Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton Athletic vs Pre-Season Friendlies | Preview & Match Threads (Welling p59, Swansea p67 )

17810121383

Comments

  • AddicksAddict
    AddicksAddict Posts: 15,796
    seth plum said:
    No names on our shirts.
    To the tune of Three Lions?
  • mendonca
    mendonca Posts: 9,405
    A ball playing goalie needs to do a bit better than that with their first touch!
  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 15,818
    seth plum said:
    No names on our shirts.
    To the tune of Three Lions?
    they couldn't even get a set of socks out there, so no chance of any shirt printing being done ;)
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,435
    seth plum said:
    No names on our shirts.
    To the tune of Three Lions?
    they couldn't even get a set of socks out there, so no chance of any shirt printing being done ;)
    Not a fan of those lyrics...
  • Starinnaddick
    Starinnaddick Posts: 4,345
    edited July 2022
    paulg1947 said:
    I didnt see any of the match, but reflecting on the obvious ,that we have a dearth of forwards, it 'beggars belief' that we sold Connor Washington .O K he was no poacher, or target man , but a forward never the less.  No wonder Euell left ,The lunatics continue to run the asylum, at Charlton
    Please keep up. We did not sell Conor Washington. He received a better offer from a Championship team. 
  • JohnnyH2
    JohnnyH2 Posts: 5,344
    paulg1947 said:
    I didnt see any of the match, but reflecting on the obvious ,that we have a dearth of forwards, it 'beggars belief' that we sold Connor Washington .O K he was no poacher, or target man , but a forward never the less.  No wonder Euell left ,The lunatics continue to run the asylum, at Charlton
    Please keep up. We did not sell Conor Washington. He recieved a better offer from a Championship team. 
    Having received no offer from us
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,355
    ... Charlton Nil.

    In the immortal words of Jim Davison.
  • There is a really irritating loud bird on the stream now!!
    Magpie?
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    The interviewer said something like you lost the game but at this stage it doesn't matter and Ben Garner agreed.
    I think he should have said it mattered, maybe not a huge amount, but any defeat matters.
    If we had won it would be 'it's nice to get a win', not 'it doesn't matter that we won'.
    If it is nice to get a win, then losing is a pain and it matters.
    I would have like Garner to say something like 'that's all very well, but being sanguine about a defeat can only be tolerated the one time, it was a poor goal to concede and it'd better not happen again'.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 15,818
    ...but it really doesn't matter though 
  • CafcWest
    CafcWest Posts: 6,171
    Didn’t watch and won’t bother until the home game which I’ll go to.  Really doesn’t mean too much just a chance for Garner to see players in an (almost) competitive game.  I remember previous crap pre-seasons where we’ve gone on to do really well and pre-seasons where we’ve won or drawn most and had terrible seasons.  Hopefully we’ve got 4 or 5 to join yet and just one player could change everything!
  • Charltonstu
    Charltonstu Posts: 225
    Still think we need a goal poacher 
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,987
    ...but it really doesn't matter though 
    Exactly. Next it’ll matter when one team loses a 5-a-side drill in training 
  • Karim_myBagheri
    Karim_myBagheri Posts: 12,725
    ...but it really doesn't matter though 
    Well, it does if you then want to say its been a perfect week. 
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,175
    I'm just trying to work out how I can blame Martin Sangaard 
    Great news - you don't need a reason! Just make some unfunny comment about something something hard shot and move on!
  • BR7_addick
    BR7_addick Posts: 10,212
    Egbo, does something bad.
    ITS THE FIRST GAME OF PRESEASON Aaarrrraaffgghhhghhhsjdhjebdjsj fuck you

    Gilbey, does something bad.
    FUCKING SELL THE CNUT CAN'T PERFORM AGAINST KILMARNOCK RUINED OUR SEASON Aararrraggghhhghhhh fuck you. 
    Probably because Egbo has played 45 minutes for us whilst Gilbey has done 2 years (badly).

