Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)
Comments
-
Danny_Jenner said:I’m slightly disappointed we didn’t get Simms (Ex Southampton) but happy enough with the players we brought in that position0
-
LargeAddick said:bit surprised there has not been something today from Nigel welcoming yesterdays new signings, saying how pleased he is with his final squad, etc etc
After working past midnight last night and getting home much later, I wouldn't begrudge Nigel Adkins a day off today?1 -
Raelynn asking for feedback0
-
Window ended up good i would say - i'm reliably informed that TS spent £2m on transfer fees, loan fees and agents fees and we were trying to buy Leko as well but couldn't agree fee - something that might happen further down the line - i'd like to see a big ovation for TS when he next attends the Valley77
-
As has been stated already, TS probably doubled (or close to doubled) his budget on the fly. He genuinely cares, and he genuinely wants to be liked as well, both of which will serve us well16
-
DOUCHER said:Window ended up good i would say - i'm reliably informed that TS spent £2m on transfer fees, loan fees and agents fees and we were trying to buy Leko as well but couldn't agree fee - something that might happen further down the line - i'd like to see a big ovation for TS when he next attends the Valley2
-
when, if at all, are the squads announced?0
-
I'm not convinced that he suddenly doubled the budget as wasn't the plan always to buy quite a few close to the end of the window? It may have cost us some points but i'm genuinely excited to see some of the pace and 'ballers' that we've brought in to compliment what we had - looks a good blend to me.14
-
DOUCHER said:I'm not convinced that he suddenly doubled the budget as wasn't the plan always to buy quite a few close to the end of the window? It may have cost us some points but i'm genuinely excited to see some of the pace and 'ballers' that we've brought in to compliment what we had - looks a good blend to me.0
-
addick1956 said:cafcfan1990 said:addick1956 said:cafcfan1990 said:thenewbie said:orpingtonRED said:cafcfan1990 said:orpingtonRED said:felix_31 said:orpingtonRED said:felix_31 said:In my opinion... Great window. Strong team. Spent well over £1,000,000 signing young, talented, motivated players on long term contracts. Also signed players with links to CAFC (Lee, Arter, Leko & Clare) and signed natural leaders and players of the season (Lavelle Kirk & MacG). I also think the temperament of the players we've brought in has been well thought through.
Whats not to like? Yes, we might be a LB or a ST short, but I reckon we might dip into the free transfer market to plug whatever minute holes there might be.
Finally, a sensible window, not one where our sole target is to bring In 'bodies.'
I will go Charlton and support the team as Always but I'm not expecting us to be anywhere near the play-offs.
I think this is a below average squad.
I hope I am wrong I honestly do.
Playing some youngsters through the season will keep me interested and then mount a challenge next season. I'm not in a rush for promotion like others
I've no problem with that.
But this squad compared to Sheff Wd, Sunderland,Ipswich even Oxford, we won't be challenging7 - Sponsored links:
-
Leuth said:DOUCHER said:I'm not convinced that he suddenly doubled the budget as wasn't the plan always to buy quite a few close to the end of the window? It may have cost us some points but i'm genuinely excited to see some of the pace and 'ballers' that we've brought in to compliment what we had - looks a good blend to me.0
-
It seemed early on that we were missing out on players who went from leagues 1 and 2 to the Championship.
That suggested to me that we were always planning to spend but just not enough for the market we thought we were in. We misjudged that market and also didn't realise how much Ipswich and Wigan would distort the league 1 market.
So the expectations were set high for some fans and maybe even for Adkins and weren't delivered early on, at least.
There is a danger that the "perceived wisdom" has shifted from "he's skint" to "he's playing moneyball" to now "he upped the budget late on due to results" when there is not a whole lot of evidence to back up any of those positions fully. There is also some evidence that we'd expected do business late all along bit that could also be making a virtue out of a necessity.
The truth, as usual, is probably somewhere in between the extremes.
He's not skint but he's not going to spend, spend, spend.
He's not playing moneyball but he knows that buy low, sell high is a business concept that works in every business. He wants sustainable and affordable growth because while he's not skint or a liar he's not an oil state either.
He, and possibly Roddy, may have been over ambitious and they might well have tweeked the budget but did they really double it?
