Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
A question re Stockley’s suspension.
Comments
-
Belv said:EugenesAxe said:mendonca said:As Jacko says, it wasn't enough to keep 2 professionals from playing 3 league games. For themselves, the fans and club.
I want Stockley to look at himself after this a little though.
Indeed, his scoring seems to have been tailing off lately in favour of standing with his arms in the air or elbowing an opponent
Doesn’t seem that way.2 -
addick19 said:Croydon said:SoundAsa£ said:ElliotCAFC said:cafcdave123 said:ElliotCAFC said:cafcdave123 said:killerandflash said:cafcdave123 said:When will the appeal be heard? Is it possible we are appealing so we have him available Saturday for PlymouthIf it doesn’t get overturned (which is almost a certainty) then Stockley could get the ban extended for the incorrect appeal.Can’t imagine the powers at be will take 5 days to review that incident. After all, their processes are notoriously fast and efficient…
Was one of the Lads 6ft 4in with previous ?0 -
EugenesAxe said:Belv said:EugenesAxe said:mendonca said:As Jacko says, it wasn't enough to keep 2 professionals from playing 3 league games. For themselves, the fans and club.
I want Stockley to look at himself after this a little though.
Indeed, his scoring seems to have been tailing off lately in favour of standing with his arms in the air or elbowing an opponent
Doesn’t seem that way.3 -
Stockley is scoring more goals than at any time in his career and with Jackson preferring a strike partner for Jayden then I see no reason he shouldn't continue but he may have to reign in his game a tad as his reputation is going before him.0
-
Henry Irving said:EugenesAxe said:Belv said:EugenesAxe said:mendonca said:As Jacko says, it wasn't enough to keep 2 professionals from playing 3 league games. For themselves, the fans and club.
I want Stockley to look at himself after this a little though.
Indeed, his scoring seems to have been tailing off lately in favour of standing with his arms in the air or elbowing an opponent
Doesn’t seem that way.0 -
soapboxsam said:Stockley is scoring more goals than at any time in his career and with Jackson preferring a strike partner for Jayden then I see no reason he shouldn't continue but he may have to reign in his game a tad as his reputation is going before him.0
-
EugenesAxe said:soapboxsam said:Stockley is scoring more goals than at any time in his career and with Jackson preferring a strike partner for Jayden then I see no reason he shouldn't continue but he may have to reign in his game a tad as his reputation is going before him.
Easy mistake to make.5 -
I reckon the Club have heard with regard to both Stockley and Famewo but are keeping it quiet as long as possible to keep Plymouth guessing.3
-
Belv said:EugenesAxe said:soapboxsam said:Stockley is scoring more goals than at any time in his career and with Jackson preferring a strike partner for Jayden then I see no reason he shouldn't continue but he may have to reign in his game a tad as his reputation is going before him.
Easy mistake to make.
I didn’t expect some sort of Spanish Inquisition…1 -
LargeAddick said:I reckon the Club have heard with regard to both Stockley and Famewo but are keeping it quiet as long as possible to keep Plymouth guessing.
If Stockley's sending off is reduced to a yellow, won't he still be banned for 1 game as he'll have reached 5 yellows?1 - Sponsored links:
-
The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment0
-
Chunes said:I've read a few times people saying that Oshilaja wrestles Stockley to the ground... Is this rose-tinted specs because Stockley has got Deji in a headlock and swung him over his hip in a judo throw.0
-
RonnieMoore said:The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment
Doesn't seem right to me somehow. I bet people would be bleating if it were the other way round & we were waiting on a decision by the EFL regarding a Plymouth player.
What's happened to transparency.5 -
golfaddick said:RonnieMoore said:The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment
Doesn't seem right to me somehow. I bet people would be bleating if it were the other way round & we were waiting on a decision by the EFL regarding a Plymouth player.
What's happened to transparency.
Just assume he's missing for 3 games and if he's not, great.0 -
killerandflash said:LargeAddick said:I reckon the Club have heard with regard to both Stockley and Famewo but are keeping it quiet as long as possible to keep Plymouth guessing.
If Stockley's sending off is reduced to a yellow, won't he still be banned for 1 game as he'll have reached 5 yellows?
Yes, Stockley will miss Plymouth if it has been reduced to a yellow.0 -
golfaddick said:RonnieMoore said:The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment
Doesn't seem right to me somehow. I bet people would be bleating if it were the other way round & we were waiting on a decision by the EFL regarding a Plymouth player.
What's happened to transparency.0 -
Redrobo said:killerandflash said:LargeAddick said:I reckon the Club have heard with regard to both Stockley and Famewo but are keeping it quiet as long as possible to keep Plymouth guessing.
If Stockley's sending off is reduced to a yellow, won't he still be banned for 1 game as he'll have reached 5 yellows?
Yes, Stockley will miss Plymouth if it has been reduced to a yellow.0 -
RonnieMoore said:golfaddick said:RonnieMoore said:The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment
Doesn't seem right to me somehow. I bet people would be bleating if it were the other way round & we were waiting on a decision by the EFL regarding a Plymouth player.
What's happened to transparency.7 -
LargeAddick said:I reckon the Club have heard with regard to both Stockley and Famewo but are keeping it quiet as long as possible to keep Plymouth guessing.
I'd say its a smart play to keep it ambiguous, especially given Plymouth are not going to be an easy opponent either way.0 -
It’s about time ‘kettle is a twat’ became written into the laws as a valid reason for overturning a card3
- Sponsored links:
-
Think it points to Stockley missing1
-
addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him6
-
addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him4
-
JJ said both Washington and Gunter are both fine.3
-
RonnieMoore said:golfaddick said:RonnieMoore said:The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment
Doesn't seem right to me somehow. I bet people would be bleating if it were the other way round & we were waiting on a decision by the EFL regarding a Plymouth player.
What's happened to transparency.0 -
LargeAddick said:addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him11
-
addick1956 said:ForeverAddickted said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him
3 -
Fumbluff said:LargeAddick said:addick1956 said:LonelyNorthernAddick said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him1
-
addick1956 said:ForeverAddickted said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him0
-
Bedsaddick said:addick1956 said:ForeverAddickted said:addick1956 said:Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him
3