Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Another Shooting In America?

1171820222381

Comments

  • Murder. The officer should be charged, simple
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,331
    shine166 said:

    Chizz said:


    A pretty powerful take-down of the police officer who fatally shot the victim. Pretty eye opening, especially if you read the (several) follow-up tweets.
    Wtf cannabis use has to do with anything I really don't know
    You're making the point, perfectly.
  • shine166
    shine166 Posts: 13,917
    Chizz said:

    shine166 said:

    Chizz said:


    A pretty powerful take-down of the police officer who fatally shot the victim. Pretty eye opening, especially if you read the (several) follow-up tweets.
    Wtf cannabis use has to do with anything I really don't know
    You're making the point, perfectly.

    I don't understand ? Another trigger happy cop murdered another innocent victim... The mention of weed does nothing but part deflect the blame
  • shine166 said:

    Chizz said:


    A pretty powerful take-down of the police officer who fatally shot the victim. Pretty eye opening, especially if you read the (several) follow-up tweets.
    Wtf cannabis use has to do with anything I really don't know
    Tokers are killers. Fact.

    I murdered a king size box of pringles last night....
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,331
    shine166 said:

    Chizz said:

    shine166 said:

    Chizz said:


    A pretty powerful take-down of the police officer who fatally shot the victim. Pretty eye opening, especially if you read the (several) follow-up tweets.
    Wtf cannabis use has to do with anything I really don't know
    You're making the point, perfectly.

    I don't understand ? Another trigger happy cop murdered another innocent victim... The mention of weed does nothing but part deflect the blame
    Read all the tweets. When a victim is shot, the media, instantly highlight the victim'support background, whether they're known drug users, whether they have convictions for violence...

    The background of the police is almost never revealed. So it's enlightening to see someone pull out the kind of typical background information the media broadcast and publish about the victim.
  • shine166
    shine166 Posts: 13,917
    Chizz said:

    shine166 said:

    Chizz said:

    shine166 said:

    Chizz said:


    A pretty powerful take-down of the police officer who fatally shot the victim. Pretty eye opening, especially if you read the (several) follow-up tweets.
    Wtf cannabis use has to do with anything I really don't know
    You're making the point, perfectly.

    I don't understand ? Another trigger happy cop murdered another innocent victim... The mention of weed does nothing but part deflect the blame
    Read all the tweets. When a victim is shot, the media, instantly highlight the victim'support background, whether they're known drug users, whether they have convictions for violence...

    The background of the police is almost never revealed. So it's enlightening to see someone pull out the kind of typical background information the media broadcast and publish about the victim.

    Ah, I get you now.. Makes much more sense with that context
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,764
    To be fair to shine, I think he'd be one of the first to say that whether it was the police officer or the victim.
  • 1StevieG
    1StevieG Posts: 10,964
    MrOneLung said:

    Slightly related:

    In the year March 2015-March 2016 British police fired their weapons a total of 7 times.

    This was the highest number of discharges since 2009.

    In the US there have been 67 people shot and killed by Police in 22 days.
  • 258 African American men were killed by police gunfire last year.
  • ChiAddick
    ChiAddick Posts: 1,781
    edited September 2016
    She murdered Terence. There were 4 other officers right next to her. Wasn't in fear of her life.
  • Sponsored links:



  • ChiAddick
    ChiAddick Posts: 1,781
    Officer charged with Manslaughter re: Tulsa shooting.

  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,467
    Chizz said:


    A pretty powerful take-down of the police officer who fatally shot the victim. Pretty eye opening, especially if you read the (several) follow-up tweets.
    This is so important, thank you for sharing.

  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,843
    Republican Congressman Robert Pittenger, of North Carolina, told the BBC the protesters hated white people because white people were successful, but he later apologised for his comments in an interview with CNN.

    This is an elected representative of the people ffs - outrageous.

    Not sure about God Bless America - should be God Help America.
  • Greenie
    Greenie Posts: 9,172
    ChiAddick said:

    Officer charged with Manslaughter re: Tulsa shooting.

    She gunned down an unarmed man and its manslaughter?? First degree Murder should be the charge.
  • Greenie
    Greenie Posts: 9,172
    Good for her.
  • ChiAddick
    ChiAddick Posts: 1,781
    Greenie said:

    ChiAddick said:

    Officer charged with Manslaughter re: Tulsa shooting.

    She gunned down an unarmed man and its manslaughter?? First degree Murder should be the charge.
    Agree
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,467
    ChiAddick said:

    Greenie said:

    ChiAddick said:

    Officer charged with Manslaughter re: Tulsa shooting.

