Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)

1…19361937193919411942…2262

Comments

  • 1905
    1905 Posts: 2,751
    So the Monday Meltdown is happening!!
  • jac52
    jac52 Posts: 636
    Off_it said:
    Curb_It said:
    Come on everyone lets get back on track and stop picking at each other and just pick at any slivers of info we get.  Any info is welcome.  Even if sometimes we might think a bit comical or repetitive.

    I think Prague should hurry up with his further and better particulars to the comments his contact made.  We are waiting with baited breath here @PragueAddick
    Meltdown Monday is fake news.

    Temultuous Tuesday is where it's at.
    I'm looking forward to Wanky Wednesday personally.
  • JamesSeed
    JamesSeed Posts: 17,380
    Threatening Thursday will be awesome!
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    JamesSeed said:
    Threatening Thursday will be awesome!
    We'll all meet up in the Macro car park for that!
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Then Scarf Saturday is upon us
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    MuttleyCAFC said:
    We know he has not accepted at least two £30m bids. Does anybody on here think £30m is cheeky? I think £30m is generous and therefore it is ridiculous for him to publicly claim he is desperate to sell the club. We know he is a liar so maybe we shouldn't be too surprised by it however. How much he wants is harder to know as the price seems to vary depending on who you are and when you ask?
    Put in 40m and be done with it. 
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    Dazzler21 said:
    MuttleyCAFC said:
    We know he has not accepted at least two £30m bids. Does anybody on here think £30m is cheeky? I think £30m is generous and therefore it is ridiculous for him to publicly claim he is desperate to sell the club. We know he is a liar so maybe we shouldn't be too surprised by it however. How much he wants is harder to know as the price seems to vary depending on who you are and when you ask?
    Put in 40m and be done with it. 
    He won't accept £40m either by all accounts :)
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    Put in £77m as Napa said and be done with it.
  • CAFCBell
    CAFCBell Posts: 81
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    Then Scarf Saturday is upon us
    What happened to Friday? 

    Feckless Friday. 
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    Dazzler21 said:
    Put in £77m as Napa said and be done with it.
    Can we go halves?
  • Sponsored links:



  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Dazzler21 said:
    Put in £77m as Napa said and be done with it.
    Make it a round £80m
  • charltonaddickedmatt
    charltonaddickedmatt Posts: 1,257
    85m
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    Sold to that man!
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    edited July 2019
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Put in £77m as Napa said and be done with it.
    Make it a round £80m
    Deal. The club is Big Rob's, by decree of internet forum sale of agreement. 

    Any attempt to abandon this deal will be seen as ungentlemanly conduct. 

    UNGENTLEMANLY SIR.

  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Can I pay £50 a month
  • JamesSeed
    JamesSeed Posts: 17,380
    edited July 2019
    CharltonByBlood said:
    You are way too sensitive about fans getting sick of the Aussies JS

    Stop taking it so personally. For example, I think they are useless and skint and need to leave it now, but I am not calling you useless, or skint etc etc


    I might be useless and skint, but I’m not etc etc! How dare you!
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    edited July 2019
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    Can I pay £50 a month
    Only if you agree to re-sell within a week to the richest seeming investor you can find that will not be another Roland.
  • AmandaHoldensCat
    AmandaHoldensCat Posts: 126
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    Then Scarf Saturday is upon us
    The Aussies will love that 
  • CAFCDAZ
    CAFCDAZ Posts: 1,198
    The Aussies lose consortium members quicker than RD sells players. Fucking what hope do we have!
  • Solidgone
    Solidgone Posts: 10,207
    Dazzler21 said:
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Put in £77m as Napa said and be done with it.
    Make it a round £80m
    Deal. The club is Big Rob's, by decree of internet forum sale of agreement. 

    Any attempt to abandon this deal will be seen as ungentlemanly conduct. 

    UNGENTLEMANLY SIR.

    Do we get a wafer with that...?
  • Sponsored links:



  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    Solidgone said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Put in £77m as Napa said and be done with it.
    Make it a round £80m
    Deal. The club is Big Rob's, by decree of internet forum sale of agreement. 

    Any attempt to abandon this deal will be seen as ungentlemanly conduct. 

    UNGENTLEMANLY SIR.

    Do we get a wafer with that...?
    You can have a club, a training ground and stadium, a wafer, an ice cream and a cheeky handjob from Gemma behind the bike sheds for that price.
  • MartinCAFC
    MartinCAFC Posts: 3,219
    edited July 2019
    Personally I don't want a consortium at the club Aussies or not, consortiums are pulled together because one person outright can't afford to do the deal themself or isn't willing to even if they do have the money.

    The other problem with consortiums as is being reported are investors who then want out of the consortium what happens then? Would they retain all funds from the sale of a player to cover there costs like RD is doing? And also how would decisions be carried out if nobody had outright control? Sometimes you can have too many decision makers.

    I so wanted to LOL James Seed's earlier post when he said another investor has walked away but I didn't out of respect because he only passed on what he was told even if I did laugh when reading his post. It just confirmed that a consortium is not for me Aussies or not, would rather an individual like Dalman buying us.
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    MartinCAFC said:
    Personally I don't want a consortium at the club Aussies or not, consortiums are pulled together because one person outright can't afford to do the deal themself or isn't willing to even if they do have the money.

