Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
A question re Stockley’s suspension.

SoundAsa£
Posts: 22,477
Sorry if this has been touched upon elsewhere.
Straight red of course means an immediate automatic three match suspension, however I’m wondering if there are any cup matches that can be included in those three games?
Straight red of course means an immediate automatic three match suspension, however I’m wondering if there are any cup matches that can be included in those three games?
2
Comments
-
Rich Cawley tweeted during the game yesterday that it'll be the three League games0
-
ForeverAddickted said:Rich Cawley tweeted during the game yesterday that it'll be the three League games0
-
SoundAsa£ said:ForeverAddickted said:Rich Cawley tweeted during the game yesterday that it'll be the three League games32
-
He'll come back get booked in his first game back and be suspended for the next match.1
-
So he can play in the cup game ?0
-
Bedsaddick said:So he can play in the cup game ?0
-
The next 3 games we play are all league games anyway, so it's academic
7 -
killerandflash said:The next 3 games we play are all league games anyway, so it's academic
Anyway, it’s confirmed it’ll be three league games.0 -
Plymouth (H)
Morecambe (A)
Shrewsbury (A)1 -
Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him1
- Sponsored links:
-
bolloxbolder said:He'll come back get booked in his first game back and be suspended for the next match.1
-
Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him2
-
Did fine without him on Saturday. As good a presence as he is in the air (especially defensively), I think Davison offers more in is ability to hold up the ball and link up with others. Be interesting to see how Josh and Connor do up top together this Saturday.6
-
That's actually a good basic point that sometimes can be forgotten. We won and scored on Saturday without him for 75mins. Take that as a positive.2
-
We have appealed it.2
-
Cafc43v3r said:We have appealed it.That is the Charlton way 😀8
-
valleynick66 said:Cafc43v3r said:We have appealed it.That is the Charlton way 😀0
-
Surprised we’ve appealed it7
-
2 hopes. Bob and no4
-
When will the appeal be heard? Is it possible we are appealing so we have him available Saturday for Plymouth1
- Sponsored links:
-
cafcdave123 said:When will the appeal be heard? Is it possible we are appealing so we have him available Saturday for Plymouth1
-
killerandflash said:cafcdave123 said:When will the appeal be heard? Is it possible we are appealing so we have him available Saturday for Plymouth3
-
cafcdave123 said:killerandflash said:cafcdave123 said:When will the appeal be heard? Is it possible we are appealing so we have him available Saturday for PlymouthIf it doesn’t get overturned (which is almost a certainty) then Stockley could get the ban extended for the incorrect appeal.0
-
killerandflash said:cafcdave123 said:When will the appeal be heard? Is it possible we are appealing so we have him available Saturday for Plymouth3
-
ElliotCAFC said:cafcdave123 said:killerandflash said:cafcdave123 said:When will the appeal be heard? Is it possible we are appealing so we have him available Saturday for PlymouthIf it doesn’t get overturned (which is almost a certainty) then Stockley could get the ban extended for the incorrect appeal.1
-
I can't believe we have appealed this. Absolutely zero chance of it getting overturned.6
-
The only angle shown on the Quest program shows Stockley swinging an arm.
There was no clear angle on our reject defender's initial transgression.
Anybody who knows anything at all about football knows Stockers was trying to shrug off Oshilaja's attentions (more of which anon) and that wasn't any sort of attempt to whack the bloke behind him.
Sadly the EFL have no interest in the facts, nor any fundamental knowledge or care for the integrity of the game and will misuse the one bit of footage to back up the risible Kettle's mishandling of events.
There is no realistic possibility of the red card being overturned. There is some chance the 3 game ban will be extended, for the temerity of challenging the appointed official's decision.
Kettle didn't have a clear sight of either player's actions. The linesman however did. We could reasonably surmise that Kettle's decision relied on the lino's input.
Bafflingly the lino had an unimpeded view of Oshilaja grabbing hold of Stockley, never watching the ball, impeding his movement into the box and near enough pulling his shirt off. Lino didn't react til they were in a heap on the floor.
It was the most blatant penalty I've seen in a game all season.
Lino either bottled it (he never gave the flag across the chest signal) or Kettle overruled him on the basis of ego/prejudice.
JJ's comments on the incident are reasonable and fair. None of which will count for anything in the EFL sham proceedings.2 -
cafcdave123 said:ElliotCAFC said:cafcdave123 said:killerandflash said:cafcdave123 said:When will the appeal be heard? Is it possible we are appealing so we have him available Saturday for PlymouthIf it doesn’t get overturned (which is almost a certainty) then Stockley could get the ban extended for the incorrect appeal.Can’t imagine the powers at be will take 5 days to review that incident. After all, their processes are notoriously fast and efficient…4
-
cafcdave123 said:ElliotCAFC said:cafcdave123 said:killerandflash said:cafcdave123 said:When will the appeal be heard? Is it possible we are appealing so we have him available Saturday for PlymouthIf it doesn’t get overturned (which is almost a certainty) then Stockley could get the ban extended for the incorrect appeal.0
-
ElliotCAFC said:cafcdave123 said:ElliotCAFC said:cafcdave123 said:killerandflash said:cafcdave123 said:When will the appeal be heard? Is it possible we are appealing so we have him available Saturday for PlymouthIf it doesn’t get overturned (which is almost a certainty) then Stockley could get the ban extended for the incorrect appeal.Can’t imagine the powers at be will take 5 days to review that incident. After all, their processes are notoriously fast and efficient…3