Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Saturday, Jan 2nd, 5pm sit-in protest at The Valley.

1568101117

Comments

  • It looks to me that sadly there is at least a shred of something. Peter Varney and Airman can be painted, as they often are, as bitter ex-employees but the email trail indicates that something hopeful was being stymied.
    I hope Prague is right that there can be a genuine reconciliation between two high profile Charlton men, but reconciliation will depend on cool heads and honesty from all sides with no point scoring. Richard Murray undoubtedly did a whole lot of good for Charlton and that needs to be respected, but Richard can recognise the new reality and help, or events will sideline him anyway and his influence will be disregarded.
    I was at the fans meeting in November when Richard was there and his contribution on that occasion was unconvincing to me. Others have reported on him checking his phone under the table during what many saw as an important and seminal meeting, which isn't very impressive.
    The new reality, and there is a lot at stake for the reputation of Peter Varney and Airman, the new reality is that if a deal can be struck there is a buyer out there (I have heard more than one). Roland is no longer the only game in town even if he is the keeper of the keys right now. We have a glimmer of hope.
    The only issue for me is, is it supposed to be a sit in after the game, or all round the back by Sam's statue? I vote for the main entrance, I will be there.
  • RedChaser said:

    Murray has the chance now to step away from the current regime to back the protests & the potential takeover, it may wound his pride and most likely mean he has no more power then most of us fans but this could be his last chance to salvage any respect from your average Charlton fan.

    I hope he takes that chance.

    Sadly for all concerned I think it's too late if as has been reported he denied in the directors box on Monday any knowledge of PV wanting a meeting when he has actually been copied in on the infamous emails! Unless of course they went to his junk mail :open_mouth: I hope I'm wrong.
    True, I just would like to see him do the right thing now, out of the respect for things he did in the past, when my generation fell in love with this great club.
  • Well RM can come out and deny it then as the clear accusation is out there. If he doesn't he looks guilty.

    This this and this with balls on.

    Come out to defend yourself Mr Murray.

    And while you're at it tell us what the f**k is going on with OUR football club!
  • SID said:

    Uboat said:

    It would really help if people stopped proposing alternatives and just go with one thing. We can try other stuff another time.

    You need to brainstorm ideas thats why they are being mentioned.
    No you don't, not on this thread. Just get on board with the OP and turn up if you can. Discussing other options is just going to cause confusion and possibly dilute the protest that's been put forward.

    Is it dear oh dear
  • RedChaser said:

    Murray has the chance now to step away from the current regime to back the protests & the potential takeover, it may wound his pride and most likely mean he has no more power then most of us fans but this could be his last chance to salvage any respect from your average Charlton fan.

    I hope he takes that chance.

    Sadly for all concerned I think it's too late if as has been reported he denied in the directors box on Monday any knowledge of PV wanting a meeting when he has actually been copied in on the infamous emails! Unless of course they went to his junk mail :open_mouth: I hope I'm wrong.
    True, I just would like to see him do the right thing now, out of the respect for things he did in the past, when my generation fell in love with this great club.
    He's been doing the wrong things on a consistent basis since 2006 (his decisions/ego ultimately responsible for our relegation from the Prem right through to what's happening now), so I wouldn't hold your breath.
  • sorry Airman, I confused your post with Kent Red's

    But my answer to your question lies in my earlier remarks about the personalities of both parties. Whatever the rights and wrongs, neither is going to back down easily in public. You know that.

    You realise that implicit in that is the recognition that Murray needs to "back down", whereas if he was entirely innocent in this episode there would be no backing down to be done. I think Richard has a choice - he can be part of a solution or he can go down with the Belgians, because it's clear they are going down and at the moment they are taking the club and him with them. When he tells people we both know well that Fraeye is the right appointment and, separately, that Meire is doing a good job, I assume that he has chosen the latter option.

    I am aware, as I referenced obliquely in the Voice, that Richard has spoken to an alternative takeover interest, which may or may not be credible, but why would RD not want to hear about both? And how much has he told RD about that?
  • sorry Airman, I confused your post with Kent Red's

    But my answer to your question lies in my earlier remarks about the personalities of both parties. Whatever the rights and wrongs, neither is going to back down easily in public. You know that.

    You realise that implicit in that is the recognition that Murray needs to "back down", whereas if he was entirely innocent in this episode there would be no backing down to be done. I think Richard has a choice - he can be part of a solution or he can go down with the Belgians, because it's clear they are going down and at the moment they are taking the club and him with them. When he tells people we both know well that Fraeye is the right appointment and, separately, that Meire is doing a good job, I assume that he has chosen the latter option.

    I am aware, as I referenced obliquely in the Voice, that Richard has spoken to an alternative takeover interest, which may or may not be credible, but why would RD not want to hear about both? And how much has he told RD about that?
    Another one???
  • edited December 2015
    boggzy said:

    RedChaser said:

    Murray has the chance now to step away from the current regime to back the protests & the potential takeover, it may wound his pride and most likely mean he has no more power then most of us fans but this could be his last chance to salvage any respect from your average Charlton fan.

    I hope he takes that chance.

