Her post doesn't mean Garner isn't signing. Cawley says he's agreed a 2 year deal. She says that's not correct. Doesn't mean he isn't signing, it could mean that he's agreed a 3 year deal!
Whatever the reason is, it now just winds everybody up and no one knows what is going on.
Would have been for the best if Mrs Sandgaard had not said a thing and we would have found out early this week what’s being announced.
Can’t understand why she would do that.
But if she knows the information to be false, then why can't she say anything? She's certainly closer to the deal makers than Cawley is.
Then do it through the official club channels.
For me it’s mainly the ambiguity of the statement. A tweet saying ‘Understand this not to be correct’ sounds like something you would hear RonnieMoore write on here.
It was in response to Cawley saying: "Understand that to be correct"
Could be any one detail that is incorrect, term, salary, structure etc
I have a feeling neither TS or Mrs TS appreciate Cawley reaching out to leaks in the club rather than contacting direct.
Her post doesn't mean Garner isn't signing. Cawley says he's agreed a 2 year deal. She says that's not correct. Doesn't mean he isn't signing, it could mean that he's agreed a 3 year deal!
Whatever the reason is, it now just winds everybody up and no one knows what is going on.
Would have been for the best if Mrs Sandgaard had not said a thing and we would have found out early this week what’s being announced.
Can’t understand why she would do that.
But if she knows the information to be false, then why can't she say anything? She's certainly closer to the deal makers than Cawley is.
Then do it through the official club channels.
Olly off for the Jubilee
Rubashow the same?
Yeah, only Avril the cleaner (a staunch republican) in and she ain't got the Twitter password
Her post doesn't mean Garner isn't signing. Cawley says he's agreed a 2 year deal. She says that's not correct. Doesn't mean he isn't signing, it could mean that he's agreed a 3 year deal!
Whatever the reason is, it now just winds everybody up and no one knows what is going on.
Would have been for the best if Mrs Sandgaard had not said a thing and we would have found out early this week what’s being announced.
Can’t understand why she would do that.
But if she knows the information to be false, then why can't she say anything? She's certainly closer to the deal makers than Cawley is.
Then do it through the official club channels.
For me it’s mainly the ambiguity of the statement. A tweet saying ‘Understand this not to be correct’ sounds like something you would hear RonnieMoore write on here.
It was in response to Cawley saying: "Understand that to be correct"
Could be any one detail that is incorrect, term, salary, structure etc
I have a feeling neither TS or Mrs TS appreciate Cawley reaching out to leaks in the club rather than contacting direct.
It’s amateurish. If they have an issue with anything Rich puts out they can very easily contact him privately or they can publish a statement via the club setting the record straight if necessary.
This smacks of “we’ll decide what is said and when” and that’s a battle they will never win.
More important, if you’re “still interviewing” five weeks after your own decision to remove the manager I’d suggest you have a bigger problem.
Weird how such boring football can lead to the most goals, shots, possession etc in the league.
Football fans are strange. On many occasions over the years i've seen people say that Pep's style of play is boring. A style of play that made Barcelona one of the best club sides in history, was the foundation of Spain winning 3 consecutive major tournaments and now Man City dominating domestic football.
It is subjective to many though what defines 'good football'. Whole thing depends on the players you have to how you can play and even if you look at the likes of Allardyce his teams attacked and had flare players in.
Her post doesn't mean Garner isn't signing. Cawley says he's agreed a 2 year deal. She says that's not correct. Doesn't mean he isn't signing, it could mean that he's agreed a 3 year deal!
Whatever the reason is, it now just winds everybody up and no one knows what is going on.
Would have been for the best if Mrs Sandgaard had not said a thing and we would have found out early this week what’s being announced.
Can’t understand why she would do that.
But if she knows the information to be false, then why can't she say anything? She's certainly closer to the deal makers than Cawley is.
Then do it through the official club channels.
For me it’s mainly the ambiguity of the statement. A tweet saying ‘Understand this not to be correct’ sounds like something you would hear RonnieMoore write on here.
It was in response to Cawley saying: "Understand that to be correct"
Could be any one detail that is incorrect, term, salary, structure etc
I have a feeling neither TS or Mrs TS appreciate Cawley reaching out to leaks in the club rather than contacting direct.
It’s amateurish. If they have an issue with anything Rich puts out they can very easily contact him privately or they can publish a statement via the club setting the record straight if necessary.
This smacks of “we’ll decide what is said and when” and that’s a battle they will never win.
More important, if you’re “still interviewing” five weeks after your own decision to remove the manager I’d suggest you have a bigger problem.
Exactly. It’s RC’s job as a journalist to dig into a story and break it to the readership. TS and his Mrs can’t stop that. The ‘we’ll decide what’s said and when’ is permeating society in general and it’s dangerous.
Journalists are becoming redundant because they’re being lumped in with cyber bullies and trolls. It’s their job to uncover the truth. From new Charlton managers to dodgy politicians.
