Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
A question re Stockley’s suspension.
Comments
-
Oh really , I stand corrected said the man in orthopaedic shoes!Belv said:
He scored 6 goals in the 7 games he played before Burton.EugenesAxe said:mendonca said:As Jacko says, it wasn't enough to keep 2 professionals from playing 3 league games. For themselves, the fans and club.
I want Stockley to look at himself after this a little though.
Indeed, his scoring seems to have been tailing off lately in favour of standing with his arms in the air or elbowing an opponent
Doesn’t seem that way.2 -
addick19 said:
'Fight?' I've seen two 5 year-olds scrap worse than that.Croydon said:
You can't fight on a football pitch.SoundAsa£ said:
Even bigger top shithousery that he got a red card in the first place…..it was a scuffle, over in a few seconds.ElliotCAFC said:
Top shithousery if he scores on Saturday.cafcdave123 said:
he's available until the appeal is heard so if they couldn't hear the appeal till next week, he could play saturdayElliotCAFC said:
It doesn’t work like that does it? As far as I’m aware, he’s definitely missing all 3 games until it’s overturned.cafcdave123 said:
I wouldn't be against us doing things like that, other clubs use these things to their advantageskillerandflash said:
That would be quite sneakycafcdave123 said:When will the appeal be heard? Is it possible we are appealing so we have him available Saturday for PlymouthIf it doesn’t get overturned (which is almost a certainty) then Stockley could get the ban extended for the incorrect appeal.Can’t imagine the powers at be will take 5 days to review that incident. After all, their processes are notoriously fast and efficient…
Was one of the Lads 6ft 4in with previous ?0 -
Didn't seem that way??????EugenesAxe said:
Oh really , I stand corrected said the man in orthopaedic shoes!Belv said:
He scored 6 goals in the 7 games he played before Burton.EugenesAxe said:mendonca said:As Jacko says, it wasn't enough to keep 2 professionals from playing 3 league games. For themselves, the fans and club.
I want Stockley to look at himself after this a little though.
Indeed, his scoring seems to have been tailing off lately in favour of standing with his arms in the air or elbowing an opponent
Doesn’t seem that way.3 -
Stockley is scoring more goals than at any time in his career and with Jackson preferring a strike partner for Jayden then I see no reason he shouldn't continue but he may have to reign in his game a tad as his reputation is going before him.0
-
Badly worded by me, I meant I’ve obviously overlooked it 😉Henry Irving said:
Didn't seem that way??????EugenesAxe said:
Oh really , I stand corrected said the man in orthopaedic shoes!Belv said:
He scored 6 goals in the 7 games he played before Burton.EugenesAxe said:mendonca said:As Jacko says, it wasn't enough to keep 2 professionals from playing 3 league games. For themselves, the fans and club.
I want Stockley to look at himself after this a little though.
Indeed, his scoring seems to have been tailing off lately in favour of standing with his arms in the air or elbowing an opponent
Doesn’t seem that way.0 -
This is what I should have said.soapboxsam said:Stockley is scoring more goals than at any time in his career and with Jackson preferring a strike partner for Jayden then I see no reason he shouldn't continue but he may have to reign in his game a tad as his reputation is going before him.0 -
So instead of saying that Stockley isn't scoring much, you should have said he's scoring loads.EugenesAxe said:
This is what I should have said.soapboxsam said:Stockley is scoring more goals than at any time in his career and with Jackson preferring a strike partner for Jayden then I see no reason he shouldn't continue but he may have to reign in his game a tad as his reputation is going before him.
Easy mistake to make.5 -
I reckon the Club have heard with regard to both Stockley and Famewo but are keeping it quiet as long as possible to keep Plymouth guessing.3
-
No the last bitBelv said:
So instead of saying that Stockley isn't scoring much, you should have said he's scoring loads.EugenesAxe said:
This is what I should have said.soapboxsam said:Stockley is scoring more goals than at any time in his career and with Jackson preferring a strike partner for Jayden then I see no reason he shouldn't continue but he may have to reign in his game a tad as his reputation is going before him.
Easy mistake to make.
I didn’t expect some sort of Spanish Inquisition…1 -
Famewo is out, there's no appeal for bookingsLargeAddick said:I reckon the Club have heard with regard to both Stockley and Famewo but are keeping it quiet as long as possible to keep Plymouth guessing.
If Stockley's sending off is reduced to a yellow, won't he still be banned for 1 game as he'll have reached 5 yellows?1 - Sponsored links:
-
The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment0
-
IPPON!Chunes said:I've read a few times people saying that Oshilaja wrestles Stockley to the ground... Is this rose-tinted specs because Stockley has got Deji in a headlock and swung him over his hip in a judo throw.0 -
Would it not be released officially somewhere ? Or is it like transfer embargoes where the EFL can just hush things up.RonnieMoore said:The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment
Doesn't seem right to me somehow. I bet people would be bleating if it were the other way round & we were waiting on a decision by the EFL regarding a Plymouth player.
What's happened to transparency.5 -
It's really not that a big of a deal. We'll find out some time tomorrow.golfaddick said:
Would it not be released officially somewhere ? Or is it like transfer embargoes where the EFL can just hush things up.RonnieMoore said:The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment
Doesn't seem right to me somehow. I bet people would be bleating if it were the other way round & we were waiting on a decision by the EFL regarding a Plymouth player.
What's happened to transparency.
Just assume he's missing for 3 games and if he's not, great.0 -
Yes there is. Mistaken identity is one.killerandflash said:
Famewo is out, there's no appeal for bookingsLargeAddick said:I reckon the Club have heard with regard to both Stockley and Famewo but are keeping it quiet as long as possible to keep Plymouth guessing.
