Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Transfer rumours thread (DEADLINE DAY starts page 300)

1143144146148149346

Comments

  • I'm sure Slade would have looked at Austria as the point where he had the majority of his squad before hand! It would be strange if he didn't!
  • Belgians can't afford to run an English Football Club, and their scheme is not working and we are off to the conference.
  • A winger would be a key part of my extensive list. All I can find is that he is left footed, did well for Doncaster on loan. Says he is left or right midfielder. Promising part of the jigsaw for Slade if we sign him.
  • Doncaster fan on Twitter said he was more central, played from DM to a number 10 role.
  • edited July 2016

    Given injuries, 2 fit CBs inc Tex expected to be sold. Only JJ as CM and he's been playing LM. Zero keepers. 2 strikers, one injured plus 18yo Lookie who may stay or be sold when he returns in a month's time. Four trialists, one vanished and two deemed ineffective by most who watched friendlies. Bare bones squad with 12 days to Bury. Rest will be academy fill-ins or panic aquisitions with no time to bed in. No cover at RB or either wing. Shambles!!!!

    But they have learned the lessons!!!!!
  • Would be Grant be a loan or perm?
  • Would be Grant be a loan or perm?

    A busfare back to Norwich according to most reports.
  • Would be Grant be a loan or perm?

    Would assume loan as article says he signed a new contract with Everton this week
  • J BLOCK said:

    tajaddick said:

    Matt Ingram former Wycombe GK now third choice at Qpr being touted for season long loan with us.

    Christ, we are now going for third choice QPR goalkeeper - Despise these Belgians
    Made 124 appearances for Wycombe and he's only 23. Would actually be a decent signing
  • Sponsored links:



  • What the hell happened to Bob Scout or Roger Recruit or whatever his bloody name is who was hired as our experienced head of recruitment?

    Is he on extended holiday in Poland or has Ms Nightmeire locked him the laundry room?

    What was the point of hiring him if he was only allowed to do his job for about 72 hours? We could have put him on trial for a week and saved some more Euros

    Absolute bloody shambles as usual. The 'new era' indeed.
  • So far we've got rid of
    Sarr
    Watt
    Vetokele
    Tucadean
    JBG
    Cousins
    Pope
    Probably Henderson

    All amongst the highest earners at the club and we've only replaced them with 3 players.

    Add in the likes of Fanni, Suk Young leaving after their loans we've got an even smaller squad than before. Whilst also carrying Diarra, Kashi, Solly, JJ and Bauer who have history of picking up injuries making them miss a chunk of the season.

    2 weeks before the start of the season we are in a terrible state. The ownership of the club has again shown a total lack of ambition to actually want to succeed this season.

    Should add Big Mak to the list of departures as I think Novak is probably a direct replacement for him whilst Holmes replaces JBG and Ajosi replaces Vetokele. You can add Ceballos to the injury prone list, Motta to the departures list and then there's the remaining no-hopers from last season Ba and Bergditch who I doubt will be around this season. Not looking very good at the moment!
  • Bergdich has already gone though
  • edited July 2016
    Reece Burke linked in SLP.
    West Ham centre back who won player of the year at Bradford last season.
    And guess what......it would be a loan.
  • Valley11 said:

    Reece Burke linked in SLP.
    West Ham centre back who won player of the year at Bradford last season.
    And guess what......it would be a loan.

    Sounds unlikely, from the article. There is evidently no money for permanent transfers
  • Valley11 said:

    Reece Burke linked in SLP.
    West Ham centre back who won player of the year at Bradford last season.
    And guess what......it would be a loan.

    Charlton are keen on a loan deal for West Ham defender Reece Burke.
    The Addicks have made their interest in the 19-year-old defender known to the Premier League outfit.
    But the South London Press understands that their chances of getting Burke - who won Bradford’s Player of the Year award last season - are slim.
    Newcastle have also been linked with handing Burke a chance to show what he can do at Championship level.
    The England U20 centre-back is a top prospect and Hammers boss Slaven Bilic has previously stated: “He will stay with us only if he has a good chance to play.

    http://www.southlondonpress.co.uk/article.cfm?id=120201
  • edited July 2016

    Oh good we're signing Conor mcaleny again

    Do you mean the same Conor McAleny who excelled with Wigan in League One last season?
  • Sponsored links:


  • Valley11 said:

    Reece Burke linked in SLP.
    West Ham centre back who won player of the year at Bradford last season.
    And guess what......it would be a loan.

    Saw him play for Bradford a bit. Nothing special but solid enough. Gets forward well at set pieces and makes a nuisance of himself, but, like any Phil Parkinson team, hoofed the ball upfield every time he had it. Highly rated at West Ham though.
  • So far we've got rid of
    Sarr
    Watt
    Vetokele
    Tucadean
    JBG
    Cousins
    Pope
    Probably Henderson

    All amongst the highest earners at the club and we've only replaced them with 3 players.

