Said yesterday what I'd do. Send them an email saying if we hadn't heard back by 5pm today then we assume all is good to go & he'd be playing on Saturday. End of.
Can't imagine the point deduction or fine would be an issue at all.
Said yesterday what I'd do. Send them an email saying if we hadn't heard back by 5pm today then we assume all is good to go & he'd be playing on Saturday. End of.
Can't imagine the point deduction or fine would be an issue at all.
10 points....ok, so we go up as runner ups not champions
Said yesterday what I'd do. Send them an email saying if we hadn't heard back by 5pm today then we assume all is good to go & he'd be playing on Saturday. End of.
Can't imagine the point deduction or fine would be an issue at all.
More like 3 points (maybe even more).....at the moment the ref blew his whistle to get the game under way, even if he was on the subs bench.
How about Brighton cancelled his contract and his new contract is of a different duration - possibly longer - and therefore needs re registering rather than just transferring and whatever permit malarkey there might be associated with it ? That and possibly the efl or fa shouldn’t have cancelled one registration before confirming the new one, particularly if the new one was submitted 35 seconds late???
Probably find the EFL rang back to confirm, got the NHS helpline and received a prescription for preparation H by return. "Sorry its a bad line... did you say you've just got Hemered? We've got just thing for that!"
Probably find the EFL rang back to confirm, got the NHS helpline and received a prescription for preparation H by return. "Sorry its a bad line... did you say you've just got Hemered? We've got just thing for that!"
While we don't know if Hemed is officially on our payroll, if he is not, and things are not settled by 12am tomorrow, potentially Hemed has been excluded from three matches, one which we lost on penalties preventing a lucrative tie against a Prem team and the chance to progress in a cup. Hemed may have lost wages and win bonuses. All because the football authorities could not make s timely decision.
If they were too tied up with Bolton, Bury, and Macclesfield, they passed the owners as fit and proper persons.
While we don't know if Hemed is officially on our payroll, if he is not, and things are not settled by 12am tomorrow, potentially Hemed has been excluded from three matches, one which we lost on penalties preventing a lucrative tie against a Prem team and the chance to progress in a cup. Hemed may have lost wages and win bonuses. All because the football authorities could not make s timely decision.
If they were too tied up with Bolton, Bury, and Macclesfield, they passed the owners as fit and proper persons.
Bournemouth A in the 2nd round of the Carabao Cup cannot in all reasonableness be described as lucrative. Unless you're suggesting we were going to draw Man U or Arsenal.
Said yesterday what I'd do. Send them an email saying if we hadn't heard back by 5pm today then we assume all is good to go & he'd be playing on Saturday. End of.
Can't imagine the point deduction or fine would be an issue at all.
More like 3 points (maybe even more).....at the moment the ref blew his whistle to get the game under way, even if he was on the subs bench.
It would get their bloody attention though. I bet they'd be onto us that evening.
You have to throw the stone to get the pond to ripple......to quote a couple of famous Charlton boys.
The point being, is that unless we proactively do something then the EFL can just sit on this.
While we don't know if Hemed is officially on our payroll, if he is not, and things are not settled by 12am tomorrow, potentially Hemed has been excluded from three matches, one which we lost on penalties preventing a lucrative tie against a Prem team and the chance to progress in a cup. Hemed may have lost wages and win bonuses. All because the football authorities could not make s timely decision.
If they were too tied up with Bolton, Bury, and Macclesfield, they passed the owners as fit and proper persons.
Bournemouth A in the 2nd round of the Carabao Cup cannot in all reasonableness be described as lucrative. Unless you're suggesting we were going to draw Man U or Arsenal.
C End, the point is the draw was against a Prem side. EFL don't know how many would turn up, nor do they care how much revenue we potentially lost. They delayed a decision, depriving us if a goalscorer, with no reason or transparency
If the case was cut and dried we'd surely have heard something by now. Maybe the EFL know they're on shaky ground and no decision is the safest option while they figure out how to avoid Roland taking legal action.
How about Brighton cancelled his contract and his new contract is of a different duration - possibly longer - and therefore needs re registering rather than just transferring and whatever permit malarkey there might be associated with it ? That and possibly the efl or fa shouldn’t have cancelled one registration before confirming the new one, particularly if the new one was submitted 35 seconds late???
How about Brighton cancelled his contract and his new contract is of a different duration - possibly longer - and therefore needs re registering rather than just transferring and whatever permit malarkey there might be associated with it ? That and possibly the efl or fa shouldn’t have cancelled one registration before confirming the new one, particularly if the new one was submitted 35 seconds late???
Every full signing is a transfer of contract.
Yes but the problem is with the registration, not the contract?
How about Brighton cancelled his contract and his new contract is of a different duration - possibly longer - and therefore needs re registering rather than just transferring and whatever permit malarkey there might be associated with it ? That and possibly the efl or fa shouldn’t have cancelled one registration before confirming the new one, particularly if the new one was submitted 35 seconds late???
Every full signing is a transfer of contract.
Yes but the problem is with the registration, not the contract?
Wouldn’t be a problem if Brighton cancelled his contract so that’s incorrect. It’s also wrong that you just transfer a contract to another club unless it’s a loan.
"BBC Sport has learned that the FA told Charlton the club had not communicated the player's contract extension in a way that fully complied with the FA's system, rules and regulations."
This is per Kit Graham's "free transfer" to Spurs; do communication issues pervade the whole Charlton family?
Comments
is it the EFL hitting back at our owners recent statement.
"Sorry its a bad line... did you say you've just got Hemered? We've got just thing for that!"
And have no senior management team in place to oversee things like this.
Where's our CEO Living On De Ceiling?
Can't sell the club, can't do anything the incompent waste of space.
If not you are indeed missing something. 17:00:59 is after 17:00.
If they were too tied up with Bolton, Bury, and Macclesfield, they passed the owners as fit and proper persons.
Unless you're suggesting we were going to draw Man U or Arsenal.
You have to throw the stone to get the pond to ripple......to quote a couple of famous Charlton boys.
The point being, is that unless we proactively do something then the EFL can just sit on this.
This is per Kit Graham's "free transfer" to Spurs; do communication issues pervade the whole Charlton family?