Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
A question re Stockley’s suspension.
Comments
-
Thanks . No mention of it from Jacko1
-
Bedsaddick said:Thanks . No mention of it from Jacko2
-
Plymouth site says the appeal was unsuccessful.
https://www.pafc.co.uk/news/attention-turns-charlton
4 -
shirty5 said:Bedsaddick said:addick1956 said:ForeverAddickted said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him2
-
EugenesAxe said:Belv said:EugenesAxe said:soapboxsam said:Stockley is scoring more goals than at any time in his career and with Jackson preferring a strike partner for Jayden then I see no reason he shouldn't continue but he may have to reign in his game a tad as his reputation is going before him.
Easy mistake to make.
I didn’t expect some sort of Spanish Inquisition…4 -
Why the secrecy? Are they continuing the trend of our transfer policy with no leaks!0
-
MuttleyCAFC said:JJ said both Washington and Gunter are both fine.1
-
Jonniesta said:Plymouth site says the appeal was unsuccessful.
https://www.pafc.co.uk/news/attention-turns-charlton0 -
Love it how Plymouth know & report it but its oh so secret we arent allowed to know.
Ha ha ha ha ha.0 -
golfaddick said:Jonniesta said:Plymouth site says the appeal was unsuccessful.
https://www.pafc.co.uk/news/attention-turns-charlton0 - Sponsored links:
-
Possible they've just got that off our OS
0 -
MattF said:Possible they've just got that off our OS0
-
Well their article specifically says that the appeal failed.
But of course, Jackson wouldn't be lying about not knowing about it before last night.....would he?0 -
shirty5 said:RonnieMoore said:golfaddick said:RonnieMoore said:The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment
Doesn't seem right to me somehow. I bet people would be bleating if it were the other way round & we were waiting on a decision by the EFL regarding a Plymouth player.
What's happened to transparency.3 -
As I said above, a downgrade to a yellow would still mean a suspension tomorrow anyway0
-
A suspension from Tuesday night has been overturned but nothing about Stockley as yet0
-
Miserableoldgit said:shirty5 said:RonnieMoore said:golfaddick said:RonnieMoore said:The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment
Doesn't seem right to me somehow. I bet people would be bleating if it were the other way round & we were waiting on a decision by the EFL regarding a Plymouth player.
What's happened to transparency.0 -
The pre match review on the OS says that both Stockley and Famewo are suspended for this game.0
-
addick1956 said:LargeAddick said:addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him
12 -
addick1956 said:LargeAddick said:addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him1
- Sponsored links:
-
addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him
4 -
addick1956 said:LargeAddick said:addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him
The window being "crap" is very debatable even now and saying it in July was in fact talking bollocks as is now rather evident.9 -
thenewbie said:addick1956 said:LargeAddick said:addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him
The window being "crap" is very debatable even now and saying it in July was in fact talking bollocks as is now rather evident.3 -
addick1956 said:Wheresmeticket? said:addick1956 said:LargeAddick said:addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him11
-
Don't feed the troll6
-
Wankers will wank.3
-
addick1956 said:tangoflash said:addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him
4 -
addick1956 said:Wheresmeticket? said:addick1956 said:LargeAddick said:addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him3
-
addick1956 said:RonnieMoore said:golfaddick said:RonnieMoore said:The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment
Doesn't seem right to me somehow. I bet people would be bleating if it were the other way round & we were waiting on a decision by the EFL regarding a Plymouth player.
What's happened to transparency.
Either way, we need to prepare based on being with and without Stockley.0 -
addick1956 said:Wheresmeticket? said:addick1956 said:LargeAddick said:addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without himaddick1956 said:tangoflash said:addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him0