Her post doesn't mean Garner isn't signing. Cawley says he's agreed a 2 year deal. She says that's not correct. Doesn't mean he isn't signing, it could mean that he's agreed a 3 year deal!
Whatever the reason is, it now just winds everybody up and no one knows what is going on.
Would have been for the best if Mrs Sandgaard had not said a thing and we would have found out early this week what’s being announced.
Can’t understand why she would do that.
But if she knows the information to be false, then why can't she say anything? She's certainly closer to the deal makers than Cawley is.
Then do it through the official club channels.
For me it’s mainly the ambiguity of the statement. A tweet saying ‘Understand this not to be correct’ sounds like something you would hear RonnieMoore write on here.
It was in response to Cawley saying: "Understand that to be correct"
Could be any one detail that is incorrect, term, salary, structure etc
I have a feeling neither TS or Mrs TS appreciate Cawley reaching out to leaks in the club rather than contacting direct.
It’s amateurish. If they have an issue with anything Rich puts out they can very easily contact him privately or they can publish a statement via the club setting the record straight if necessary.
This smacks of “we’ll decide what is said and when” and that’s a battle they will never win.
More important, if you’re “still interviewing” five weeks after your own decision to remove the manager I’d suggest you have a bigger problem.
Quantum physics can explain the situation very simply. At any given moment Garner has both signed and not signed. The more he has signed the less he has signed and obviously vice versa. I don’t get all the confusion.
Quantum physics can explain the situation very simply. At any given moment Garner has both signed and not signed. The more he has signed the less he has signed and obviously vice versa. I don’t get all the confusion.
Quantum mechanics is the meaning of life. The signing of Ben Garner can only happen when no one is watching. This is Heisenberg uncertainty principle meets Schrödinger's cat. Charlton's fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur.
Her post doesn't mean Garner isn't signing. Cawley says he's agreed a 2 year deal. She says that's not correct. Doesn't mean he isn't signing, it could mean that he's agreed a 3 year deal!
Whatever the reason is, it now just winds everybody up and no one knows what is going on.
Would have been for the best if Mrs Sandgaard had not said a thing and we would have found out early this week what’s being announced.
Can’t understand why she would do that.
But if she knows the information to be false, then why can't she say anything? She's certainly closer to the deal makers than Cawley is.
Then do it through the official club channels.
For me it’s mainly the ambiguity of the statement. A tweet saying ‘Understand this not to be correct’ sounds like something you would hear RonnieMoore write on here.
It was in response to Cawley saying: "Understand that to be correct"
Could be any one detail that is incorrect, term, salary, structure etc
I have a feeling neither TS or Mrs TS appreciate Cawley reaching out to leaks in the club rather than contacting direct.
It’s amateurish. If they have an issue with anything Rich puts out they can very easily contact him privately or they can publish a statement via the club setting the record straight if necessary.
This smacks of “we’ll decide what is said and when” and that’s a battle they will never win.
More important, if you’re “still interviewing” five weeks after your own decision to remove the manager I’d suggest you have a bigger problem.
It is unprofessional and opened them up to more criticism unfortunately. Can also see this coming back to bite them when every rumour is not denied like this.
Quantum physics can explain the situation very simply. At any given moment Garner has both signed and not signed. The more he has signed the less he has signed and obviously vice versa. I don’t get all the confusion.
Quantum mechanics is the meaning of life. The signing of Ben Garner can only happen when no one is watching. This is Heisenberg uncertainty principle meets Schrödinger's cat. Charlton's fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur.
So I've surfaced for my morning feed of the latest news only to find that a tweet has muddied the waters and Schrodinger's cat is stalking the shallows. Only on CL 🤣
It is unprofessional and opened them up to more criticism unfortunately. Can also see this coming back to bite them when every rumour is not denied like this.
Again, it's lose/lose whatever they do for some.
They shouldn't comment but if in future they don't comment that will also be wrong.
They are making non-committal non-denials. They mean very little as the tweets contain very little hard information but they are being poured over and far far too much being read into them by some.
It’s a month since JJ was sacked and TS must have made up his mind on that decision some time before. So, let’s be generous and say the owner has known he needs a new manager for two months.
He must have had an idea of who he wanted to take over but that has obviously not come to reality.
So, now, he is “still interviewing”. How many has he interviewed? How many are there still to interview? Get the feeling some interviewees are having second thoughts. If Mrs TS is right about Ben Garner, then are we going to end up with a fifth or. sixth choice as manager.
I will always appreciate TS saving our club but his handling of this situation is FUBAR.
It is unprofessional and opened them up to more criticism unfortunately. Can also see this coming back to bite them when every rumour is not denied like this.
Again, it's lose/lose whatever they do for some.
They shouldn't comment but if in future they don't comment that will also be wrong.
They are making non-committal non-denials. They mean very little as the tweets contain very little hard information but they are being poured over and far far too much being read into them by some.
Another post that's spot on.Just leave them alone. Whatever they do is wrong.Yes mistakes have been made but Thomas has the best intentions for the club.