If Stockley's sending off is reduced to a yellow, won't he still be banned for 1 game as he'll have reached 5 yellows?
Yes, Stockley will miss Plymouth if it has been reduced to a yellow.0 -
Richard Crawley been told not to print anythinggolfaddick said:
Would it not be released officially somewhere ? Or is it like transfer embargoes where the EFL can just hush things up.RonnieMoore said:The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment
Doesn't seem right to me somehow. I bet people would be bleating if it were the other way round & we were waiting on a decision by the EFL regarding a Plymouth player.
What's happened to transparency.0 -
I don't think we can use that one, and sadly Kettle being a tw*t isn't a valid appeal either!Redrobo said:
Yes there is. Mistaken identity is one.killerandflash said:
Famewo is out, there's no appeal for bookingsLargeAddick said:I reckon the Club have heard with regard to both Stockley and Famewo but are keeping it quiet as long as possible to keep Plymouth guessing.
If Stockley's sending off is reduced to a yellow, won't he still be banned for 1 game as he'll have reached 5 yellows?
Yes, Stockley will miss Plymouth if it has been reduced to a yellow.0 -
CawleyRonnieMoore said:
Richard Crawley been told not to print anythinggolfaddick said:
Would it not be released officially somewhere ? Or is it like transfer embargoes where the EFL can just hush things up.RonnieMoore said:The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment
Doesn't seem right to me somehow. I bet people would be bleating if it were the other way round & we were waiting on a decision by the EFL regarding a Plymouth player.
What's happened to transparency.7 -
Can't really argue with that approach either honestly. Facing a team with Stockley in it is a very different proposition to one without him. No Stockley also means a decent chance of a change of style and approach as we don't have another "big guy" striker and Washington/Davison have different strengths.LargeAddick said:I reckon the Club have heard with regard to both Stockley and Famewo but are keeping it quiet as long as possible to keep Plymouth guessing.
I'd say its a smart play to keep it ambiguous, especially given Plymouth are not going to be an easy opponent either way.0 -
It’s about time ‘kettle is a twat’ became written into the laws as a valid reason for overturning a card3
- Sponsored links:
-
Think it points to Stockley missing1
-
Why not? I was just highlighting the bit I was interested in... pretty standard behaviour on the forum by and large.addick1956 said:
Famewo is out . Don't type over my comment in bold. I read about Washington on a NI report which is why he didn't start.LonelyNorthernAddick said:
Where'd you hear this?addick1956 said:
You think ? Famewo is out for Plymouth and Washington apparently has a groin strain.Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him6 -
people highlight in bold to show the part of the post to which they are commenting on, that's all. As for Wash I very much doubt he had a groin strain and then still appeared, even if off the bench.addick1956 said:
Famewo is out . Don't type over my comment in bold. I read about Washington on a NI report which is why he didn't start.LonelyNorthernAddick said:
Where'd you hear this?addick1956 said:
You think ? Famewo is out for Plymouth and Washington apparently has a groin strain.Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him4 -
JJ said both Washington and Gunter are both fine.3
-
What, by the EFL ?RonnieMoore said:
Richard Crawley been told not to print anythinggolfaddick said:
Would it not be released officially somewhere ? Or is it like transfer embargoes where the EFL can just hush things up.RonnieMoore said:The club have been told the result .. but are keeping it in house at the moment
Doesn't seem right to me somehow. I bet people would be bleating if it were the other way round & we were waiting on a decision by the EFL regarding a Plymouth player.
What's happened to transparency.0 -
People highlight for all sorts of reasons, sometimes on the advice of their nan….LargeAddick said:
people highlight in bold to show the part of the post to which they are commenting on, that's all. As for Wash I very much doubt he had a groin strain and then still appeared, even if off the bench.addick1956 said:
Famewo is out . Don't type over my comment in bold. I read about Washington on a NI report which is why he didn't start.LonelyNorthernAddick said:
Where'd you hear this?addick1956 said:
You think ? Famewo is out for Plymouth and Washington apparently has a groin strain.Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him11 -
Sorry, Big Brother. I have been warned. I won't do it again.addick1956 said:
Please don't over write in block my comments.ForeverAddickted said:
Thats very sudden seeing that he played last night?addick1956 said:
You think ? Famewo is out for Plymouth and Washington apparently has a groin strain.Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him
3 -
CLASSIC POST!!!Fumbluff said:
People highlight for all sorts of reasons, sometimes on the advice of their nan….LargeAddick said:
people highlight in bold to show the part of the post to which they are commenting on, that's all. As for Wash I very much doubt he had a groin strain and then still appeared, even if off the bench.addick1956 said:
Famewo is out . Don't type over my comment in bold. I read about Washington on a NI report which is why he didn't start.LonelyNorthernAddick said:
Where'd you hear this?addick1956 said:
You think ? Famewo is out for Plymouth and Washington apparently has a groin strain.Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him1 -
Can you give us the link to where you read this?addick1956 said:
Please don't over write in block my comments. He didn't start because of a possible groin problem.ForeverAddickted said:
Thats very sudden seeing that he played last night?addick1956 said:
You think ? Famewo is out for Plymouth and Washington apparently has a groin strain.Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him0 -
https://www.bt.com/sport/news/2021/november/boss-ian-baraclough-savours-spot-on-display-after-northern-ireland-hold-italyBedsaddick said:
Can you give us the link to where you read this?addick1956 said:
Please don't over write in block my comments. He didn't start because of a possible groin problem.ForeverAddickted said:
Thats very sudden seeing that he played last night?addick1956 said:
You think ? Famewo is out for Plymouth and Washington apparently has a groin strain.Pelling1993 said:Plymouth is a bit of a bugger, but we should have more than enough to beat Morecambe & Salop without him
3