    She gunned down an unarmed man and its manslaughter?? First degree Murder should be the charge.
    Agree
    This was my initial reaction but in reading around it it will be much easier to get a conviction on manslaughter. Murder can insinuate some sort of pre-meditation (this is where I get a little confused because there is pre-meditated and non-PM murder). But, as a police officer, it will be very difficult to convict her of murder. Sorry, I know this is a bit convoluted, but in short it seems it's a good move by the District Attorney.

    What I find more outrageous is that she was charged and released.
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,467
    Greenie said:

    Good for her.
    Not good for her, breaking and entering isn't a crime punished by death!
  • Baldybonce
    Baldybonce Posts: 9,640
    SDAddick said:

    Greenie said:

    Good for her.
    Not good for her, breaking and entering isn't a crime punished by death!
    Well there's an easy way to avoid the punishment.
  • Sponsored links:



  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,467
    So I'll say in the first watching of the video I didn't realize the men had guns, so I back off on my previous statement because this seems to be a genuine case of self defence.

    That said, we have "Stand Your Ground" laws in this country whereby if at any time you feel you're threatened, you can shoot someone. This was made famous in the George Zimmerman/Treyvon Martin case whereby Martin was walking home, was accosted by Zimmerman, someone with no legal authority, a scuffle ensued, Martin was shot dead, and Zimmerman was acquitted based on "stand your ground."
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,467

    SDAddick said:

    Greenie said:

    Good for her.
    Not good for her, breaking and entering isn't a crime punished by death!
    Well there's an easy way to avoid the punishment.
    That's not how legal punishments and proportionality work though. As I said above I didn't realize the men in this had guns so this is self defense, but as mentioned just above Terrence Crutcher's car broke down while black in the middle of the road and what was his punishment? Death. Treyvon Martin was walking home eating skittles while black and what was his punishment? Death. Eric Garner was illegally selling cigarettes on the street and what was his punishment? Death. Alton Sterling may have resisted arrest, though why he was being arrested was unclear and what was his punishment? Death.

    None of these "crimes" carry the death penalty. So this notion that there is a way to avoid such consequences is ludicrous.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,314
    If you home invade in a country where gun possession is legal then you're kind of asking for it tbh

    I mean, it probably shouldn't be legal, but that video is completely irrelevant to the main thrust of this discussion, which involves police procedure
  • CAFCBourne
    CAFCBourne Posts: 3,790
    Put it this way if someone had broken into my house and I come across them I would hit them repeatedly with anything I could until they were no longer a threat to me or my family.

    If that's deemed wrong by law so be it
  • Baldybonce
    Baldybonce Posts: 9,640
    SDAddick said:

    SDAddick said:

    Greenie said:

    Good for her.
    Not good for her, breaking and entering isn't a crime punished by death!
    Well there's an easy way to avoid the punishment.
    That's not how legal punishments and proportionality work though. As I said above I didn't realize the men in this had guns so this is self defense, but as mentioned just above Terrence Crutcher's car broke down while black in the middle of the road and what was his punishment? Death. Treyvon Martin was walking home eating skittles while black and what was his punishment? Death. Eric Garner was illegally selling cigarettes on the street and what was his punishment? Death. Alton Sterling may have resisted arrest, though why he was being arrested was unclear and what was his punishment? Death.

    None of these "crimes" carry the death penalty. So this notion that there is a way to avoid such consequences is ludicrous.
    I answered the post about breaking and entering. It really is quite simple, if you don't break into peoples houses you won't get shot in there.
  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 21,598

    Put it this way if someone had broken into my house and I come across them I would hit them repeatedly with anything I could until they were no longer a threat to me or my family.

    If that's deemed wrong by law so be it

    I wouldn't, I'd wake the wife up and let her deal with it.
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,467

    SDAddick said:

    SDAddick said:

    Greenie said:

    Good for her.
    Not good for her, breaking and entering isn't a crime punished by death!
    Well there's an easy way to avoid the punishment.
    That's not how legal punishments and proportionality work though. As I said above I didn't realize the men in this had guns so this is self defense, but as mentioned just above Terrence Crutcher's car broke down while black in the middle of the road and what was his punishment? Death. Treyvon Martin was walking home eating skittles while black and what was his punishment? Death. Eric Garner was illegally selling cigarettes on the street and what was his punishment? Death. Alton Sterling may have resisted arrest, though why he was being arrested was unclear and what was his punishment? Death.