    Sadly for all concerned I think it's too late if as has been reported he denied in the directors box on Monday any knowledge of PV wanting a meeting when he has actually been copied in on the infamous emails! Unless of course they went to his junk mail :open_mouth: I hope I'm wrong.
    True, I just would like to see him do the right thing now, out of the respect for things he did in the past, when my generation fell in love with this great club.
    He's been doing the wrong things on a consistent basis since 2006 (his decisions/ego ultimately responsible for our relegation from the Prem right through to what's happening now), so I wouldn't hold your breath.
    Oh I don't disagree, just respectful nostalgia I guess, me wanting to see him leave with some sort of respect.

    As if one thing this current ownership has done it make me even more grateful to Varney, Murray, Curbs and all the other people who deserve to be named, for what we had in the 90s & much of the 00s, not many generation of Charlton fan gets it as easy as mine did to fall in love with this great club.
  • I will 100% be there.
    But, my questions are:
    1.Is there a risk some people will take it too far? We want this to be peaceful and effective and the actions of a few people could ruin it
    2. If we win (i know, not very likely) how do we ensure we still get people to attend?
    3. What is our message? Sort your s***t out and start managing the club with a modicum of sense or simply, get out of our club?
  • Sponsored links:


  • rowe88 said:

    I will 100% be there.
    But, my questions are:
    1.Is there a risk some people will take it too far? We want this to be peaceful and effective and the actions of a few people could ruin it
    2. If we win (i know, not very likely) how do we ensure we still get people to attend?
    3. What is our message? Sort your s***t out and start managing the club with a modicum of sense or simply, get out of our club?

    "Get out of our club" I believe from Airman's posting.

    There's nothing for them to sort out, they've made it clear what they're doing.

    Number 1 is a risk worth taking - either do it or do nothing.
  • RedChaser said:

    Murray has the chance now to step away from the current regime to back the protests & the potential takeover, it may wound his pride and most likely mean he has no more power then most of us fans but this could be his last chance to salvage any respect from your average Charlton fan.

    I hope he takes that chance.

    Sadly for all concerned I think it's too late if as has been reported he denied in the directors box on Monday any knowledge of PV wanting a meeting when he has actually been copied in on the infamous emails! Unless of course they went to his junk mail :open_mouth: I hope I'm wrong.
    Unlikely as the first mail to copy him in was from Roland himself.
  • There will almost certainly people trying to take it too far. As Henry says we should try and stop this. However even if we can't we must NOT walk away we must stay and show strength in numbers whatever.
    It actually shows more if we win and still protest.

    Can we also stand united in this battle. Please no more of this RM/PV he says/she says rubbish. Airman has proved there are other options. That is enough for now. The rest is irrelevant for now.
  • How do people think the club will react to the protest?
    Will they just pull down the blinds on the lounges facing the car park or have the belmarsh bullies try to move us along?
    I think if the latter is done with their usual subtle tactics, this is where we have to make sure things don't get ugly. In that it's our message that gets reported rather than a few scuffles.
    As katrien is an advocate of taking pics, perhaps if the belmarsh bullies try to move us on, a few make sure they know they are being filmed on mobiles.
  • edited December 2015
    rowe88 said:

    I will 100% be there.
    But, my questions are:
    1.Is there a risk some people will take it too far? We want this to be peaceful and effective and the actions of a few people could ruin it
    2. If we win (i know, not very likely) how do we ensure we still get people to attend?
    3. What is our message? Sort your s***t out and start managing the club with a modicum of sense or simply, get out of our club?

    This has become more than a simple get them out protest. We now know there is interest in the club from others so it has to be a demand to talk to them (and leave with some credit). It should be a no brainer given the current direction of the club. Even if we do win, supporters will want to get behind that. I can't see us winning though!
  • looks like rain on the day according to the BBC.
  • SIDSID
    edited December 2015

    SID said:

    Uboat said:

    It would really help if people stopped proposing alternatives and just go with one thing. We can try other stuff another time.

    You need to brainstorm ideas thats why they are being mentioned.
    No you don't, not on this thread. Just get on board with the OP and turn up if you can. Discussing other options is just going to cause confusion and possibly dilute the protest that's been put forward.

    Is it dear oh dear
    Yes chippy it is. The bloke who suggested this protest has obviously got his finger nearer the pulse than me or you.
    The protest is unambiguous non-violent and as simple as you could wish for. Rather than get all school girl sulky just get on board.

    Edit sp
  • How do people think the club will react to the protest?
    Will they just pull down the blinds on the lounges facing the car park or have the belmarsh bullies try to move us along?
    I think if the latter is done with their usual subtle tactics, this is where we have to make sure things don't get ugly. In that it's our message that gets reported rather than a few scuffles.
    As katrien is an advocate of taking pics, perhaps if the belmarsh bullies try to move us on, a few make sure they know they are being filmed on mobiles.

    Film them, film them, film them.
    Even if you don't know how to do it on your camera like me, even if the battery runs out, hold the phone up to their faces.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Would it be worth emailing the VOTV article to the Forest Board so it doesn't get spun that "they're just unhappy with the decor in the toilets" as to why we're protesting? Not that it matters a toss what other clubs think of us but would make it uncomfortable and harder to laugh off in their presence.

    Their owner by coincidence is Kuwaiti.

    Great idea
  • It feels like the dog (us) have found a bone.
  • What is this email trail?
  • edited December 2015
    dizzee said:

    What is this email trail?

    http://www.votvonline.com/

    It's the pdf at the foot of the latest article on there.
  • dizzee said:

    What is this email trail?

    look at VOTVonline, it's reproduced there
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!