Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Top gear

13468913

Comments

  • Was the audience the same? You know, the blokes in boot cut jeans and wrap around sun glasses on their head and birds pretending to be into their motors?
  • Not as good as the cricket.
  • Anything with Chris Evans presenting it has me reaching for the off button. A bit like Johnny Vaughan and Chris Moyles how he continues to carve out a career is one of lifes mysteries

    I don't mind him usually - yes he loves himself but he knows what makes good TV/radio so it's usually entertaining.
  • Some people have been waiting for weeks for it to be on, just to slate it.
    People on Twitter etc saying "well this is shit" at 8.02pm

    I liked Matt, didn't like Chris "Jeremy Clarkson" Evans.
    But gotta give it 4-5 weeks before you can really judge it IMO
  • I thought they weren't relaxed enough, it was pretty boring.
  • seth plum said:

    I thought they weren't relaxed enough, it was pretty boring.

    Yep, was looking at my watch about 8.30 wondering when it was gonna end.
  • Some people have been waiting for weeks for it to be on, just to slate it.
    People on Twitter etc saying "well this is shit" at 8.02pm

    I liked Matt, didn't like Chris "Jeremy Clarkson" Evans.
    But gotta give it 4-5 weeks before you can really judge it IMO

    Thing is it took the first lot a while to relax into it and it to become good, but I'm not sure people will give this lot time to bed in.
  • Typing without haven't seen it, but I assume most people expected it to be different, but it sounds like the same formula.

    Personally I would have liked it to be completely different otherwise you get the poor man's Clarkson references.



  • Bring back the Clarksonator......!
  • Sponsored links:


  • It was dull, boring & unimaginative imo. Hope it will improve but doubt it somehow.
  • It'll come good. Matt Le Blanc is surprisingly dull though.
  • shirty5 said:

    TFI Friday with cars

    That's what it should have been. They kept too much of the old format.

    I thought it was ok, hard act to follow obviously, and Leblanc is an asset if they use him properly. Evans came across as untypically nervous. I expect it to improve as the characterisation develops and they start to have the confidence to do their own stuff.

    Lest we forget, even Only Fools and Horses was poorly rated in its first series. Give it time.
  • Just to add, the new hosts were always on a hiding to nothing whoever they were - they're not Clarkson, May and Hammond.
  • Much like the football league show on 5, it will soon just be Chris and Joey sat on a sofa talking about cars
  • Swisdom said:

    Everyone has been waiting to slate this show. People need to take it for what it is - a light hearted entertainment show.

    People would probably knock one out to Clarkson even if their first episode features him smearing himself in chocolate while Hammond licks it off

    It always appears scripted because it is. Once the cast settle and develop their characters im sure it will get better.

    Give it half a dozen episodes before forming a judgement

    Entertainment definition: the action of providing or being provided with amusement or enjoyment.

    Must have missed that somewhere!!

    Stick it in Room 101 with F1, NFL and NBA! Carbuncles on humanity, the lot of them.
  • Thought it was exactly the same as the old series.
    I've found it dull for years but don't think the new lot are rubbish. The format is just old.
  • edited May 2016

    Bring back the Clarksonator......!

    The've got a Clarksonator. Evan's new job is Clark(son Imper)sonator.
  • It was a bit bleaurgh but like others have said. It's the first one so I'll give it a chance

    I will add I'm suprised they didn't change more with the format though given how long they've had to muck about with it. Evans was trying to be Clarkson which whilst being understandable given his popularity is daft as he can be a very engaging presenter. I hope they use Chris Harries to do the proper reviews, his stuff on YouTube is miles better than anything else.

  • Just watched it . Not impressed .
    The worst thing is that I was totally bored by it.
  • Sponsored links:


  • It was poo.

    Top gear was never about the cars only the personalities amongst the presenters may, Hammond and clarkson made the show and made comparing cars more interesting, bbc never got that.

    RIP top gear!
  • edited May 2016
    The content of the episode was fine, same recipe as always - just with worse presenting. As someone that dislikes Chris Evans pretty strongly I was never going to like it, but Matt Le Blanc was fine.

    The problem with the 'it can never be as good as it was' argument is that I found the last couple of series were looking so tired as well. Cool cars and a staged little trip somewhere where they run into trouble... the only thing that carried it just before Clarkson & co. left was the chemistry of the presenters - because it had lost it's originality and was getting boring.

    I suspect that the only thing that can save it is a revamp of format, because otherwise with Evans & Le Blanc it's just the same as it was - but worse. Viewing figures were high for the opening, watch that half and then tail off of the rest of the series.
  • Did find Le Blanc's facial expressions funny in the 3 wheel car to Blackpool, you could read his mind thinking, I was in one of the biggest shows of the 90s now I'm driving 3 wheelers to Blackpool in the rain with a ginger bell end. Too early to judge though.
  • A very old episode with a youthful looking JC.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eB9ei46O1Ok
  • It was poo.

    Top gear was never about the cars only the personalities amongst the presenters may, Hammond and clarkson made the show and made comparing cars more interesting, bbc never got that.

    RIP top gear!

    I don't understand this at all. James May doesn't have a personality. Clarkson is a nasty piece of work and Hammond was a single-joke buffoon. How is that more interesting?
  • JiMMy 85 said:

    It was poo.

    Top gear was never about the cars only the personalities amongst the presenters may, Hammond and clarkson made the show and made comparing cars more interesting, bbc never got that.

    RIP top gear!

    I don't understand this at all. James May doesn't have a personality. Clarkson is a nasty piece of work and Hammond was a single-joke buffoon. How is that more interesting?
    Hammond makes my teeth itch
  • teeth itching is a bad thing right?

    I agree, can't stand Hammond, makes me want to punch the TV screen if only that would wipe the irritating 'cheeky chippy chappy' grin off his face.
  • JiMMy 85 said:

    It was poo.

    Top gear was never about the cars only the personalities amongst the presenters may, Hammond and clarkson made the show and made comparing cars more interesting, bbc never got that.

    RIP top gear!

    I don't understand this at all. James May doesn't have a personality. Clarkson is a nasty piece of work and Hammond was a single-joke buffoon. How is that more interesting?
    Because not everyone, necesarily, shares your opinion.
  • JiMMy 85 said:

    It was poo.

    Top gear was never about the cars only the personalities amongst the presenters may, Hammond and clarkson made the show and made comparing cars more interesting, bbc never got that.

    RIP top gear!

    I don't understand this at all. James May doesn't have a personality. Clarkson is a nasty piece of work and Hammond was a single-joke buffoon. How is that more interesting?
    Hammond makes my teeth itch
    Ha ha. Couldn't have put it better myself. The most annoying person on tv for me. Especially when you noticed the air sucking thing he'd do mid sentence. Couldn't watch him after I noticed that.

    The polarisation of views on clarkson has always fascinated me, both sides seem almost fanatical about him. Say what you will about him, not many can achieve that.
  • The ratings will do the talking.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!