    None of these "crimes" carry the death penalty. So this notion that there is a way to avoid such consequences is ludicrous.
    I answered the post about breaking and entering. It really is quite simple, if you don't break into peoples houses you won't get shot in there.
    So you would feel the same if they were unarmed? Because in most states you'll go to jail for manslaughter.
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,978
    SDAddick said:

    SDAddick said:

    SDAddick said:

    Greenie said:

    Good for her.
    Not good for her, breaking and entering isn't a crime punished by death!
    Well there's an easy way to avoid the punishment.
    That's not how legal punishments and proportionality work though. As I said above I didn't realize the men in this had guns so this is self defense, but as mentioned just above Terrence Crutcher's car broke down while black in the middle of the road and what was his punishment? Death. Treyvon Martin was walking home eating skittles while black and what was his punishment? Death. Eric Garner was illegally selling cigarettes on the street and what was his punishment? Death. Alton Sterling may have resisted arrest, though why he was being arrested was unclear and what was his punishment? Death.

    None of these "crimes" carry the death penalty. So this notion that there is a way to avoid such consequences is ludicrous.
    I answered the post about breaking and entering. It really is quite simple, if you don't break into peoples houses you won't get shot in there.
    So you would feel the same if they were unarmed? Because in most states you'll go to jail for manslaughter.
    A startled intruder could do as much damage to someone unarmed as they could armed. If they felt cornered they could grab anything. Do you take that chance? It's a difficult one but something that would be made a lot easier if you didn't intrude in someone's home.
  • Baldybonce
    Baldybonce Posts: 9,640
    SDAddick said:

    SDAddick said:

    SDAddick said:

    Greenie said:

    Good for her.
    Not good for her, breaking and entering isn't a crime punished by death!
    Well there's an easy way to avoid the punishment.
    That's not how legal punishments and proportionality work though. As I said above I didn't realize the men in this had guns so this is self defense, but as mentioned just above Terrence Crutcher's car broke down while black in the middle of the road and what was his punishment? Death. Treyvon Martin was walking home eating skittles while black and what was his punishment? Death. Eric Garner was illegally selling cigarettes on the street and what was his punishment? Death. Alton Sterling may have resisted arrest, though why he was being arrested was unclear and what was his punishment? Death.

    None of these "crimes" carry the death penalty. So this notion that there is a way to avoid such consequences is ludicrous.
    I answered the post about breaking and entering. It really is quite simple, if you don't break into peoples houses you won't get shot in there.
    So you would feel the same if they were unarmed? Because in most states you'll go to jail for manslaughter.
    No, i'd wait to see if they were armed, maybe let them have first shot or first slash with a knife then i'd think how should I respond.
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,467
    edited September 2016

    SDAddick said:

    SDAddick said:

    SDAddick said:

    Greenie said:

    Good for her.
    Not good for her, breaking and entering isn't a crime punished by death!
    Well there's an easy way to avoid the punishment.
    That's not how legal punishments and proportionality work though. As I said above I didn't realize the men in this had guns so this is self defense, but as mentioned just above Terrence Crutcher's car broke down while black in the middle of the road and what was his punishment? Death. Treyvon Martin was walking home eating skittles while black and what was his punishment? Death. Eric Garner was illegally selling cigarettes on the street and what was his punishment? Death. Alton Sterling may have resisted arrest, though why he was being arrested was unclear and what was his punishment? Death.

    None of these "crimes" carry the death penalty. So this notion that there is a way to avoid such consequences is ludicrous.
    I answered the post about breaking and entering. It really is quite simple, if you don't break into peoples houses you won't get shot in there.
    So you would feel the same if they were unarmed? Because in most states you'll go to jail for manslaughter.
    A startled intruder could do as much damage to someone unarmed as they could armed. If they felt cornered they could grab anything. Do you take that chance? It's a difficult one but something that would be made a lot easier if you didn't intrude in someone's home.
    Hypothetically yes I suppose. But the law here makes really clear distinction between armed and unarmed crimes, ones with deadly weapons, etc. because it is so much easier for something with a weapon, namely a gun, to escalate into something deadly.

    Perhaps I am jaded by viewing this through the lens of what goes disgustingly wrong with "stand your ground laws." They are markedly different from what @Baldybonce @ValleyGary @Bourneaddick describe, which seems to be on average self defense. I am of course not against self defense. Apologies if this is my bias, or perhaps an indication of the different way crimes are treated here, or perhaps both.
This discussion has been closed.