Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Chuks Aneke - speculation re 2023/24 season (p60)
Comments
-
golfaddick said:Swisdom said:Chuks is fit now
he actually hoped to play last weekend
ladies and gents CHUKS IS BACK
Or he was hoping to be involved but wasn’t quite ready and missed out by a couple of days.0 -
I’d be amazed if we get more than 4 games out of him before he’s injured again5
-
Oh Eddie Youds... said:I’m amazed people don’t think Chuks will improve us. I get that his injuries are frustrating but he completely changes the way we play / attack when on the pitch.
Just need to hope we can get him on the pitch more often over the next 8 months.16 -
Weegie Addick said:Roll on Tuesday - Chuksy is back woah woah.0
-
Oh Eddie Youds... said:I’m amazed people don’t think Chuks will improve us. I get that his injuries are frustrating but he completely changes the way we play / attack when on the pitch.
Just need to hope we can get him on the pitch more often over the next 8 months.
Difference is that I would (probably) turn up once in a while.2 -
Will be pleased to see him back but have I missed the confirmation he is fit again? I thought he was still weeks away?0
-
JoshAddick said:Chuks is the exact type of player who will thrive in our set up. Can hold the ball up, run with the ball, take his chances, good with his feet and in the air. Obviously a HUGE ‘if’, but if he can stay fit for at least half of the remainder of the season it could be the difference for us.0
-
Croydon said:JoshAddick said:Chuks is the exact type of player who will thrive in our set up. Can hold the ball up, run with the ball, take his chances, good with his feet and in the air. Obviously a HUGE ‘if’, but if he can stay fit for at least half of the remainder of the season it could be the difference for us.0
-
Disappointed not to hear from Addick1936 on this matter*
* not really1 - Sponsored links:
-
Henry Irving said:Disappointed not to hear from Addick1936 on this matter*
* not really
Is he related to Addick1956 then?3 -
Addick Addict said:Henry Irving said:Disappointed not to hear from Addick1936 on this matter*
* not really
Is he related to Addick1956 then?4 -
JamesSeed said:Oh Eddie Youds... said:I’m amazed people don’t think Chuks will improve us. I get that his injuries are frustrating but he completely changes the way we play / attack when on the pitch.
Just need to hope we can get him on the pitch more often over the next 8 months.1 -
Whose place will he take on the bench0
-
Swisdom said:Chuks is fit now
he actually hoped to play last weekend
ladies and gents CHUKS IS BACK0 -
fit for Tuesday, likely unfit for next Saturday.1
-
My prediction is there will be a lot more 0/?? before we see him.0
-
Would expect to see Chuks in the full training pictures, but couldn't spot him.0
-
I would love to see Chuks get 10 to 15 goals this season.
However he’s been out injured so much of the last 12 months I’ve doubts he’ll be fit enough to score many at all.
Hope I’m wrong of course, often am.0 -
So in summary:
Our injury-prone part time striker may have recovered from his latest injury but will probably get injured again.2 - Sponsored links:
-
Really excited for Chuks to get going again. I have concerns, but he always adds something when he plays... Even if it's 10 minutes per game.4
-
whenever he's on the pitch we always look far more likely to score20
-
Bloody hell, the desperation ! All of us, including me, want this fella to put his fitness issues behind him but with the lack of forward power due to the transfer policy or lack of it, we now all hang our hopes on a player who will break down after two games.0
-
Unless Chucks stays fit for the rest of the season, whatever he offers (as good as he is) for the chunk of games he does play, will not come close to what we miss when he is not available.If we get 30-35 ‘games’ out of him then I’ll be more than happy. At the moment I’ll be surprised if we get more than 20, and that’s just not good enough.0
-
Bailey said:Bloody hell, the desperation ! All of us, including me, want this fella to put his fitness issues behind him but with the lack of forward power due to the transfer policy or lack of it, we now all hang our hopes on a player who will break down after two games.
We've seen how good he can be, we just want to see it again. And there's no harm in hoping when there's nothing else coming til January at the earliest.
If he doesn't do it or gets injured again, we continue as we were.3 -
Even when Chuks scores I'm somewhat surprised. Don't get me wrong, I'd love for him to become a top player / scorer, and with our other striker options that shouldn't be much of a task, but he has never convinced me.
Sadly our lack of quality up front has dwindled over the years, thus a player that can get into double figures for consecutive appearances, let alone goals, seems like a star player.
I genuinely believe that he has so much potential but also has so much to prove.
Question. Would any club BUY him if TS wanted to cut his losses, at least on wages alone?1 -
.1
-
The Prince-e-Paul said:Even when Chuks scores I'm somewhat surprised. Don't get me wrong, I'd love for him to become a top player / scorer, and with our other striker options that shouldn't be much of a task, but he has never convinced me.
Sadly our lack of quality up front has dwindled over the years, thus a player that can get into double figures for consecutive appearances, let alone goals, seems like a star player.
I genuinely believe that he has so much potential but also has so much to prove.
Question. Would any club BUY him if TS wanted to cut his losses, at least on wages alone?0 -
FishCostaFortune said:Unless Chucks stays fit for the rest of the season, whatever he offers (as good as he is) for the chunk of games he does play, will not come close to what we miss when he is not available.If we get 30-35 ‘games’ out of him then I’ll be more than happy. At the moment I’ll be surprised if we get more than 20, and that’s just not good enough.0
-
Would be great if he’s ready to feature tomorrow, or, failing that on Saturday.0
This discussion has been closed.