    Morgan - new coach, new style, clean slate, HIS SEASON HAS COME
    Stockley - Garner will re-invent  Stockley, ITS WHAT GOOD COACHES DO


    Gilbey - Too old, too crap, FINISH HIM
    I’m not sure that’s reflective of what’s actually been posted but okay.  
  • LoOkOuT
    LoOkOuT Posts: 10,859
    I think we can all agree, we need to add about 10% more intensity to training.
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,231
    Still think we need a goal poacher 

    As we haven't replaced Conor Washington yet that is a Shay Given. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    So the general feeling is we haven't replaced Washington with a like for like.  Last year the problem was we played Washington wide in a front 3.

    Where is this Washington replacement going to play? 
  • thenewbie
    thenewbie Posts: 11,001
    Cafc43v3r said:
    So the general feeling is we haven't replaced Washington with a like for like.  Last year the problem was we played Washington wide in a front 3.

    Where is this Washington replacement going to play? 
    Possibly it's fairer to say we haven't actually replaced Washington at all. Not necessarily a like for like needed but we have three established strikers and one is Chuks so an extra body up front certainly won't hurt.
  • Starinnaddick
    Starinnaddick Posts: 4,345
    JohnnyH2 said:
    paulg1947 said:
    I didnt see any of the match, but reflecting on the obvious ,that we have a dearth of forwards, it 'beggars belief' that we sold Connor Washington .O K he was no poacher, or target man , but a forward never the less.  No wonder Euell left ,The lunatics continue to run the asylum, at Charlton
    Please keep up. We did not sell Conor Washington. He recieved a better offer from a Championship team. 
    Having received no offer from us
    He told someone at Bexleyheath Golf Club that Charlton were not prepared to renew his contract on the same terms. 

  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,783
    edited July 2022
    Goal was a poor one to concede but it’s only pre season and it’s the minutes in legs that matter.

    In terms of improving and making sure it doesn’t happen again…

    - Lavelle shouldn’t be passing it to a full back who has already been closed down. You’re asking for a turn over when you do that. Better to turn and give it back to the keeper.
    - Egbo needs to be careful with how much weight he’s putting on a pass back to the keeper (least to blame IMO, better to be slightly over hit than under hit)
    - Wollacott needs to be better positioned to receive the pass back from Egbo. Pointing out his first touch is obvious but being more centrally positioned instead of getting sucked towards the ball would’ve given him more time to take the ball down and redistribute it the other way.

  • cabbles
    cabbles Posts: 15,256
    CafcWest said:
    Didn’t watch and won’t bother until the home game which I’ll go to.  Really doesn’t mean too much just a chance for Garner to see players in an (almost) competitive game.  I remember previous crap pre-seasons where we’ve gone on to do really well and pre-seasons where we’ve won or drawn most and had terrible seasons.  Hopefully we’ve got 4 or 5 to join yet and just one player could change everything!
    Not to dissimilar to how I feel about friendlies.  Good for fitness and for a manager to introduce their style of play to the team, offer very little insight into anything else.  

    I don’t know if it’s just me, but I quite enjoy the break from it all until the opening day.  I’ve been to friendlies over the years, but as I’ve got older I’m less and less interested.  The Sutton game interests me as I can technically tick off a new ground as apparently friendlies count as part of doing the 92.  Other than that it’s good to have a break.  Especially after such a poor season.  

    Nothing wrong with enjoying the opposite approach to this 
  • Red_Chester
    Red_Chester Posts: 745
    Anyone know if we can recall AMB? 
  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 5,827
    Dazzler21 said:
    aliwibble said:
    Leuth said:
    supaclive said:
    Gilbey should be the one surplus to requirements
    Today was textbook. Aside from sloppiness in possession and utter ineffectiveness in attack, this was a case study in how he hides from being available for the ball in positions where he can play forward passes, and then makes himself available when the option is a five-yard wall-pass, achieving nothing. Watching him play is fucking torture 
    You have this weird obsession with the Albie vs Gilbey debate.  Neither are going to be starting for us this year and neither were the problem today.  The problem today was how uncomfortable our defense in the second half looked, the lack of depth at the wide positions such that we had to play Henry, Leaburn and Egbo out of position and the lack of finishers up front
    I don't think that's accurate. As far as I can tell Leuth isn't flying the flag for Morgan, he just can't stand Gilbey.
    BTW for those of us who weren't watching, do we have a consensus on what position the players were playing in the first and second half?
    Yes:

    First half:
    RB: Clare
    CB: Deji
    CB: Bones
    LB: Claydon

    MC: Morgan
    MC: JFC

    RW: CBT
    10: Aneke
    LW: DJ

    CF: Davisson

    Second Half:
    RB: Henry
    CB: Lavelle
    CB: Inniss
    LB: Egbo

    MC: Dobson
    AMC: Gilbey
    AMC: Fraser

    RW: Leaburn
    LW: Kirk

    CF: Stockley
    Ben Davisson hasn't been with us for years. Josh Davison though... 
    I know Ben- great guy. 

    Chucks behind Stockley inspires thoughts of high pressing football .  
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,871
    Off_it said:
    Just had a quick read through the comments - didn't even realise the season had started. (Oh, it hasn't you say?)

    It looks like some posters are clearly ahead of others in terms of their match thread sharpness. Several promising comments and interactions, but clearly some other posters are still mentally on the beach - or perhaps even physically on the beach?

    Nice to see some early pre-season use of big booming terms like "inexcusable" , "ineffective"  and "embarrassing" and also some nice approach play for lining up this seasons scapegoat(s).  Also a smattering of mild hand-wringing, stating-the-bleedin-obvious and "I told you so"-style comments all bodes well for the coming season. 

    Overall a pretty useful workout all round and some much needed minutes on keyboards under the belt, especially for those who really struggled to get going. I'm sure with the addition of some new posters and the return of a few more old stalwarts, the "quality" of the match threads will steadily improve as the season draws nearer. However, the big question remains over whether this will ultimately be enough for us to achieve a title-winning match thread standard. We live in hope.

    Verdict: 4.5/10. 
    Apologies, I was in Reykjavik's penis museum during the game, so unable to bring some sense and wisdom to the commentary.
  • Off_it said:
    Just had a quick read through the comments - didn't even realise the season had started. (Oh, it hasn't you say?)

    It looks like some posters are clearly ahead of others in terms of their match thread sharpness. Several promising comments and interactions, but clearly some other posters are still mentally on the beach - or perhaps even physically on the beach?

    Nice to see some early pre-season use of big booming terms like "inexcusable" , "ineffective"  and "embarrassing" and also some nice approach play for lining up this seasons scapegoat(s).  Also a smattering of mild hand-wringing, stating-the-bleedin-obvious and "I told you so"-style comments all bodes well for the coming season. 

    Overall a pretty useful workout all round and some much needed minutes on keyboards under the belt, especially for those who really struggled to get going. I'm sure with the addition of some new posters and the return of a few more old stalwarts, the "quality" of the match threads will steadily improve as the season draws nearer. However, the big question remains over whether this will ultimately be enough for us to achieve a title-winning match thread standard. We live in hope.

    Verdict: 4.5/10. 
    Apologies, I was in Reykjavik's penis museum during the game, so unable to bring some sense and wisdom to the commentary.
    I was gonna visit that museum but I heard it's full of pricks.  :D
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,231
    Cafc43v3r said:
    So the general feeling is we haven't replaced Washington with a like for like.  Last year the problem was we played Washington wide in a front 3.

    Where is this Washington replacement going to play? 

    A forward who can play in a two or a Three up front. This player has to have the ability to assist and score goals and has some pace ! How much money do we have !

    Corey Blackett-Taylor really needs to get the ball in an advanced position so only has one defender to skin. He could play in a 3 but mainly for his assists but he should chip in with a few.

    I like the idea of the two footed Corey playing on the side of least resistance. Left or right as long as the new forward can do the same as well as support for the Central striker Chuks/Jayden.

    As football is a 16 man game now there will be plenty of opportunity for this forward to shine. Would be great if he can support either Stockley/Aneke as neither should be isolated in a 3 this time around.


This discussion has been closed.