    The other problem with consortiums as is being reported are investors who then want out of the consortium what happens then? Would they retain all funds from the sale of a player to cover there costs like RD is doing? And also how would decisions be carried out if nobody had outright control? Sometimes you can have too many decision makers.

    I so wanted to LOL James Seed's earlier post when he said another investor has walked away but I didn't out of respect because he only passed on what he was told even if I did laugh when reading his post. It just confirmed that a consortium is not for me Aussies or not, would rather an individual like Dalman buying us.
    Consortium or Roland?

    I get your point, but this is not a better the devil you know scenario as Roland is just increasing our price week on week.
  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,734
    MartinCAFC said:
    Personally I don't want a consortium at the club Aussies or not, consortiums are pulled together because one person outright can't afford to do the deal themself or isn't willing to even if they do have the money.

    The other problem with consortiums as is being reported are investors who then want out of the consortium what happens then? Would they retain all funds from the sale of a player to cover there costs like RD is doing? And also how would decisions be carried out if nobody had outright control? Sometimes you can have too many decision makers.

    I so wanted to LOL James Seed's earlier post when he said another investor has walked away but I didn't out of respect because he only passed on what he was told even if I did laugh when reading his post. It just confirmed that a consortium is not for me Aussies or not, would rather an individual like Dalman buying us.
    I don't think Dalman would be the sole owner either. 
  • MartinCAFC
    MartinCAFC Posts: 3,219
    edited July 2019
    Dazzler21 said:
    MartinCAFC said:
    Personally I don't want a consortium at the club Aussies or not, consortiums are pulled together because one person outright can't afford to do the deal themself or isn't willing to even if they do have the money.

    The other problem with consortiums as is being reported are investors who then want out of the consortium what happens then? Would they retain all funds from the sale of a player to cover there costs like RD is doing? And also how would decisions be carried out if nobody had outright control? Sometimes you can have too many decision makers.

    I so wanted to LOL James Seed's earlier post when he said another investor has walked away but I didn't out of respect because he only passed on what he was told even if I did laugh when reading his post. It just confirmed that a consortium is not for me Aussies or not, would rather an individual like Dalman buying us.
    Consortium or Roland?

    I get your point, but this is not a better the devil you know scenario as Roland is just increasing our price week on week.
    If a consortium could raise enough cash for a 3-5 year plan with a guarantee of no further investment required then I'd take my chances with a consortium over Roland any day.

    But we come back to the money, if it's not there I'd rather wait a bit longer for someone with secure money to buy the club. At least however bad Roland is the money is there and administration isn't going to happen, something I fear could well be a threat with a consortium.
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    MartinCAFC said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    MartinCAFC said:
    Personally I don't want a consortium at the club Aussies or not, consortiums are pulled together because one person outright can't afford to do the deal themself or isn't willing to even if they do have the money.

    The other problem with consortiums as is being reported are investors who then want out of the consortium what happens then? Would they retain all funds from the sale of a player to cover there costs like RD is doing? And also how would decisions be carried out if nobody had outright control? Sometimes you can have too many decision makers.

    I so wanted to LOL James Seed's earlier post when he said another investor has walked away but I didn't out of respect because he only passed on what he was told even if I did laugh when reading his post. It just confirmed that a consortium is not for me Aussies or not, would rather an individual like Dalman buying us.
    Consortium or Roland?

    I get your point, but this is not a better the devil you know scenario as Roland is just increasing our price week on week.
    If a consortium could raise enough cash for a 3-5 year plan with a guarantee of no further investment required then I'd take my chances with a consortium over Roland any day.

    But we come back to the money, if it's not there I'd rather wait a bit longer for someone with secure money to buy the club. At least however bad Roland is the money is there and administration isn't going to happen, something I fear could well be a threat with a consortium.
    But the price keeps going up. The deluded fool believes he'll make his money back!
  • Rudders22
    Rudders22 Posts: 3,864
    Bit concerned now. We have not see NLA or Prague for ages. Have they been hijacked?
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,221
    MartinCAFC said:
    Personally I don't want a consortium at the club Aussies or not, consortiums are pulled together because one person outright can't afford to do the deal themself or isn't willing to even if they do have the money.

    The other problem with consortiums as is being reported are investors who then want out of the consortium what happens then? Would they retain all funds from the sale of a player to cover there costs like RD is doing? And also how would decisions be carried out if nobody had outright control? Sometimes you can have too many decision makers.

    I so wanted to LOL James Seed's earlier post when he said another investor has walked away but I didn't out of respect because he only passed on what he was told even if I did laugh when reading his post. It just confirmed that a consortium is not for me Aussies or not, would rather an individual like Dalman buying us.
    Dalman would most likely have been fronting a consortium.  It's unlikely he is wealthy enough in his own right.
  • LTKapal
    LTKapal Posts: 1,312
    edited July 2019
    Happyvalley is late and we are too far invested to not do this now so I'll add one. 

     1942: Then Princess and future Queen of the United Kingdom, Princess Elizabeth  registers for war service. 
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”