Conor Washington gone
Comments
-
Same, I liked him despite him not being clinical.6
-
A mistake as far as I'm concerned.71
-
Now on the OS, moronic move to not offer him a deal.18
-
John Marquis joining?1
-
Is that a joke?0
-
Jake Forster-Caskey will continue with Charlton next season after the club triggered a one-year extension in his contract.
Forster-Caskey, who joined the Addicks in January 2017, was the club’s Player of the Year for the 2020/2021 season and explained how pleased he was to see his stay at The Valley extended.
He said: "I'm delighted to be staying. It's an exciting time for the club and I can't wait to get going. I believe it is going to be a great season."
Director of Recruiting, Steve Gallen, said: “I’m pleased we’re keeping Jake with us. All the Charlton fans know what a good player he is and he’s a great character to have around the club too. He’s been working hard to get back to full fitness, we’ve seen glimpses this season and now he has a full summer to get his head down and get back to the level we all know he can play.”
Ryan Inniss, Josh Davison and Nathan Harness have also had one-year extensions triggered.
Meanwhile, George Dobson, Corey Blackett-Taylor and Ashley Maynard-Brewer are set to enter the final year of their contracts and the club have an option to extend each of those contracts by a year at the end of the 2022/23 season.
Gallen added: “We have a group of players in place and our focus this summer is adding further quality to the squad.”
Jason Pearce has been offered a contract coaching in the club’s academy, while the club are in ongoing negotiations with the representatives of Ben Purrington about a potential new playing contract.
The club can confirm the following players will leave the club following the expiration of their current contracts:
• Chris Gunter
• Conor Washington
• Adam Matthews
• Ben Watson
• Pape Souare
• Stephen Henderson
The club can confirm the following players will leave the club following the expiration of their loan deals:
• Akin Famewo
• Nile John
• Elliot Lee
• Jon Leko
• Juan Castillo
• Mason Burstow
The club would like to wish every player who is leaving the best of luck for the future and thank them for their efforts during their time with Charlton.
2 -
The forward we have best capable of the high press. Sorry should say had.10
-
Good decision in my book14
-
Hope notHastingsRed said:John Marquis joining?1 - Sponsored links:
-
Shame.
Worked tirelessly and created plenty of chances for himself and others.
No, not clinical but that's why he was playing for a league one side.
He still hit double figures despite injuries and being played out of position.
Good luck Connor and all the others leaving.
Question is: who made this decision?62 -
I'd have probably kept him, but it's not that crazy a decision.
Depends who we bring in, as always.5 -
Doubt we’ll get better value for money11
-
In my opinion it's one of 3 scenarios with Connor,
1. He didn't want to stay amid the sacking of Jacko and uncertainty over who would be coming in.
2. He wanted more money than we were prepared to pay him.
3. TS was pissed after he allegedly started rumours of replacing Jacko and decided he didn't want him in the squad6 -
Not Wash's biggest fan but I am surprised at that one. I can only think this move is because:
a) We're not gonna play with two strikers next seasonb) Management are upset he started that rumour in the dressing roomBecause on the face of things, if TS wants to play a high press, why get rid of CW?They're under big pressure to bring in better now.5 -
I'm a bit out of the loop, what rumours did he apparently start?0
-
Nope, not a fan of this at all.6
-
Real shame, he causes defenses problems with his runs and pressing.
One thing to note - do we know he was not offered a new deal? Or could it be he was offered a deal that was not satisfactory for him?
I imagine he would have interest from other clubs in League One, so may have a better deal lined up. (Just a thought)
1 -
Agree with all of them apart from Washington, I don't get that at all.
He's perfectly good enough to be third choice if we're playing 2 up front again next season and the 1 player in the squad most suited to pressing.
Even playing 1 upfront he gives us another option and can play out wide if needs be.7 -
Mistake - unless we’ve got something cracking lines up, we’ll do well to get better than Connor at this level8
- Sponsored links:
-
Who says we didn't? I think the consensus on here is there he'd be an excellent squad player, but he can't be an automatic first choice as he doesn't score enough. Maybe the club offered him a contract valued at a league one squad player and he was either unhappy with the figures (wages and/or length of contract) or unhappy with just being a squad player.shine166 said:Now on the OS, moronic move to not offer him a deal.
We have no idea of the discussions that go on behind closed doors (and we shouldn't know them), so why do people just assume the facts?
I like Conor, he works incredibly hard, but he's not clinical enough if we are aiming for promotion. This squad has just finished mid-table in league one, there are very few who we should be sad to see go.7 -
If we go into the season with Stockley | Aneke | Marquis | Davison as our Strikers we're definitely going back to 4-3-3HastingsRed said:John Marquis joining?1 -
Screams of a change of formation and no longer playing 2 up top4
-
I’d like us to have kept him as a squad player but I’m expecting to see us move back to a 4-3-3 / 4-2-3-1 which he doesn’t fit into. Those formations are more suited to a high press and our three wingers.
He’s not someone who’s going to stick around to wait and see if that fails, he can somewhere else and get plenty of game time.
Good luck to him.1 -
Lovely guy, tireless work ethic, about as lethal as a piece of dried cod. Sign of intent imo6
-
who has made that decision though? if its the owner, then we are fucked.Elthamaddick said:Screams of a change of formation and no longer playing 2 up top2 -
Certainly appreciate what Conor did for us.
Its also worth remembering that both he and Alex Gilbey to a risk by joining us at the worst period in the clubs history - They pretty much jumped into a mess, and could easily have ended up fucked had ESI kept us from Sandgaard.5 -
I can only presume we think we can get better than Washington.
We'd better start lumping on a top 6 finish.3 -
I'll guess at Sandgaard and his Advisory Committee.Henry Irving said:Shame if true. Hope it's not
Worked tirelessly and created plenty of chances for himself and others.
No, not clinical but that's why he was playing for a league one side.
He still hit double figures despite injuries and being played out of position.
Question is: who made this decision?
8 -
Innis staying I cannot understand. He'll get injured again and play 15 games.15