It is unprofessional and opened them up to more criticism unfortunately. Can also see this coming back to bite them when every rumour is not denied like this.
Again, it's lose/lose whatever they do for some.
They shouldn't comment but if in future they don't comment that will also be wrong.
They are making non-committal non-denials. They mean very little as the tweets contain very little hard information but they are being poured over and far far too much being read into them by some.
I think this speaks to wanting control over the message. It's already been noted that fewer leaks are emerging than before and I'm guessing it's no coincidence.
That said, they'll be fully aware of the forensic analysis of every word they tweet and, if it's true they read fans forums like this one (God help them!), they'll be aware of the consternation they cause, which, as a defender of theirs, even I find aggravating.
More professional to say nothing if not asked directly for comment.
It is unprofessional and opened them up to more criticism unfortunately. Can also see this coming back to bite them when every rumour is not denied like this.
Again, it's lose/lose whatever they do for some.
They shouldn't comment but if in future they don't comment that will also be wrong.
They are making non-committal non-denials. They mean very little as the tweets contain very little hard information but they are being poured over and far far too much being read into them by some.
Another post that's spot on.Just leave them alone. Whatever they do is wrong.Yes mistakes have been made but Thomas has the best intentions for the club.
Well, us fans and our football club can’t live in good intentions, Thomas.
On my way back from The Killers, great night, have a quick look on here and it 's the same half a dozen posting incessantly. Do they really think we want to read their non stop posts all day & all evening? The answer is yes they do. (Maybe I'm also guilty of posting too much, but surely not non stop)?
Also went to the Killers tonight thought they were brilliant, now on the train home and obviously reading the same old bollocks as you.
Her post doesn't mean Garner isn't signing. Cawley says he's agreed a 2 year deal. She says that's not correct. Doesn't mean he isn't signing, it could mean that he's agreed a 3 year deal!
Whatever the reason is, it now just winds everybody up and no one knows what is going on.
Would have been for the best if Mrs Sandgaard had not said a thing and we would have found out early this week what’s being announced.
Can’t understand why she would do that.
But if she knows the information to be false, then why can't she say anything? She's certainly closer to the deal makers than Cawley is.
Then do it through the official club channels.
For me it’s mainly the ambiguity of the statement. A tweet saying ‘Understand this not to be correct’ sounds like something you would hear RonnieMoore write on here.
It was in response to Cawley saying: "Understand that to be correct"
Could be any one detail that is incorrect, term, salary, structure etc
I have a feeling neither TS or Mrs TS appreciate Cawley reaching out to leaks in the club rather than contacting direct.
It’s amateurish. If they have an issue with anything Rich puts out they can very easily contact him privately or they can publish a statement via the club setting the record straight if necessary.
This smacks of “we’ll decide what is said and when” and that’s a battle they will never win.
More important, if you’re “still interviewing” five weeks after your own decision to remove the manager I’d suggest you have a bigger problem.
It is amateurish but so are some journalists, Nixon springs to mind. If Cawley is wrong, and I say if, then I don't care how he is told. Why should a journalist who gets something wrong have to be told in private? He put it out there and if it factual incorrect then why should he escape criticism?
Comments
"Understand that to be correct"
Could be any one detail that is incorrect, term, salary, structure etc
I have a feeling neither TS or Mrs TS appreciate Cawley reaching out to leaks in the club rather than contacting direct.
This smacks of “we’ll decide what is said and when” and that’s a battle they will never win.
More important, if you’re “still interviewing” five weeks after your own decision to remove the manager I’d suggest you have a bigger problem.
The ‘we’ll decide what’s said and when’ is permeating society in general and it’s dangerous.
It’s their job to uncover the truth. From new Charlton managers to dodgy politicians.
Bravo @KiwiValley
It's Garner.
They want Garner.
Garner wants to come.
It's nearly all done.
But it's not quite all done.
There are bits of the deal still to be done.
So it's not all done.
TS and RM haven't said it's NOT Garner.
They haven't dismissed, denied or distanced the club from Garner.
When and if it has ALL been finalised ie ALL the coaches contracts signed and ALL the compensation to Swindon agreed then it will be done.
And when and if that happens it will be on the official site.
It's Sunday, enjoy yourselves, we only have one go at life then we die and are no more so as the song reminds us...
Live, love, laugh and for fecks sake be happy.
They shouldn't comment but if in future they don't comment that will also be wrong.
They are making non-committal non-denials. They mean very little as the tweets contain very little hard information but they are being poured over and far far too much being read into them by some.
Get the feeling some interviewees are having second thoughts. If Mrs TS is right about Ben Garner, then are we going to end up with a fifth or. sixth choice as manager.
That said, they'll be fully aware of the forensic analysis of every word they tweet and, if it's true they read fans forums like this one (God help them!), they'll be aware of the consternation they cause, which, as a defender of theirs, even I find aggravating.
More professional to say nothing if not asked directly for comment.