34 -
DOUCHER said:I'm not convinced that he suddenly doubled the budget as wasn't the plan always to buy quite a few close to the end of the window? It may have cost us some points but i'm genuinely excited to see some of the pace and 'ballers' that we've brought in to compliment what we had - looks a good blend to me.
2 -
Scoham said:Raelynn asking for feedback1
-
Well that didn't fail, first comment was some div moaning about his song still.
Ah shit @Henry Irving sorry, didn't mean to call you a div1 -
Sandgaard has now made some great signings for talented youngsters, all of whom could be worth a lot more in years to come.Kirk aged 23 for £400k on 4 year deal
DJ aged 22 for £300k on 3.5 year deal
Lavelle aged 24 for £200k on 3 year deal
Above fees are estimates as I’m not sure exactly what we paid in the end.18 -
stoneroses19 said:Sandgaard has now made some great signings for talented youngsters, all of whom could be worth a lot more in years to come.Kirk aged 23 for £400k on 4 year deal
DJ aged 22 for £300k on 3.5 year deal
Lavelle aged 24 for £200k on 3 year deal
Above fees are estimates as I’m not sure exactly what we paid in the end.25 -
shine166 said:Well that didn't fail, first comment was some div moaning about his song still.
Ah shit @Henry Irving sorry, didn't mean to call you a divDecent window, like everyone I was surprised by the lack of left back, but we are where we are.Still a lot of options for contract extensions next year, but I’d say an improvement that next year we shouldn’t have to be making quite so many changes and be recruiting either from a settled squad or because we’re in a new division.1 -
Re the LB I think NA rates Purrington and wants him as his first choice. Clubs expect loan players to get game time and with Purrington nearing fitness perhaps NA thought this a waste. Think we may look at free agents and get one in as a back up and bench warmer.1
- Sponsored links:
-
Purrington is a good player at this level.1
-
DOUCHER said:Window ended up good i would say - i'm reliably informed that TS spent £2m on transfer fees, loan fees and agents fees and we were trying to buy Leko as well but couldn't agree fee - something that might happen further down the line - i'd like to see a big ovation for TS when he next attends the Valley0
-
I think with the left back, Purrington is not considered injury prone. As for the signings overall, it feels like some rabbits have been pulled out of the hat. We like a good argument on here, but nobody could argue too much on our starting eleven and the bench was weak. That has changed and there are some difficult decisions for Adkins which is what he wants. Let's see how it goes.1
-
My issue after this window is we have all been completely drained by the constant rows throughout the last month or so.
I dread to think of the rows kicking off after the team announcements every game from now on when you look at the players that are not even going to get on the bench lol NA will be a total idiot everytime he names his squad lol2 -
stoneroses19 said:Sandgaard has now made some great signings for talented youngsters, all of whom could be worth a lot more in years to come.Kirk aged 23 for £400k on 4 year deal
DJ aged 22 for £300k on 3.5 year deal
Lavelle aged 24 for £200k on 3 year deal
Above fees are estimates as I’m not sure exactly what we paid in the end.0 -
AndyG said:My issue after this window is we have all been completely drained by the constant rows throughout the last month or so.
I dread to think of the rows kicking off after the team announcements every game from now on when you look at the players that are not even going to get on the bench lol NA will be a total idiot everytime he names his squad lol
Literally social media (including here) regarding Schwartz6 -
Cafc43v3r said:stoneroses19 said:Sandgaard has now made some great signings for talented youngsters, all of whom could be worth a lot more in years to come.Kirk aged 23 for £400k on 4 year deal
DJ aged 22 for £300k on 3.5 year deal
Lavelle aged 24 for £200k on 3 year deal
Above fees are estimates as I’m not sure exactly what we paid in the end.
And to an extent, what we've ended up doing, whether out of choice or necessity, is buy players who are under contract. If we'd signed more free agent players (the likes of Taylor, Aneke, Lockyer), then the transfer fees would have been lower, but wages and signing on fees higher.0 -
Going to be an exciting place if we don’t hit form soon however. Let’s get to Jan without complaints shall we? The only arguable one is no LB so let’s see how it affects us.1
-
shine166 said:Well that didn't fail, first comment was some div moaning about his song still.
Ah shit @Henry Irving sorry, didn't mean to call you a div
and you are right, he is a div1 -
BTW I like the 'Addicks to Victory' song but then I would listen to any song about CAFC but a big shout out to TS for saving the club and genuinely caring.9
This discussion has been closed.