    Add in the likes of Fanni, Suk Young leaving after their loans we've got an even smaller squad than before. Whilst also carrying Diarra, Kashi, Solly, JJ and Bauer who have history of picking up injuries making them miss a chunk of the season.

    2 weeks before the start of the season we are in a terrible state. The ownership of the club has again shown a total lack of ambition to actually want to succeed this season.

    you also forgot Motta, Big Mak, Reza, Dmitrovic, Bergdich. All squad players.
  • So far we've got rid of
    Sarr
    Watt
    Vetokele
    Tucadean
    JBG
    Cousins
    Pope
    Probably Henderson

    All amongst the highest earners at the club and we've only replaced them with 3 players.

    Add in the likes of Fanni, Suk Young leaving after their loans we've got an even smaller squad than before. Whilst also carrying Diarra, Kashi, Solly, JJ and Bauer who have history of picking up injuries making them miss a chunk of the season.

    2 weeks before the start of the season we are in a terrible state. The ownership of the club has again shown a total lack of ambition to actually want to succeed this season.

    Don't worry, the entire board including Richard Murray said they had underestimated the Championship last season and learnt from their mistakes. I believe they also said something along the lines of "they are going to build a squad this year capable of promotion from league 1"

    When have the owners ever got it wrong? :smile:
  • edited July 2016

    Top stuff. If he's half as successful as the last bloke called Connor who signed on loan from Everton he'll be a sure fire hit.
    Think you are missing an "s" there Clem...
  • http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/liverpool-insisting-playing-clause-loan-11641458
    But a follow up move to take the 20-year-old on loan has foundered because Wigan cannot guarantee that Brannagan will play in at least three-quarters of their matches during his loan spell.

    The Echo understands that the Reds now insist on a “75 per cent” clause for all of their loaned players, whereby clubs are penalised financially if a player they have loaned does not play in a specified ratio of matches.
    An interesting story, that Liverpool don't charge loan fees, but insist that players loaned out play 75% of the matches, or else there will be financial penalties. I wonder if any of our loan signings have had similar clauses
  • You just wonder how long Russell Slade will stay when he realises what a big mistake he has made.
  • edited July 2016

    http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/liverpool-insisting-playing-clause-loan-11641458

    But a follow up move to take the 20-year-old on loan has foundered because Wigan cannot guarantee that Brannagan will play in at least three-quarters of their matches during his loan spell.

    The Echo understands that the Reds now insist on a “75 per cent” clause for all of their loaned players, whereby clubs are penalised financially if a player they have loaned does not play in a specified ratio of matches.

    An interesting story, that Liverpool don't charge loan fees, but insist that players loaned out play 75% of the matches, or else there will be financial penalties. I wonder if any of our loan signings have had similar clauses

    Sanogo had something similar. Not sure if it came into account as he was injured for the majority of his time at Charlton
  • Ben18 said:

    http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/liverpool-insisting-playing-clause-loan-11641458

    But a follow up move to take the 20-year-old on loan has foundered because Wigan cannot guarantee that Brannagan will play in at least three-quarters of their matches during his loan spell.

    The Echo understands that the Reds now insist on a “75 per cent” clause for all of their loaned players, whereby clubs are penalised financially if a player they have loaned does not play in a specified ratio of matches.

    An interesting story, that Liverpool don't charge loan fees, but insist that players loaned out play 75% of the matches, or else there will be financial penalties. I wonder if any of our loan signings have had similar clauses

    Sanogo had something similar. Not sure if it came into account as he was injured for the majority of his time at Charlton
    Years ago we signed Carl Ikeme on loan from Wolves as Rob Elliott was injured, and he went straight in the first team with Randolph left fuming on the bench - not surprisingly, Randolph didn't renew his contract and left us on a Bosman soon afterwards

    At the time it was rumoured that we "had" to play Ikeme as part of the loan arrangement
  • edited July 2016
    Ben18 said:

    http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/liverpool-insisting-playing-clause-loan-11641458

    But a follow up move to take the 20-year-old on loan has foundered because Wigan cannot guarantee that Brannagan will play in at least three-quarters of their matches during his loan spell.

    The Echo understands that the Reds now insist on a “75 per cent” clause for all of their loaned players, whereby clubs are penalised financially if a player they have loaned does not play in a specified ratio of matches.

    An interesting story, that Liverpool don't charge loan fees, but insist that players loaned out play 75% of the matches, or else there will be financial penalties. I wonder if any of our loan signings have had similar clauses

    Sanogo had something similar. Not sure if it came into account as he was injured for the majority of his time at Charlton
    With Sonogo the percentage of his wages we payed went down with every game he played and after five full game (sub apps = 1/2 a game) we paid nothing

    Due to suspension and injury I don't think he played five games (counting subs as 1/2) so not sure what happened? Did we have to keep paying his full wages or did Arsenal let us off because he was injured?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!