Posts: 7,587
    This rumour is gathering momentum. Hearing it from all directions now.
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,459
    *This post has been removed for legal reasons*
  • aliwibble
    aliwibble Posts: 26,291
    Seriously guys, it's best to drop the speculation, as it could get AFKA and LookOut in major shit.
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,459
    Wouldn't of thought so.With network sites like facebook and twitter around these days this injunction has got to be the biggest waste of money ever.
    Footballers are thick.
  • Stu_of_Kunming
    Stu_of_Kunming Posts: 17,118
    [cite]Posted By: carly burn[/cite]Wouldn't of thought so

    Then you'd be wrong.

    Wild speculation and gossip CAN land site owners in trouble
  • Sponsored links:



  • Riscardo
    Riscardo Posts: 2,337
    What about the scottish actor?
  • Chirpy Red
    Chirpy Red Posts: 7,587
    [cite]Posted By: Stu of HU5[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: carly burn[/cite]Wouldn't of thought so

    Then you'd be wrong.

    Wild speculation and gossip CAN land site owners in trouble

    Get over yourself!
  • Chirpy Red
    Chirpy Red Posts: 7,587
    Andrew Marr!

    You have to admit that's a bit of a let down........
  • supaclive
    supaclive Posts: 6,514
    [quote][cite]Posted By: Chirpy Red[/cite]Andrew Marr!

    You have to admit that's a bit of a let down........[/quote]


    Bleedin' cheek considering he spends his whole career questioning politicians on their day jobs, their morals and their very reason for living!
  • Chirpy Red
    Chirpy Red Posts: 7,587
    edited April 2011
    [cite]Posted By: supaclive[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Chirpy Red[/cite]Andrew Marr!

    You have to admit that's a bit of a let down........


    Bleedin' cheek considering he spends his whole career questioning politicians on their day jobs, their morals and their very reason for living!

    Well that's why he came out. He didn't think he should carry on hiding behind a Super Injunction. A Super Injunction from bloody years ago, before they were trendy! Give the bloke some slack! He, as a journalist, saw how ridiculous these things were and rid himself straight away.

    Just a shame that most people interested in such gossip don't even know who Andrew Marr is!
  • allez les addicks
    allez les addicks Posts: 1,432
    [cite]Posted By: Chirpy Red[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: supaclive[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Chirpy Red[/cite]Andrew Marr!

    You have to admit that's a bit of a let down........


    Bleedin' cheek considering he spends his whole career questioning politicians on their day jobs, their morals and their very reason for living!

    Well that's why he came out. He didn't think he should carry on hiding behind a Super Injunction. A Super Injunction from bloody years ago, before they were trendy! Give the bloke some slack! He, as a journalist, saw how ridiculous these things were and rid himself straight away.

    Just a shame that most people interested in such gossip don't even know who Andrew Marr is!

    Or he jumped before he was pushed: Private Eye were to appeal the Injunction anyway, and seeing as there now isn't a child involved, would have most probably won....
  • Chirpy Red
    Chirpy Red Posts: 7,587
    You're missing the point fella.

    Andrew Marr knew his case meant absolutely nothing to the public. He took out the injunction to protect his family years ago. He realises now that his case is not in any way related to these new SUPER INJUNCTIONS.
    He's made a good move to distance himself form the filth that are still holding out.


    No one cares about Andrew Marr, and he knows that.
  • supaclive
    supaclive Posts: 6,514
    He took out the superinjunction so his wife couldn't find out more like!
  • supaclive
    supaclive Posts: 6,514
    He took out the superinjunction so his wife couldn't find out more like!
  • allez les addicks
    allez les addicks Posts: 1,432
    [cite]Posted By: Chirpy Red[/cite]You're missing the point fella.

    Andrew Marr knew his case meant absolutely nothing to the public. He took out the injunction to protect his family years ago. He realises now that his case is not in any way related to these new SUPER INJUNCTIONS.
    He's made a good move to distance himself form the filth that are still holding out.


    No one cares about Andrew Marr, and he knows that.

    I see your point, and have done all along, but if the case means nothing to the public, why did he feel that he needed an injunction in the first place?

    Ian Hislop certainly cares about Andrew Marr - as do a number of his contemporaries. Now you could argue that that is only because of the injunction BUT how could our country's most famous political reporter question an MP on, for example, a sex scandal when he had had one himself? That was the original point, which Marr tried to hide from...

    Personally I'm just looking forward to Alan Shearer's comments on Match of the Day when Mr Giggs suffered the same fate that Terry did.....

Categories

“Marketplace”