Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Ronnie Schwartz (Page 73 - contract cancelled)
Comments
-
Airman Brown said:Not involved tonight.1
-
Ferryman said:Airman Brown said:Not involved tonight.0
-
Ferryman said:Airman Brown said:Not involved tonight.
Even if it is for MH reasons.....or for any other reason for that matter, then why not just say & be done with it. We can then all move on. I thought we were all "sympathetic" towards MH issues nowdays......this to me is just going back 30 years where it's all hushed up & the person is sent into therapy.0 -
Yeaaaaaaa.. Bye Ronnie - Not involved tonight at all0
-
golfaddick said:Ferryman said:Airman Brown said:Not involved tonight.
Even if it is for MH reasons.....or for any other reason for that matter, then why not just say & be done with it. We can then all move on. I thought we were all "sympathetic" towards MH issues nowdays......this to me is just going back 30 years where it's all hushed up & the person is sent into therapy.0 -
If he's not going to play then move him on.0
-
As fans we should be told why a player brought in under the assumption he scores goals for fun hasn’t had a look in. We’ve waited long enough.2
-
Don’t be surprised if he ends up back at his former club - put me on the list dazzler !!!3
-
DOUCHER said:Don’t be surprised if he ends up back at his former club - put me on the list dazzler !!!1
-
Obviously don't know what happens behind closed doors but sorta feel sorry for the guy would have liked to have seen him giving a chance to prove himself4
- Sponsored links:
-
Disappointing. Really hoped he would play tonight and stake a claim to be involved with the first team again.2
-
Well, unless he does have some mental health demons that are stopping him from coming into work, that is that for The Minister for Goals and Charlton. A shame it didn't work out, and kind of hard to explain as well because there is no way the Danish Premier League is sub League One standard,
1 -
Lazy_eye_metaphor said:Ferryman said:Airman Brown said:Not involved tonight.2
-
'Someone should do it but it definitely won't be me!'
Feel like it's a very tongue in cheek comment of course.4 -
If he had COVID, then wouldn’t he be around the same recovery time as Gilbey?1
-
If he had covid why would they keep it quiet0
-
shuffles67 said:If he had covid why would they keep it quiet3
-
Don’t care what the story is, I hope he’s off and stops draining the club of a desperately needed wage.0
-
As it stands if he isnt going to play, we have 2 strikers & Davison who hardly pulled up trees in League 2 last season. Elliot Lee might be ok, but I don't believe he is an out & out striker.0
- Sponsored links:
-
golfaddick said:As it stands if he isnt going to play, we have 2 strikers & Davison who hardly pulled up trees in League 2 last season. Elliot Lee might be ok, but I don't believe he is an out & out striker.0
-
People are reading in to this far to much. Its pretty obvious whats happening here, we are saving him for the knock out stages of the pizza cup6
-
Cafc43v3r said:golfaddick said:As it stands if he isnt going to play, we have 2 strikers & Davison who hardly pulled up trees in League 2 last season. Elliot Lee might be ok, but I don't believe he is an out & out striker.0
-
I think it’s 100% Adkins decision to freeze him out. I reckon he wanted rid from the off to free up wages and is making a point that he isn’t part of his plans.
2 -
On the bright side, at least TS isn't forcing this vanity signing on Adkins.
I would have expected him to feature tonight though, so would expect something is definitely "wrong" outside of "not good enough."2 -
Thing is that the money spent on Ronnie could have made all the difference in getting a player over the line like Lowery, or the lad from St Johnstone. Not TS's finest hour this one.4
-
DamoNorthStand said:Thing is that the money spent on Ronnie could have made all the difference in getting a player over the line like Lowery, or the lad from St Johnstone. Not TS's finest hour this one.
More the fact that we'll only pay what we think a player is worth, which is the right approach.13 -
ForeverAddickted said:DamoNorthStand said:Thing is that the money spent on Ronnie could have made all the difference in getting a player over the line like Lowery, or the lad from St Johnstone. Not TS's finest hour this one.
More the fact that we'll only pay what we think a player is worth, which is the right approach.4 -
SELR_addicks said:ForeverAddickted said:DamoNorthStand said:Thing is that the money spent on Ronnie could have made all the difference in getting a player over the line like Lowery, or the lad from St Johnstone. Not TS's finest hour this one.
More the fact that we'll only pay what we think a player is worth, which is the right approach.
Would it still be the right approach?4 -
DamoNorthStand said:Thing is that the money spent on Ronnie could have made all the difference in getting a player over the line like Lowery, or the lad from St Johnstone. Not TS's finest hour this one.3